https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85158
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85158
>
> --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> As a middle-ground between ints,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85158
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
As a middle-ground between ints, HOST_WIDE_INTs and unlimited precision we have
offset_int, widest_int etc. But perhaps using even that would be too costly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85158
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> There's related PR82494 about the lambda vector operations but yes, this
> code hasn't
> been fixed to avoid overflows and generally expects to operate with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85158
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85158
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85158
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> The above snippet isn't a self-contained program and contains UB, so it is
> unclear how you can get runtime diagnostics for it.
The short snippet of code is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85158
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
