https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21465
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21465
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||53947
Severity|minor
--- Comment #4 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2008-07-22 15:48 ---
i had a patch to expand pow at the tree level, but it conflicted with fold
(which consistently tried to rebuild pow function calls). the outcome might be
better now that we have PAREN_EXPR, though.
--
bonzini at gnu
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-28 10:51 ---
*** Bug 28524 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-28 11:45 ---
the vectorizer should recognize this particular case or we might want to
expand pow() again at the tree level before the vectorizer.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21465
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-09
12:21 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
