[Bug tree-optimization/114476] [13/14 Regression] wrong code with -fwrapv -O3 -fno-vect-cost-model (and -march=armv9-a+sve2 on aarch64 and -march=rv64gcv on riscv)

[rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114476

--- Comment #8 from Robin Dapp  ---
I tried some things (for the related bug without -fwrapv) then got busy with
some other things.  I'm going to have another look later this week.

[Bug tree-optimization/114476] [13/14 Regression] wrong code with -fwrapv -O3 -fno-vect-cost-model (and -march=armv9-a+sve2 on aarch64 and -march=rv64gcv on riscv)

[juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114476

--- Comment #7 from JuzheZhong  ---
Hi, Robin.

Will you fix this bug ?

[Bug tree-optimization/114476] [13/14 Regression] wrong code with -fwrapv -O3 -fno-vect-cost-model (and -march=armv9-a+sve2 on aarch64 and -march=rv64gcv on riscv)

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114476

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski  ---
I am going to mark this as a dup of bug 114485 since the issue is exactly the
same.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 114485 ***