[Bug tree-optimization/88915] Try smaller vectorisation factors in scalar fallback

2019-04-09 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88915

Tamar Christina  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |tnfchris at gcc dot 
gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina  ---
I'll be taking a look at this one as a part of GCC 10 as well.

[Bug tree-optimization/88915] Try smaller vectorisation factors in scalar fallback

2019-01-21 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88915

--- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Yeah, the epilogue stuff is on my list of things to revisit for GCC 10.

I think this isn't necessarily about the epilogue (the main vector loop is not
entered here), but rather the scalar fallback.

Unless we merge the fallback and epilogue into one.

[Bug tree-optimization/88915] Try smaller vectorisation factors in scalar fallback

2019-01-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88915

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2019-01-21
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener  ---
Yeah, the epilogue stuff is on my list of things to revisit for GCC 10.