--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-08 12:41
---
It looks like this bug is fixed. Please re-open if struct-layout-1 tests still
fail.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #16 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-07 12:39 ---
I see that in your reports only
gcc.target/powerpc/405-dlmzb-strlen-1.c scan-assembler dlmzb. (-m32)
gcc.target/powerpc/440-dlmzb-strlen-1.c scan-assembler dlmzb. (-m32)
are left (and I myself also can't
--- Comment #15 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-05 17:26 ---
The struct-layout-1 failures were fixed by the patch from Michael Matz, which
Michael Meissner checked in as r147021. The new failures in gcc.target/powerpc
still exist and, as far as I know, haven't yet been investi
--- Comment #14 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-05 16:10
---
Janis, is this still an issue?
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from meissner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-30 22:00
---
Subject: Bug 39955
Author: meissner
Date: Thu Apr 30 21:59:49 2009
New Revision: 147021
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147021
Log:
fix for PR 39955
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
t
--- Comment #12 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-30 16:30 ---
In comment #10 I meant that the tests in gcc.c-torture/execute now pass for
powerpc64-linux with -m32 and -m64, and that the 3 tests in gcc.target/powerpc
listed in comment #7 still fail for powerpc64-linux with -m32;
--- Comment #11 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-30 00:43 ---
The compiler I configured on a powerpc64 host with the options you use
doesn't exhibit the execute.exp fails from comment #7 for me. Neither with
unix/-m32 nor with unix/-m64 .
When I configure a compiler for a power
--- Comment #10 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 22:03 ---
I forgot to mention in the previous comment that on powerpc64-linux (-m32/-m64)
with revision 146982 plus the patch from comment #5, the torture tests
mentioned in comment #7 now pass but the powerpc tests still fail
--- Comment #9 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 21:57 ---
The struct-layout-1 tests all pass on powerpc64-linux (-m32/-m64) with revision
146982 plus the patch from comment #5.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39955
--- Comment #8 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 17:57 ---
The patch from comment #1 had one peculiar bug, which could explain some
miscompilations. I just committed a corrected version as r146982 and
for me the struct-layout tests don't fail anymore. OTOH they weren't faili
--- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 17:39 ---
Decimal float is enabled by default for powerpc*-*-linux*.
With the patch in comment #5 the ICE disappears but every struct-layout-1 test
fails at execution time.
With the patch referenced in comment #5, there are ex
--- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-04-29 13:50 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Pff, I still can't reproduce the testsuite failures, but I can reproduce the
> ICE on the testcase from the initial comment. rs6000.c needs to handle
> SSA_NAMEs now. I'm currently regstr
--- Comment #5 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 11:07 ---
Pff, I still can't reproduce the testsuite failures, but I can reproduce the
ICE on the testcase from the initial comment. rs6000.c needs to handle
SSA_NAMEs now. I'm currently regstrapping this:
Index: config/rs6000
--- Comment #4 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 09:22 ---
I didn't enable it explicitely, but Janis neither (according to the
testresults post), so it's probably default. But I did not use some
other options, in particular the --with-cpu=default32, so I'm rechecking
with Jani
--- Comment #3 from bergner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 02:14 ---
Michael, did you configure with --enable-decimal-float? I can never remember
whether that is enabled by default for powerpc64-linux or not.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39955
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 00:49 ---
The patch from Andreas doesn't make a difference for the struct-layout-1 tests.
Here are test results from earlier today:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-04/msg03009.html
There are lots of regressions i
--- Comment #1 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-29 00:23 ---
I tested powerpc64-linux a few minutes ago (r146824) and it doesn't show
these errors. I have Andreas Krebbels patch applied, though, and it might
really make a difference. See
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-0
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
18 matches
Mail list logo
