https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
--- Comment #24 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6a3d1f5bcfd954b614155d96c97bde8ac230e2e
commit r13-8488-ge6a3d1f5bcfd954b614155d96c97bde8ac230e2e
Author: liuhongt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
--- Comment #23 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9a6c7aa1b011b77fcd9b19f7b8d7ff0fc823cdb2
commit r14-9603-g9a6c7aa1b011b77fcd9b19f7b8d7ff0fc823cdb2
Author: liuhongt
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
--- Comment #22 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:199b021a38f30b681e0dbecd2d0296beabd50b13
commit r13-8475-g199b021a38f30b681e0dbecd2d0296beabd50b13
Author: liuhongt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
--- Comment #21 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to JuzheZhong from comment #19)
> I think it's better to add pr114396.c into vect testsuite instead of x86
> target test since it's the bug not only happens on x86.
Actually I think a testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
--- Comment #20 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to JuzheZhong from comment #19)
> I think it's better to add pr114396.c into vect testsuite instead of x86
> target test since it's the bug not only happens on x86.
Sure, there's no target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
--- Comment #19 from JuzheZhong ---
I think it's better to add pr114396.c into vect testsuite instead of x86 target
test since it's the bug not only happens on x86.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac2f8c2a367151fc0410f904339c475a953cffc8
commit r14-9591-gac2f8c2a367151fc0410f904339c475a953cffc8
Author: liuhongt
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
--- Comment #17 from Hongtao Liu ---
> >
> > The to_mpz args look like they could be mixing signs as well:
> >
I tries below, looks like mixing signs works well.
debug show step_expr is -5 and signed.
short a = 0xF;
short b[16];
unsigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #16 from Hongtao
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
--- Comment #15 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> (In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #8)
> > No fallout on x86 or aarch64.
> >
> > Of course using false instead of TYPE_SIGN (utype) is also possible and
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114396
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.2.1
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
13 matches
Mail list logo
