--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-07
23:21 ---
I can confirm this has been fixed now.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From cjb at mrao dot cam dot ac dot uk 2005-03-05
15:53 ---
No you are no missing reading. This is vectorized on x86 but not on PPC.
Thanks, Andrew. I'm also having trouble reproducing it on PPC (under OS X
10.3.4), though. Same GCC source tree and test
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-05
17:03 ---
Hmm, I am using a slightly older compiler, so maybe this is fixed already.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18546
--- Additional Comments From cjb at mrao dot cam dot ac dot uk 2005-03-04
15:11 ---
I'm not sure that I'm reproducing this; I'm getting the loop reported as
vectorized:
% ./g++ -O2 -msse2 -march=pentium4 -ftree-vectorize -fdump-tree-vect-stats
-ftree-vectorizer-verbose=9 -S 18546.cpp
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-04
15:18 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
I'm not sure that I'm reproducing this; I'm getting the loop reported as
vectorized:
No you are no missing reading. This is vectorized on x86 but not on PPC.
--
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-20
18:41 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
