--- Comment #36 from ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-09 15:37
---
Fixed in 4.4, 4.5 and trunk.
--
ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44328
--- Comment #35 from ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 09:27
---
(In reply to comment #32)
I don't know if there are plans for more releases in the 4.4 series, but can
it
be applied to the 4.4 branch too?
The backport for 4.4 is ready. I am just waiting for approval on
--- Comment #34 from ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 13:10
---
(In reply to comment #33)
Yes, 4.4.5 and maybe 4.4.6 is planned.
(In reply to comment #31)
(In reply to comment #30)
(In reply to comment #28)
Hm, no, I was too quick pruning my inbox. The patch
--- Comment #27 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 11:10
---
As far as I understand it, this is fixed with
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-08/msg00577.html
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #28 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 11:23
---
Hm, no, I was too quick pruning my inbox. The patch apparently has
not been applied to the 4.5 branch.
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #29 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 11:24
---
I'll do that, hopefully sooner rather than later.
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #30 from ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 11:25
---
(In reply to comment #28)
Hm, no, I was too quick pruning my inbox. The patch apparently has
not been applied to the 4.5 branch.
It's on its way. I've been testing in conjunction with a couple of other
--- Comment #31 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 11:32
---
(In reply to comment #30)
(In reply to comment #28)
Hm, no, I was too quick pruning my inbox. The patch apparently has
not been applied to the 4.5 branch.
It's on its way. I've been testing in
--- Comment #32 from jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org 2010-09-01 11:47
---
I don't know if there are plans for more releases in the 4.4 series, but can it
be applied to the 4.4 branch too?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44328
--- Comment #33 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 11:50 ---
Yes, 4.4.5 and maybe 4.4.6 is planned.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44328
--- Comment #26 from ian dot bolton at arm dot com 2010-08-03 17:09 ---
(In reply to comment #25)
(In reply to comment #24)
(In reply to comment #23)
I can confirm this fails with GCC 4.4.4 and that GCC 4.3.2 works.
I get no warning and correct code in latest 4.4 branch
--- Comment #24 from ian dot bolton at arm dot com 2010-08-02 12:23 ---
(In reply to comment #23)
I can confirm this fails with GCC 4.4.4 and that GCC 4.3.2 works.
I get no warning and correct code in latest 4.4 branch (4.4.5 - 20100727), but
I do get the warning and incorrect code
--- Comment #25 from ian dot bolton at arm dot com 2010-08-02 13:33 ---
(In reply to comment #24)
(In reply to comment #23)
I can confirm this fails with GCC 4.4.4 and that GCC 4.3.2 works.
I get no warning and correct code in latest 4.4 branch (4.4.5 - 20100727), but
I do get
--- Comment #23 from jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org 2010-07-24 22:23
---
I can confirm this fails with GCC 4.4.4 and that GCC 4.3.2 works.
--
jifl-bugzilla at jifvik dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #22 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-05 13:43 ---
With trunk as of a couple of days back - the testcase when compiled with
-mcpu=cortex-a9 -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp for EABI generates the following
code for C++ but not for C.
Notice the removal of the check of
16 matches
Mail list logo
