http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
--- Comment #16 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-02-20
13:36:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Hey Martin,
I noticed that this doesn't apply cleanly to google/4_7 without some
massaging.
The difference between
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
Matt Hargett matt at use dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
--- Comment #12 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21
17:02:18 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Jan 21 17:02:08 2013
New Revision: 195339
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195339
Log:
2013-01-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
--- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-21
17:09:27 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Mon Jan 21 17:09:22 2013
New Revision: 195340
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195340
Log:
2013-01-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
--- Comment #11 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-17
11:43:18 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu Jan 17 11:43:14 2013
New Revision: 195262
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=195262
Log:
2013-01-17
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-10
18:02:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Let me look into those...
Try the patch I attached to PR45375
I have updated to revision 195082 which I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-09
10:36:02 UTC ---
Unfortunately, that causes the following failures:
g++.dg/lto/20081217-2 cp_lto_20081217-2_0.o-cp_lto_20081217-2_0.o link, -O2
-flto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2013-01-09 15:23:54 UTC
---
Let me look into those...
Try the patch I attached to PR45375
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-08
18:16:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 29111
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29111
Untested fix
I'm currently bootstrapping and testing this patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-01-03
16:29:49 UTC ---
Martin, I guess this is yours. I have no idea here ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55264
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
17 matches
Mail list logo