[Bug tree-optimization/114485] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 -march=rv64gcv on riscv or `-O3 -march=armv9-a` for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114485 --- Comment #12 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:85621f98d245004a6c9787dde21e0acc17ab2c50 commit r14-9786-g85621f98d245004a6c9787dde21e0acc17ab2c50 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/114485] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 -march=rv64gcv on riscv or `-O3 -march=armv9-a` for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114485 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 57871 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57871=edit patch I'm testing this (on x86_64-linux).

[Bug tree-optimization/114485] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 -march=rv64gcv on riscv or `-O3 -march=armv9-a` for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114485 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- /* Init_expr will be update by vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer, if niters or vf is unkown: For shift, when shift mount >= precision, there would be UD. For mult, don't known how to

[Bug tree-optimization/114485] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 -march=rv64gcv on riscv or `-O3 -march=armv9-a` for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114485 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/114485] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 -march=rv64gcv on riscv or `-O3 -march=armv9-a` for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114485 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/114485] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 -march=rv64gcv on riscv or `-O3 -march=armv9-a` for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114485 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug tree-optimization/114485] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 -march=rv64gcv on riscv or `-O3 -march=armv9-a` for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114485 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Note the missed SCCP is filed as PR 114502 (and another bug for the non-constant loop bounds case; I don't have the # right now).

[Bug tree-optimization/114485] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 -march=rv64gcv on riscv or `-O3 -march=armv9-a` for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114485 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 114476 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/114485] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 -march=rv64gcv on riscv or `-O3 -march=armv9-a` for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114485 --- Comment #4 from Robin Dapp --- Yes, the vectorization looks ok. The extracted live values are not used afterwards and therefore the whole vectorized loop is being thrown away. Then we do one iteration of the epilogue loop, inverting the

[Bug tree-optimization/114485] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 -march=rv64gcv on riscv or `-O3 -march=armv9-a` for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114485 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/114485] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 -march=rv64gcv on riscv or `-O3 -march=armv9-a` for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114485 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Huh. _75 = [vec_duplicate_expr] pretmp_34; _76 = -_75; _77 = VEC_PERM_EXPR <_75, _76, { 0, POLY_INT_CST [4, 4], 1, POLY_INT_CST [5, 4], 2, POLY_INT_CST [6, 4], ... }>; # c_lsm.7_8 = PHI <_2(9),

[Bug tree-optimization/114485] [13/14 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 -march=rv64gcv on riscv or `-O3 -march=armv9-a` for aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114485 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||12.3.0 Target Milestone|---