https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90710
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor ---
Here's a smaller test case showing both the problem (first gcc invocation) and
how it can be avoided (second invocation):
$ (set -x && cat pr90710.c && gcc -Og -S -Wall pr90710.c && gcc -Dint=long -Og
-S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90710
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2019-06-02 00:00:00 |2021-4-6
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90710
--- Comment #2 from sagebar at web dot de ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #1)
> We focus most of our effort on avoiding false positives with -O2
> optimization levels. As you lower the optimization level (-Og) you will
> almost
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90710
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
