https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19104
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19104
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-08
20:47:39 UTC ---
Related to PR 19105 and PR 46309
--
Bug 19104 depends on bug 21445, which changed state.
Bug 21445 Summary: [meta-bug] we need a reassociate pass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21445
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-21
11:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=7791)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7791action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19104
--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-21
11:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=7792)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7792action=view)
assembly at -O2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19104
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-21
15:54 ---
Again (this is really the same problem as 19105):
Fold unlike simplify_rtx does not do as re-association (or really as much as
re-association).
Oh, forgot to say why, because we call fold a lot more than
