https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39251
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39251
--- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-09-23 22:40:10 UTC ---
Test hasn't been removed. I also don't see the fail anymore.
--
John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39251
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pi
--- Comment #10 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2010-01-15 15:05 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/new1.C scan-tree-dump-not
forwprop1 "= .* \+ -"
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> So yes it does look ARM specific . Also peeking at results on gcc-testresults
> doesn't sho
--- Comment #9 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-15 09:05 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Hi Mark,
Many thanks for looking into this.
> However, if this is behaving different on ARM from (say) x86, I think that
> the ABI is a likely
> cause because, as you say, the C++ ABI
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-15 03:26
---
Ramana --
If I'm reading the log correctly for PR36633 the change that Jason made there
didn't actually fix the bug; it was just a cleanup. He commented that
something else had changed which made the bug go away.
--- Comment #7 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-15 01:15 ---
With trunk I still see the dump as per the original attachment .
I think these 3 lines in the dump cause it to fail . The question though is why
the +4 and -4 are not folded out on the ARM port
D.1844_3 = (unsig
--- Comment #6 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-15 01:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=19603)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19603&action=view)
Dumps from testcase.
dumps attached.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39251
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-05-13
15:20 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/new1.C scan-tree-dump-not forwprop1 "= .*
\+ -"
> trunk or 4.4?
I see it in trunk revision 147374.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39251
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-13 13:35 ---
trunk or 4.4?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39251
--- Comment #3 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-13 10:10 ---
Appears on trunk as of r147467.
--
ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009-02-19
18:28 ---
Subject: Re: New: FAIL:
g++.dg/tree-ssa/new1.C scan-tree-dump-not forwprop1 "= .* \+ -"
Attached new1.C.028t.forwprop1.
Dave
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2009
12 matches
Mail list logo
