https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66299
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66299
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66299
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66299
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
1x == 2 can be transformed into x == 1 and that seems like it is not being
done.
Related to bug 15350.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66299
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'd think using a volatile var in the optimization test is highly undesirable,
that can mean stopping optimizations differently between different compilers.
But, the same thing can be
