--- Comment #10 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-30 08:00
---
Yes, it is harmless, so P4 should be better match. The test is checking that
loop disambugiation is done one way not the other way while both are correct
choices.
Honza
--
hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-04 12:35 ---
Honza, any news on this? If it is really harmless, maybe we should just make
it P4, not P2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35629
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35629
--- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-16 02:44 ---
Subject: Bug 35629
Author: hp
Date: Wed Apr 16 02:44:01 2008
New Revision: 134339
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=134339
Log:
PR tree-optimization/35629
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-25.c:
--- Comment #7 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-10 00:03 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I am discussing with Zdenek the proper fix.
Any conclusion in sight? If not, I'll xfail this as per protocol.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35629
--- Comment #3 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2008-03-19 06:58 ---
*** Bug 35636 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-03-19 13:23 ---
I think revision 133313
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-03/msg00531.html
is the cause.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35629
--- Comment #5 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-19 22:58 ---
Also seen on hppa.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2008-03-19 23:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-25.c scan-tree-dump-times
profile fails
This seems to affect about every target, but it is essentially harmless.
I am discussing with Zdenek the proper fix.
Honza
--
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Summary|gcc.dg/tree-ssa/loop-25.c
--- Comment #2 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-19 03:07 ---
My autotester says loop-25 fails in the same way for cris-elf, due to a patch
committed in the range 133311:133318.
--
hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
11 matches
Mail list logo