[Bug tree-optimization/64434] [5 Regression] Performance regression after operand canonicalization (r216728).

2015-02-09 Thread ysrumyan at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434 --- Comment #19 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Andrew! Could you please try modified test-case (test1.c) which is attached. Thanks.

[Bug tree-optimization/64434] [5 Regression] Performance regression after operand canonicalization (r216728).

2015-02-09 Thread ysrumyan at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434 --- Comment #20 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 34700 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34700action=edit another test-case

[Bug tree-optimization/64434] [5 Regression] Performance regression after operand canonicalization (r216728).

2015-02-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434 --- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- This testcase fails for AARCH64:ilp32 (that is AARCH64 with -mabi=ilp32).

[Bug tree-optimization/64434] [5 Regression] Performance regression after operand canonicalization (r216728).

2015-01-16 Thread ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434 --- Comment #17 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ienkovich Date: Fri Jan 16 14:22:57 2015 New Revision: 219741 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219741root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ PR tree-optimization/64434 *

[Bug tree-optimization/64434] [5 Regression] Performance regression after operand canonicalization (r216728).

2015-01-15 Thread ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434 --- Comment #14 from ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ienkovich Date: Thu Jan 15 11:39:20 2015 New Revision: 219646 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219646root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ PR tree-optimization/64434 * cfgexpand.c

[Bug tree-optimization/64434] [5 Regression] Performance regression after operand canonicalization (r216728).

2015-01-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed. Can you please move the testcase away from the torture (you specify -O1...)? Just to gcc.dg/

[Bug tree-optimization/64434] [5 Regression] Performance regression after operand canonicalization (r216728).

2015-01-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/64434] [5 Regression] Performance regression after operand canonicalization (r216728).

2015-01-14 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

[Bug tree-optimization/64434] [5 Regression] Performance regression after operand canonicalization (r216728).

2015-01-13 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/64434] [5 Regression] Performance regression after operand canonicalization (r216728).

2015-01-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/64434] [5 Regression] Performance regression after operand canonicalization (r216728).

2014-12-30 Thread ysrumyan at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434 --- Comment #11 from Yuri Rumyantsev ysrumyan at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 34363 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34363action=edit patch to fix issue This patch fixed almost all issues related to operand

[Bug tree-optimization/64434] [5 Regression] Performance regression after operand canonicalization (r216728).

2014-12-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5 Regression] Performance |[5 Regression]

[Bug tree-optimization/64434] [5 Regression] Performance regression after operand canonicalization (r216728).

2014-12-29 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On December 29, 2014 5:56:25 PM CET, ysrumyan at gmail dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64434 --- Comment #8 from Yuri