[Bug tree-optimization/67328] range test rather than single bit test for code testing enum values

2017-06-22 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67328 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/67328] range test rather than single bit test for code testing enum values

2017-06-20 Thread tetra2005 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67328 --- Comment #8 from Yuri Gribov --- Alan,(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #0) > It looks like gcc incorrectly prefers a range test. Alan, can we close this?

[Bug tree-optimization/67328] range test rather than single bit test for code testing enum values

2017-06-13 Thread chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67328 --- Comment #7 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: chefmax Date: Tue Jun 13 11:13:52 2017 New Revision: 249149 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249149=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-13 Yury Gribov gcc/ PR

[Bug tree-optimization/67328] range test rather than single bit test for code testing enum values

2017-01-28 Thread tetra2005 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67328 --- Comment #6 from Yuri Gribov --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #5) > PR 67731 maybe related or dup? Related but not a dup. This bug is caused by frontend folding two bitfield accesses to a single comparison which prevented generation

[Bug tree-optimization/67328] range test rather than single bit test for code testing enum values

2017-01-26 Thread olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67328 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/67328] range test rather than single bit test for code testing enum values

2017-01-25 Thread tetra2005 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67328 Yuri Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/67328] range test rather than single bit test for code testing enum values

2016-09-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67328 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/67328] range test rather than single bit test for code testing enum values

2015-08-25 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67328 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/67328] range test rather than single bit test for code testing enum values

2015-08-25 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67328 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/67328] range test rather than single bit test for code testing enum values

2015-08-23 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67328 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 36247 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36247action=edit testcase from binutils/include/bfdlink.h