https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #49 from Frédéric Buclin ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #47)
> Another cosmetic issue that I've noticed is that an extra newline is added
> after every quoted comment.
This problem has been reported upstream, see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #48 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #47)
> Another cosmetic issue that I've noticed is that an extra newline is added
> after every quoted comment.
>
> For example:
>
> > test
> reply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #47 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Another cosmetic issue that I've noticed is that an extra newline is added
after every quoted comment.
For example:
test
reply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #44 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Any update on the timestamp issue? It still happens regularly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #45 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #44)
Any update on the timestamp issue? It still happens regularly.
I reported to overseers that the problem was not in Bugzilla,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #46 from Frank Ch. Eigler fche at redhat dot com ---
I can add a workaround in Bugzilla itself, if that helps. Frank?
Please go ahead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #41 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
The GCC bugzilla favicon now shows generic Bugzilla favicon. Previously, it was
a GCC favicon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35409|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #42 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #41)
The GCC bugzilla favicon now shows generic Bugzilla favicon. Previously, it
was a GCC favicon.
Fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #36 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
mpolacek isn't a valid bugzilla user by itself. You always need to type the
whole email, or wait for the completion to appear and select it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #37 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #36)
mpolacek isn't a valid bugzilla user by itself. You always need to type the
whole email, or wait for the completion to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #35 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
CCing people doesn't work anymore.
For example on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66066
when I click edit in the CC List, and add mpolacek and then hit
save
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #38 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
I can confirm the regression. I reported this issue upstream:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1162914
Thanks Markus for catching that! :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #39 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
Bug fixed upstream, and here. :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #40 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks for the quick fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #34 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
My debug code caught the problem. In one of the last bugmails, I got:
Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 14:56:33 +
X-Bugzilla-Debug-Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 14:56:33 +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #32 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
For some reason, DateTime::TimeZone-new(name = 'local') sometimes returns
Asia/Kolkata, which explains the -05:30 offset observed in the famous 2% of
bugmails with an incorrect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #33 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
I found only one user account which uses the Asia/Kolkata timezone. But no
reason why this would interact with the local timezone.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #30 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
(I added some debug code to Bugzilla to try to understand what's wrong. Just
ignore this email.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #31 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
(ignore this one as well)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #27 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
Newsgroups:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #28 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
Maybe is this a coincidence, but all bugmails I found which have a wrong
timestamp have something in common. First of all, the offset is *always* the
same: -05:30. Then, it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #29 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
One more, at :45:
Matt Breedlove 2015-04-30 20:45:32 UTC
I now have no doubt that this is not a coincidence.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #25 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
Did this problem disappear? Or are there still some bugmails today with a wrong
timestamp?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #26 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: christian.eggers at kathrein dot de gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org
Newsgroups:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #19 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
See for example:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.binutils.bugs/19841/focus=19855
When this thread is displayed in mutt the highlighted messages appears
in the wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #18 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
One thing I've noticed is that the emails to gcc-bugs now use the local time
of the user. So the sorting isn't correct anymore if people from different
time zones comment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #20 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
I don't think this has anything to do with the timezone of the commenter. For
example the mail for comment #19 has the date Tue, 28 Apr 2015 16:28:19 +
(which is correct), but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #22 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Frédéric Buclin from comment #21)
Markus, did you change your timezone preference between comments 18 and 19?
If yes, which ones did you select?
No. But the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #23 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #22)
No. But the question makes no sense, because we're talking about mails that
bugzilla automatically sends to the bug mailing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #21 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
Markus, did you change your timezone preference between comments 18 and 19? If
yes, which ones did you select?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #24 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Frédéric Buclin from comment #23)
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #22)
No. But the question makes no sense, because we're talking about mails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35353|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #17 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
Patch applied. Mikael, the next time you upload a f90 script, Bugzilla will
correctly detect it as text/plain. Note that it won't convert the MIME type of
already uploaded
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #13 from Frank Ch. Eigler fche at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #12)
Hello, not sure this is due to the upgrade, but the attachment
appears empty in the page:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #15 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Frédéric Buclin from comment #14)
That's unrelated to the upgrade. Your web browser is unable to display files
of type text/x-fortran, that's why.
What you want is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #14 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #12)
Hello, not sure this is due to the upgrade, but the attachment
appears empty in the page:
That's unrelated to the upgrade. Your
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35354|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #9 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
Created attachment 35354
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35354action=edit
GCC extension for 5.0, v2
And the corresponding new extension.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34735|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #5 from Frank Ch. Eigler fche at redhat dot com ---
The current .git repos are there as a backup.
I'll move them out of the way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #4 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
Bugzilla 5.0 is not available from bzr, it requires git. But there is already a
.git repository in the root bugzilla/ directory, which requires root
permissions to be read. What
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #7 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
Created attachment 34736
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34736action=edit
GCC extension for 5.0, v1
This is exactly the same GCC extension as for 4.4.5. So
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #6 from Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net ---
Created attachment 34735
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34735action=edit
GCC patch for 5.0, v1
No code changes compared to 4.4, but the patch for 4.4 didn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Frédéric Buclin LpSolit at netscape dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
--- Comment #3 from Frank Ch. Eigler fche at redhat dot com ---
If the spammer problem is brought under better control with bz5, sure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
49 matches
Mail list logo
