http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54674
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54674
--- Comment #11 from William J. Schmidt
2012-09-26 16:49:45 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed Sep 26 16:49:32 2012
New Revision: 191765
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=191765
Log:
2012-09-26 Bill Schmidt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54674
--- Comment #10 from Oleg Endo 2012-09-24
21:26:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> To be clear, SLSR doesn't rely on mult costs being greater than int costs --
> it
> simply trusts that the given costs are accurate and makes decisions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54674
--- Comment #9 from William J. Schmidt 2012-09-24
20:32:34 UTC ---
To be clear, SLSR doesn't rely on mult costs being greater than int costs -- it
simply trusts that the given costs are accurate and makes decisions based upon
them.
Don'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54674
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo 2012-09-24 20:11:03
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I'm working on a patch to avoid introducing a multiply by a pointer type, such
> as happened here.
>
> The interesting thing is that this doesn't look
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54674
--- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt 2012-09-24
18:35:41 UTC ---
I'm working on a patch to avoid introducing a multiply by a pointer type, such
as happened here.
The interesting thing is that this doesn't look like a profitable
transf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54674
--- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt 2012-09-24
01:38:37 UTC ---
Andrew, thanks for chasing this down. I'll have a look.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54674
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54674
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo 2012-09-23 22:39:05
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > I've confirmed that this also happens for SH-anything.
> > Unfortunately I'm not familiar with the parts where things go wro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54674
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-09-23
22:35:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I've confirmed that this also happens for SH-anything.
> Unfortunately I'm not familiar with the parts where things go wrong. Andrew,
> any hints wh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54674
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sh4-unknown-linux-gnu |sh*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54674
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Compo
12 matches
Mail list logo
