https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|Aarch64_64 |Aarch64_64,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
--- Comment #12 from collison at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: collison
Date: Tue Feb 10 02:23:40 2015
New Revision: 220562
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220562root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-09 Michael Collison michael.colli...@linaro.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
--- Comment #9 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: alalaw01
Date: Mon Oct 27 14:04:43 2014
New Revision: 216736
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216736root=gccview=rev
Log:
[Vectorizer] Make REDUC_xxx_EXPR tree codes produce a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
--- Comment #10 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: alalaw01
Date: Mon Oct 27 14:20:52 2014
New Revision: 216737
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216737root=gccview=rev
Log:
Add new optabs for reducing vectors to scalars
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
Alan Lawrence alan.lawrence at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
--- Comment #3 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks for the clarification. In that case, what element does bit positions
96..127 correspond to in { 120, 0, 0, 0 }?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 9 May 2014, belagod at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
--- Comment #3 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
--- Comment #5 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So, does that mean the folded value 120 is in the wrong place? The fix that I'm
testing swaps the first and last elements of the const vector {120, 0, 0, 0}.
PS: Sorry, my statement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tejas Belagod from comment #5)
So, does that mean the folded value 120 is in the wrong place? The fix that
I'm testing swaps the first and last elements of the const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
(In reply to Tejas Belagod from comment #5)
So, does that mean the folded value 120 is in the wrong place? The fix that
I'm testing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114
--- Comment #1 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry I meant it fixes this on aarch64_be.
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/no-scevccp-outer-7.c execution test
14 matches
Mail list logo
