[Bug tree-optimization/64326] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:581

2015-02-10 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- So fixed?

[Bug tree-optimization/64326] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:581

2015-02-10 Thread tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326 --- Comment #8 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: tbsaunde Date: Tue Feb 10 14:49:07 2015 New Revision: 220585 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220585root=gccview=rev Log: cap frequency in make_forwarder_block In the testcase the

[Bug tree-optimization/64326] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:581

2015-02-10 Thread tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326 tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/64326] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:581

2015-02-09 Thread tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326 --- Comment #7 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6) Hmm, the ICE seems to not reproduce for me :( I can reproduce with r220551, nothing special x86_64-linux-gnu with ./cc1 -O3 test.c

[Bug tree-optimization/64326] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:581

2015-02-09 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmm, the ICE seems to not reproduce for me :(

[Bug tree-optimization/64326] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:581

2015-02-05 Thread tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326 --- Comment #5 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4) make_forwarder_block is definitely wrong on not capping. But I do not see how vectorizing can get us to a frequncy over FREQ_MAX? So probably some

[Bug tree-optimization/64326] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:581

2015-01-30 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326 --- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- make_forwarder_block is definitely wrong on not capping. But I do not see how vectorizing can get us to a frequncy over FREQ_MAX? So probably some earlier bug in there too

[Bug tree-optimization/64326] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:581

2015-01-22 Thread tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326 tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/64326] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:581

2014-12-16 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug tree-optimization/64326] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:581

2014-12-16 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/64326] [5 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:581

2014-12-16 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Started with r211725.