https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95363
Bug ID: 95363 Summary: [11 regression] bb-slp-pr95271.c fails on arm since gc0e27f72358794692e367363940c6383e9ad1e45 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: clyon at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Since gc0e27f72358794692e367363940c6383e9ad1e45, I've noticed that gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr95271.c fails on arm (that's when it was introduced): FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr95271.c (test for excess errors) Excess errors: /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr95271.c:13:21: warning: left shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr95271.c:13:60: warning: left shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr95271.c:14:38: warning: left shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow] /gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-pr95271.c:15:38: warning: left shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow] Do you want to use 'long long' instead of 'long' for variable 'd'?