[Bug tree-optimization/85259] [8 Regression] Missing -Wstringop-overflow= since r256683

2018-11-20 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85259 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/85259] [8 Regression] Missing -Wstringop-overflow= since r256683

2018-04-09 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85259 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Target Mileston

[Bug tree-optimization/85259] [8 Regression] Missing -Wstringop-overflow= since r256683

2018-04-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85259 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |8.0.1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/85259] [8 Regression] Missing -Wstringop-overflow= since r256683

2018-04-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85259 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- There are actually yet another couple of bugs at play here. In the test case compiled without -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE, strcpy(buf, "hello ") is folded into a MEM_REF by gimple_fold_builtin_strcpy() without checking

[Bug tree-optimization/85259] [8 Regression] Missing -Wstringop-overflow= since r256683

2018-04-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85259 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/85259] [8 Regression] Missing -Wstringop-overflow= since r256683

2018-04-06 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85259 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED