https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113808
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70b9dd8b388668df96f457b3c6ee33fc5b35f94c
commit r14-8882-g70b9dd8b388668df96f457b3c6ee33fc5b35f94c
Author: Tamar Christina
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113808
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113808
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3f69db1812106cb5bab203e17a60300ac51cdc68
commit r14-8880-g3f69db1812106cb5bab203e17a60300ac51cdc68
Author: Tamar Christina
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113808
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113808
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
It's surely a bug in the vectorizer early exit handling. I just don't know
what exactly is wrong right now ;)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113808
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113808
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> > Started with r14-8768-g85094e2aa6dba7908f053046f02dd443e8f65d72
> > The regression status is unclear because we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113808
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
With the following I don't see things going wrong, but we end up with the loop
having the STOP exit last instead and thus a PEELED case.
function bar (n) result (k)
integer :: n, k
!$omp simd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113808
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Started with r14-8768-g85094e2aa6dba7908f053046f02dd443e8f65d72
> The regression status is unclear because we emitted sorry on this
> before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113808
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Reduced a bit, w/o collapse:
program main
integer :: n, i,k
n = 11
do i = 1, n,2
!$omp simd lastprivate(k)
do k = 1, i + 41
if (k > 11 + 41 .or. k < 1) error stop
end do
end do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113808
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113808
--- Comment #2 from Tamar Christina ---
I guess whether that code is correct depends on which exit was picked though.
I'll look at dump too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113808
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Keywords|
13 matches
Mail list logo
