[Bug tree-optimization/61917] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4913

2015-02-25 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/61917] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4913

2015-02-25 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917 Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot

[Bug tree-optimization/61917] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4913

2015-02-25 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917 --- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktietz Date: Wed Feb 25 14:12:46 2015 New Revision: 220968 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220968root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-02-25 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/61917] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4913

2015-02-25 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- I certainly can reproduce it, the problem is that reduc_def_stmt is NULL. dt is vect_constant_def.

[Bug tree-optimization/61917] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4913

2015-02-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug tree-optimization/61917] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4913

2015-02-25 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917 --- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmm, just retested it for gcc's trunk. Can't reproduce it. I will retest with current trunk, I might have a different patch in tree, which makes the difference here. Additionally,

[Bug tree-optimization/61917] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4913

2015-02-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #12) Hmm, just retested it for gcc's trunk. Can't reproduce it. I will retest with current trunk, I might have a different patch in tree, which

[Bug tree-optimization/61917] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4913

2015-02-25 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917 --- Comment #14 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13) (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #12) Hmm, just retested it for gcc's trunk. Can't reproduce it. I will retest with current trunk, I

[Bug tree-optimization/61917] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4913

2015-02-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #14) (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13) (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #12) Hmm, just retested it for gcc's trunk. Can't reproduce it.

[Bug tree-optimization/61917] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4913

2015-02-25 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917 --- Comment #19 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktietz Date: Wed Feb 25 18:21:37 2015 New Revision: 220987 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220987root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/61917 *

[Bug tree-optimization/61917] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4913

2015-02-25 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917 --- Comment #17 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Just posted a fix. For the 4.9 branch I could finally reproduce this error. It is caused by the PHI-check for a vector-constant, which obviously has no valid statment ...

[Bug tree-optimization/61917] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4913

2015-02-25 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917 --- Comment #18 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktietz Date: Wed Feb 25 18:20:34 2015 New Revision: 220986 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220986root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-02-25 Kai Tietz kti...@redhat.com PR

[Bug tree-optimization/61917] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4913

2015-02-25 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917 --- Comment #20 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- HJ: Does recent patch fixes issue for you too?

[Bug tree-optimization/61917] [4.9 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vectorizable_reduction, at tree-vect-loop.c:4913

2015-02-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61917 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED