[Bug tree-optimization/69196] [5/6/7 Regression] code size regression with jump threading at -O2

2016-12-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4 --- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/69196] [5/6/7 Regression] code size regression with jump threading at -O2

2016-08-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3

[Bug tree-optimization/69196] [5/6/7 Regression] code size regression with jump threading at -O2

2016-05-03 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196 --- Comment #26 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I'm planning to keep it open until I add the code to factor FSM path clones with differing entry edges into a single FSM path clone. At that time we'll want to look at this (and other) BZs to ensure that

[Bug tree-optimization/69196] [5/6/7 Regression] code size regression with jump threading at -O2

2016-05-02 Thread sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196 --- Comment #25 from Sebastian Huber --- With GCC 6.1 there is now only a slight increase in code size compared to GCC 4.9. I am not sure if there is anything left to do on this PR. sparc-rtems4.11-gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/69196] [5/6/7 Regression] code size regression with jump threading at -O2

2016-04-27 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.0 |6.2 --- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek