https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494
--- Comment #12 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I looked through the test results on all our testers and it looks like
everything is cleaned up now. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa0d8a3e28cd3365a2910884ce3e7cb67b07f866
commit r11-7622-gaa0d8a3e28cd3365a2910884ce3e7cb67b07f866
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6c1d026c3a9109de58d1148e3f54b5273ebb86a
commit r11-7621-gf6c1d026c3a9109de58d1148e3f54b5273ebb86a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d4ad8570c3bab2e145aa7b39ce8c66bafbf1945
commit r11-7620-g9d4ad8570c3bab2e145aa7b39ce8c66bafbf1945
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e393f03b1a73d75901d1bc49c99123bdf534e120
commit r11-6770-ge393f03b1a73d75901d1bc49c99123bdf534e120
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
I guess this folding detail wasn't what the original testcase was supposed to
test. Doing
out[i*4] = (in[i*4] + 2) * 3;
out[i*4 + 1] = (in[i*4 + 2] + 2) * 7;
out[i*4 + 2] = (in[i*4 + 1]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
OK, so for gcc.dg/vect/slp-11b.c we're now doing hybrid vectorization if a { 0
2 1 } load permute is supported. The reason this is needed is that
out[i*4] = (in[i*4] + 2) * 3;
out[i*4 + 1] =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build|powerpc64*-linux-gnu|
Target|powerpc64*-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
