[Bug tree-optimization/87885] ICE in release_ssa_name_fn with -fprofile-report

2018-11-13 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87885 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/87885] ICE in release_ssa_name_fn with -fprofile-report

2018-11-13 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87885 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Tue Nov 13 15:06:54 2018 New Revision: 266074 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266074=gcc=rev Log: Improve -fprofile-report. 2018-11-13 Martin Liska PR

[Bug tree-optimization/87885] ICE in release_ssa_name_fn with -fprofile-report

2018-11-06 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87885 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/87885] ICE in release_ssa_name_fn with -fprofile-report

2018-11-06 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87885 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- OK, I now recall. The intend was really to have three values - profile before pass was run (which you can see from stats of previous pass) - profile after pass was run - profile after cleanups This is

[Bug tree-optimization/87885] ICE in release_ssa_name_fn with -fprofile-report

2018-11-06 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87885 --- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka --- The patch makes sense to me. I am not sure why it was run after pass but before cleanups originally... Seems like a bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/87885] ICE in release_ssa_name_fn with -fprofile-report

2018-11-06 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87885 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|