https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66946
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66946
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66946
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Comment on attachment 36021
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36021
minimal example
written == ((wchar_t) 0xfffd)
Will ever be true or is there some sign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66946
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ok. This just looks like a missing jump threading.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66946
--- Comment #4 from Wilco wdijkstr at arm dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
Comment on attachment 36021 [details]
minimal example
written == ((wchar_t) 0xfffd)
Will ever be true or is there some sign extending going
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66946
--- Comment #1 from Wilco wdijkstr at arm dot com ---
Created attachment 36021
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36021action=edit
minimal example
Minimal example which still reports the spurious warning.
