https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110177
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110177
--- Comment #3 from Theodoros Theodoridis ---
I think the correct bisection is: r11-3063-gfcae5121154 (or its parent
r11-3062-g90e88fd376b)
I can't build its parent but with its grandparent r11-3061-g1644d7f4c1c the
call to foo is eliminated:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110177
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-06-08
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110177
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Hmm, in ccp1, GCC 11.3 does:
Visiting statement:
# RANGE [0, 0] NONZERO 0
b_33 = (short intD.25) _11;
which is likely CONSTANT
Applying pattern match.pd:3405, gimple-match.c:27041
Applying pattern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110177
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
Keywords|