[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

2019-02-07 Thread mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 --- Comment #6 from MarkEggleston --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5) > (In reply to MarkEggleston from comment #3) > > Looks like I missed MIN with literals. > > > > integer(2) :: a2 > > integer(4) :: a4 > > write(*,*) kind(max(7,

[Bug tree-optimization/89223] [7/8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in int_cst_value, at tree.c:11226

2019-02-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89223 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- The #c9 patch looks good, but I don't view #c5 as papering over issues, but rather as an optimization and desirable change. The expansion of ARRAY_REFs is done through calling get_inner_reference and

[Bug target/87532] bad results from vec_extract(unsigned char, foo) dependent upon function inline

2019-02-07 Thread kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87532 --- Comment #9 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- The new tests proposed by as part of this PR represent illegal code and are properly rejected by the compiler. However, the compiler is not currently rejecting the following test program even

[Bug middle-end/89230] Bogus uninited usage warning

2019-02-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89230 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/83581] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_LOOP_VECTORIZED, at internal-fn.c:2397

2019-02-07 Thread gsocshubham at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83581 Shubham Narlawar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gsocshubham at gmail dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/88919] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails

2019-02-07 Thread seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 --- Comment #17 from Bill Seurer --- On 02/07/19 09:47, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 > > Tamar Christina changed: > > What|Removed |Added >

[Bug rtl-optimization/89234] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in get_eh_region_and_lp_from_rtx at gcc/except.c:1824

2019-02-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89234 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 45632 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45632=edit gcc9-pr89234.patch Full untested patch.

[Bug middle-end/89230] Bogus uninited usage warning

2019-02-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89230 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/83581] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_LOOP_VECTORIZED, at internal-fn.c:2397

2019-02-07 Thread gsocshubham at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83581 --- Comment #6 from Shubham Narlawar --- Created attachment 45637 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45637=edit Preprocessed code of file named "work23_crash1.c" internal compiler error: in expand_LOOP_VECTORIZED, at

[Bug target/89229] [7/8/9 Regression] Unnecessary ZMM in movoi_internal_avx/movti_internal

2019-02-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89229 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Another problem: (cond [(ior (match_operand 0 "ext_sse_reg_operand") (match_operand 1 "ext_sse_reg_operand")) (const_string "XI") We shouldn't use XI for

[Bug tree-optimization/88919] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails

2019-02-07 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added CC|tamar.christina at arm dot com | --- Comment #15 from Tamar

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

2019-02-07 Thread mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 --- Comment #8 from MarkEggleston --- (In reply to kargl from comment #7) > (In reply to MarkEggleston from comment #0) > > Created attachment 45626 [details] > > Add GNU extension notes to DIM, MOD, MODULO, MAX and MIN > > > > Missing notes

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

2019-02-07 Thread mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 --- Comment #9 from MarkEggleston --- (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5) > (In reply to MarkEggleston from comment #3) > > Looks like I missed MIN with literals. > > > > integer(2) :: a2 > > integer(4) :: a4 > > write(*,*) kind(max(7,

[Bug tree-optimization/88919] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails

2019-02-07 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

2019-02-07 Thread mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 --- Comment #11 from MarkEggleston --- Created attachment 45634 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45634=edit Updated change log for gcc/fortran for patch Change no longer affects MAX and MIN.

[Bug go/89019] LTO and gccgo cause ICE during free_lang_data

2019-02-07 Thread nikhil.benesch at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89019 Nikhil Benesch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/89235] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected block, have in inlining_chain_to_json, at optinfo-emit-json.cc:285

2019-02-07 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89235 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/88919] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails

2019-02-07 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 --- Comment #18 from Tamar Christina --- Ah no worries, I was just wondering if there was some explicit action that was wanted from me :)

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

2019-02-07 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

2019-02-07 Thread mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 MarkEggleston changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #45629|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/54855] Unnecessary duplication when performing scalar operation on vector element

2019-02-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54855 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|kirill.yukhin at intel dot com |hjl.tools at gmail dot com,

[Bug target/89229] [7/8/9 Regression] Unnecessary ZMM in movoi_internal_avx/movti_internal

2019-02-07 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89229 --- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Feb 7 17:58:19 2019 New Revision: 268657 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268657=gcc=rev Log: i386: Fix typo in *movoi_internal_avx/movti_internal PR

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

2019-02-07 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/87645] [7 Regression] gcc hangs up on vr_values::vrp_visit_assignment_or_call

2019-02-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87645 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- *** Bug 89238 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/89238] cc1 hangs after

2019-02-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89238 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/88714] [9 regression] bootstrap comparison failure on armv7l since r265398

2019-02-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88714 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/89225] [9 Regression] LRA hang on ppc64le compiling glibc starting with r268404

2019-02-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89225 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89241] [9 Regression] ICE in enclosing_instantiation_of, at cp/pt.c:13380

2019-02-07 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89241 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Started with that fix, actually: r268424.

[Bug tree-optimization/88919] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails

2019-02-07 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 --- Comment #14 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I did not add you to the CC list.

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

2019-02-07 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug ipa/88755] [9 Regression] ICE in compute_fn_summary, at ipa-fnsummary.c:2513 since r267601

2019-02-07 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88755 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka --- tp_sum is function that should be inlined. The problem is that its estimated size after inlining a function call within tp_sum is 75. We used to estimate that the speedup for inlining function is large and

[Bug bootstrap/84402] [meta] GCC build system: parallelism bottleneck

2019-02-07 Thread giuliano.belinassi at usp dot br
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84402 --- Comment #29 from Giuliano Belinassi --- > No, the proper fix would be to split the generated files and compile them in > parallel. Similarly for all the insn-*.c generated files. That would the > proper fix. Indeed. However, I am working

[Bug c++/89241] New: ICE in enclosing_instantiation_of, at cp/pt.c:13380

2019-02-07 Thread larsbj at gullik dot net
c,c++ Thread model: posix gcc version 9.0.1 20190207 (experimental) (GCC) /opt/gcc/gcc-9/bin/g++ -c bug3.cpp bug3.cpp: In instantiation of ‘o< >::m_fn3() [with = int]:: [with auto:1 = int; auto:2 = int]’: bug3.cpp:4:27: required by substitution of ‘template decltype (g(1, 2)) ag(e) [w

[Bug c++/89241] [9 Regression] ICE in enclosing_instantiation_of, at cp/pt.c:13380

2019-02-07 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89241 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.0 Summary|ICE in

[Bug fortran/89240] Discrepancy in the return kind of MAX and MIN between all literal input parameters and input parameters that are variables

2019-02-07 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89240 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/78314] [aarch64] ieee_support_halting does not report unsupported fpu traps correctly

2019-02-07 Thread sje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78314 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #22

[Bug fortran/52789] gfortran sets -Wunused-parameter in the C sense as well as the Fortran sense

2019-02-07 Thread dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52789 --- Comment #8 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Thu Feb 7 17:40:29 2019 New Revision: 268656 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268656=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-07 Dominique d'Humieres PR fortran/52789

[Bug rtl-optimization/89234] [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in get_eh_region_and_lp_from_rtx at gcc/except.c:1824

2019-02-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89234 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|target

[Bug fortran/52789] gfortran sets -Wunused-parameter in the C sense as well as the Fortran sense

2019-02-07 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52789 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/83581] [8 Regression] ICE in expand_LOOP_VECTORIZED, at internal-fn.c:2397

2019-02-07 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83581 --- Comment #7 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Shubham Narlawar from comment #5) > Is this the same bug as above filed? Please don't hijack random PRs resolved w/ proper fixes long ago. There's one open PR filed for an ICE in

[Bug middle-end/89230] Bogus uninited usage warning

2019-02-07 Thread lavr at ncbi dot nlm.nih.gov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89230 --- Comment #2 from lavr at ncbi dot nlm.nih.gov --- Okay, but "d" points to a clearly separate storage on stack within a local frame. None of the pointers passed to (s)printf() relate to that area (either they are also clearly separate within

[Bug c++/89239] gcc claims that this expression is not constexpr

2019-02-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89239 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/89242] New: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184 (error: dominator of 7 should be 5, not 2)

2019-02-07 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89242 Bug ID: 89242 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1184 (error: dominator of 7 should be 5, not 2) Product: gcc Version: 9.0

[Bug fortran/89240] New: Discrepancy in the return kind of MAX and MIN between all literal input parameters and input parameters that are variables

2019-02-07 Thread mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89240 Bug ID: 89240 Summary: Discrepancy in the return kind of MAX and MIN between all literal input parameters and input parameters that are variables Product: gcc

[Bug debug/86964] Too many debug symbols included, especially for extern globals

2019-02-07 Thread Johan.karlsson at enea dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86964 --- Comment #6 from Johan.karlsson at enea dot com --- Created attachment 45636 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45636=edit Patch to enable skip unused extern variables. I'm attaching a patch that I've been working on. It

[Bug c++/89241] ICE in enclosing_instantiation_of, at cp/pt.c:13380

2019-02-07 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89241 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/89235] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected block, have in inlining_chain_to_json, at optinfo-emit-json.cc:285

2019-02-07 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89235 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Candidate patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-02/msg00402.html

[Bug c++/82877] negative array index accepted in a pointer difference expression in constexpr context

2019-02-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82877 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Clang issues the expected errors, as does ICC: $ clang -S pr82877.C pr82877.C:1:15: error: constexpr function never produces a constant expression [-Winvalid-constexpr] constexpr int f ()

[Bug c++/89151] SFINAE-disabled member hides another

2019-02-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89151 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/82877] negative array index accepted in a pointer difference expression in constexpr context

2019-02-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82877 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||7.3.0, 8.2.0, 9.0 --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c/89051] -Wno-error= does not work for warning groups

2019-02-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89051 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89244] New: __builtin_is_constant_evaluated not documented

2019-02-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89244 Bug ID: 89244 Summary: __builtin_is_constant_evaluated not documented Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/88977] __builtin_is_constant_evaluated() as function template argument causes substitution failure

2019-02-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88977 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- I had missed the example is missing a semicolon after the definition of X (the error could use improvement). With the semicolon added, the example is accepted (it's even in the test suite). The equivalent

[Bug c/89051] -Wno-error= does not work for warning groups

2019-02-07 Thread m101010a at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89051 --- Comment #2 from m101010a at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1) > I don't think GCC has an internal representation of warning groups It has to have some representation, because it can tell which warning group is more

[Bug c++/52830] ICE: "canonical types differ for identical types ..." when attempting SFINAE with member type

2019-02-07 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52830 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/89011] member function pointer template argument with initialization by constant generates ICE

2019-02-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89011 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/89243] New: ICE in new test case g++.dg/opt/pr89188.C from r268647

2019-02-07 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89243 Bug ID: 89243 Summary: ICE in new test case g++.dg/opt/pr89188.C from r268647 Product: gcc Version: 8.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/89149] Out of bounds array access not detected as ill-formed in a constant expression context in some cases

2019-02-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89149 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug target/69061] Huge (~7GB of them) Static arrays are not fully usable on Darwin

2019-02-07 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69061 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/87532] bad results from vec_extract(unsigned char, foo) dependent upon function inline

2019-02-07 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87532 --- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt --- Hm. Hang on while I look at some history.

[Bug c++/89217] [9 Regression] ICE tree check: expected constructor, have error_mark in split_nonconstant_init_1

2019-02-07 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89217 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek

[Bug target/89245] New: [MIPS] v1 is assigned in jalr delay slot for later use at -Os

2019-02-07 Thread i...@mobile-stream.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89245 Bug ID: 89245 Summary: [MIPS] v1 is assigned in jalr delay slot for later use at -Os Product: gcc Version: 8.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/89231] Bogus "ambiguous template instantiation" error for variadic nested class

2019-02-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89231 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug sanitizer/88997] Implicit constructors created with line numbers

2019-02-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88997 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/87532] bad results from vec_extract(unsigned char, foo) dependent upon function inline

2019-02-07 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87532 --- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt --- Let me take back what I said earlier. We've had full support for vec_extract with a variable second argument for quite a long time. So let me try again responding to comment #4. We have special-case code

[Bug fortran/68940] -Wno-error=compare-reals not working

2019-02-07 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68940 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89074] valid pointer equality constexpr comparison rejected

2019-02-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89074 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/86637] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected block, have in inlining_chain_to_json, at optinfo-emit-json.cc:293

2019-02-07 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86637 --- Comment #13 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu Feb 7 23:00:18 2019 New Revision: 268659 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268659=gcc=rev Log: Fix more ICEs in -fsave-optimization-record (PR tree-optimization/89235) PR

[Bug c++/88977] __builtin_is_constant_evaluated() as function template argument causes substitution failure

2019-02-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88977 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/89235] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected block, have in inlining_chain_to_json, at optinfo-emit-json.cc:285

2019-02-07 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89235 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Thu Feb 7 23:00:18 2019 New Revision: 268659 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268659=gcc=rev Log: Fix more ICEs in -fsave-optimization-record (PR tree-optimization/89235) PR

[Bug c++/89237] Partial specialization incorrectly marked as ambiguous

2019-02-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89237 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c/89153] internal compiler error: in assign_stack_local_1, at function.c:409

2019-02-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89153 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89050] GCC sometimes requires this to be captured when doing overload resolution but selecting a static member function

2019-02-07 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89050 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/89235] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected block, have in inlining_chain_to_json, at optinfo-emit-json.cc:285

2019-02-07 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89235 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/81552] -finit-integer=n is restricted to 32-bit INTEGER.

2019-02-07 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81552 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from

[Bug lto/89246] New: LTO produces references to cloned symbols which the compiler failed to clone

2019-02-07 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89246 Bug ID: 89246 Summary: LTO produces references to cloned symbols which the compiler failed to clone Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug libbacktrace/78063] libbacktrace fails to handle cross CU DW_AT_abstract_origin

2019-02-07 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78063 --- Comment #7 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Fri Feb 8 05:55:44 2019 New Revision: 268663 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268663=gcc=rev Log: [libbacktrace] Handle DW_FORM_ref_addr Add handling of the DW_FORM_ref_addr

[Bug target/84762] GCC for PowerPC32 violates the SysV ABI spec for small struct returns

2019-02-07 Thread lokeshjanghel91 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84762 Lokesh Janghel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lokeshjanghel91 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/88427] [9 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have plus_expr in get_len, at tree.h:5617

2019-02-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88427 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 8 07:40:31 2019 New Revision: 268665 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268665=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-08 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2018-12-10

[Bug tree-optimization/88217] [8 Regression] Compile time and memory hog w/ -O2 -fstrict-enums -fno-tree-forwprop -fno-tree-fre

2019-02-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88217 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/88217] [8 Regression] Compile time and memory hog w/ -O2 -fstrict-enums -fno-tree-forwprop -fno-tree-fre

2019-02-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88217 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 8 07:40:31 2019 New Revision: 268665 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268665=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-08 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2018-12-10

[Bug tree-optimization/88149] [7/8 Regression] ICE in vect_transform_stmt since r265959

2019-02-07 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88149 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Feb 8 07:40:31 2019 New Revision: 268665 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268665=gcc=rev Log: 2019-02-08 Richard Biener Backport from mainline 2018-12-10

[Bug c++/89244] __builtin_is_constant_evaluated not documented

2019-02-07 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89244 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/89024] [7 Regression] ICE testing convertibility of incomplete enumeration types

2019-02-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89024 --- Comment #11 from Christophe Lyon --- Author: clyon Date: Thu Feb 7 10:21:11 2019 New Revision: 268613 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268613=gcc=rev Log: [testsuite] Fix g++.dg/cpp0x/enum37.C testcase. 2019-02-07 Christophe Lyon

[Bug c++/89232] c++: Fail to build when and the noreturn keyword is used

2019-02-07 Thread pere at hungry dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89232 --- Comment #2 from pere at hungry dot com --- Aha. I thought valid C code would also be valid C++ code, and this belief became stronger when clang (and clang++) would accept the code. Is there a list of C headers not supported by C++?

[Bug target/89234] ICE in get_eh_region_and_lp_from_rtx at gcc/except.c:1824

2019-02-07 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89234 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Target|ppc64le-linux-gnu, |powerpc*-*-*

[Bug target/89234] ICE in get_eh_region_and_lp_from_rtx at gcc/except.c:1824

2019-02-07 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89234 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- "Works fine for C"... With the error error: can't mix operands of decimal float and other float types that is.

[Bug target/88850] [9 Regression] Hard register coming out of expand causing reload to fail.

2019-02-07 Thread tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88850 Tamar Christina changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/89232] c++: Fail to build when and the noreturn keyword is used

2019-02-07 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89232 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- The standard C++ headers are listed at: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/header It does have an "Unsupported C headers" section: https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/header#Unsupported_C_headers "The C

[Bug middle-end/87118] ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7862

2019-02-07 Thread gsocsameeran at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87118 --- Comment #3 from Sameeran Joshi --- comfirmed on gcc-9.0 Currently, I tested on gcc-9.0, I could reproduce the same there. I found the crash function name differs this time, from the previous function name, whereas the backtrack remains the

[Bug tree-optimization/89235] New: ICE: tree check: expected block, have in inlining_chain_to_json, at optinfo-emit-json.cc:285

2019-02-07 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89235 Bug ID: 89235 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected block, have in inlining_chain_to_json, at optinfo-emit-json.cc:285 Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/86960] [8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in coerce_template_parms

2019-02-07 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86960 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/86960] [8/9 Regression] internal compiler error: in coerce_template_parms

2019-02-07 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86960 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva --- AFAICT the problem is that we do not substitute the type pack into the arg pack when specializing the enclosing template. That specialization removes one template level from the nested template, so we

[Bug fortran/89236] New: Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

2019-02-07 Thread mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 Bug ID: 89236 Summary: Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

2019-02-07 Thread mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 --- Comment #1 from MarkEggleston --- Created attachment 45627 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45627=edit Change log for gcc/fortran for patch No date as it should inserted when patch is committed.

[Bug c++/89024] [7 Regression] ICE testing convertibility of incomplete enumeration types

2019-02-07 Thread clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89024 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

2019-02-07 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/89232] c++: Fail to build when and the noreturn keyword is used

2019-02-07 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89232 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- The reason you get a warning from cc (and clang) is that your function sometimes returns, which would lead to undefined behaviour. You are misusing noreturn. The noreturn specifier/attribute means the

[Bug fortran/89236] Intrinsic documentation changes for intrinsics affected by GNU extension

2019-02-07 Thread mark.eggleston at codethink dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89236 --- Comment #3 from MarkEggleston --- Looks like I missed MIN with literals. integer(2) :: a2 integer(4) :: a4 write(*,*) kind(max(7, 9_1)) write(*,*) kind(max(7_2, 9)) write(*,*) kind(max(a2, a4)) write(*,*) kind(min(7_2, 9)) write(*,*)

[Bug tree-optimization/88919] New test case gcc.dg/vect/pr88903-1.c in r268076 fails

2019-02-07 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 6 Feb 2019, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88919 > > Bill Schmidt changed: > >What|Removed |Added

  1   2   >