[Bug tree-optimization/81603] Various compiler UB on very large constant offsets

2018-11-20 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81603 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/81603] Various compiler UB on very large constant offsets

2018-02-01 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81603 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/81603] Various compiler UB on very large constant offsets

2017-09-13 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81603 --- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez --- Author: aldyh Date: Wed Sep 13 16:05:54 2017 New Revision: 252184 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=252184=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81603 * ipa-polymorphic-call.c

[Bug tree-optimization/81603] Various compiler UB on very large constant offsets

2017-07-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81603 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jul 31 08:22:14 2017 New Revision: 250727 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250727=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/81603 * ipa-polymorphic-call.c

[Bug tree-optimization/81603] Various compiler UB on very large constant offsets

2017-07-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81603 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Well, yes - offset_int is basically former double_int and thus good for addresses/offsets measured in bits. Of course in this case why do we need the offset in bits at all? ... That said, we're looking at