https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61279
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61279
--- Comment #5 from Arseny Solokha ---
OK, it seems to be accidentally fixed somewhere between the two snapshots as
now I'm also unable to reproduce it w/ 4.10.0-alpha20140525.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61279
--- Comment #4 from Arseny Solokha ---
I even have another reproducer which is basically identical to the original one
but not completely.
int t;
int n[1] = { 0 };
void
x(void)
{
int v;
int r;
int i[4] = { 0 };
for (v = 0; v < 1; ++v) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61279
--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha ---
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (both host and target), powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe
(likewise).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61279
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #2 from Richard Bie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61279
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
