[Bug tree-optimization/31873] missed optimization: we don't move "invariant casts" out of loops

2019-03-03 Thread egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31873 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dberlin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/31873] missed optimization: we don't move invariant casts out of loops

2007-05-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-09 10:47 --- Does it do it if you specify --param lim-expensive=1? Then it's just a cost issue. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/31873] missed optimization: we don't move invariant casts out of loops

2007-05-09 Thread rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-09 11:10 --- (In reply to comment #1) Does it do it if you specify --param lim-expensive=1? Then it's just a cost issue. no, lim won't do this transformation. Store motion could probably be persuaded to do it by a few