[Bug tree-optimization/95185] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Failure to optimize specific kind of sign comparison check

2024-03-22 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95185

Jeffrey A. Law  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P2
 CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/95185] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Failure to optimize specific kind of sign comparison check

2023-09-11 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95185

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
   Assignee|pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot 
gnu.org
   Keywords||needs-bisection
Summary|Failure to optimize |[11/12/13/14 Regression]
   |specific kind of sign   |Failure to optimize
   |comparison check|specific kind of sign
   ||comparison check
  Known to work||8.5.0
   Target Milestone|--- |11.5
  Known to fail||9.1.0

--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski  ---
The original testcase is actually a regression.