[Bug tree-optimization/105834] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O2 (trunk vs. 12.1.0)

2024-05-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105834 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.3|13.4 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/105834] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O2 (trunk vs. 12.1.0)

2023-11-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105834 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/105834] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O2 (trunk vs. 12.1.0)

2023-04-08 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105834 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/105834] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O2 (trunk vs. 12.1.0)

2023-02-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105834 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- c_5 : int [0, 0][3, 3] vs c_5 : [irange] int [0, 3] NONZERO 0x3 Obvious the first range is more correct, c_5 can only be either 0 or 3.

[Bug tree-optimization/105834] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O2 (trunk vs. 12.1.0)

2023-02-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105834 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/105834] [13 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O2 (trunk vs. 12.1.0)

2022-06-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105834 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Dead Code Elimination |[13 Regression] Dead Code