--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-24 07:45 ---
Can't reproduce with either branches/gcc-4_4-branch or
branches/redhat/gcc-4_4-branch any more.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43416
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-18 17:55 ---
Works on the trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43416
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-18 17:56 ---
Could be a dup of bug 42871 or PR 43074.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43416
--- Comment #5 from wlam at kosmix dot com 2010-03-19 04:23 ---
I think you're right--I built gcc trunk at r157545, and I don't see the
segmentation fault there. (Thanks for your quick response!)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43416
--- Comment #1 from wlam at kosmix dot com 2010-03-18 03:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=20137)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20137action=view)
Minimized C++ source causing segmentation fault in gcc 4.4.3 at -O3
--
--- Comment #2 from wlam at kosmix dot com 2010-03-18 03:14 ---
Oops, the description is truncated:
(built from the GNU source distribution, though the Fedora version of 4.4.3
shows similar behavior--
$ g++ -Wfatal-errors -c -O3 -Wall foo.ccfoo.cc: In member function void