--- Comment #9 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-08-20 06:01 ---
Subject: Bug number PR24866
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00711.html
--
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-08-20 06:05 ---
Subject: Bug number PR25077
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00712.html
--
--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-08-20 07:00 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/28505
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00714.html
--
--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-08-20 07:00 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/28741
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00715.html
--
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-08-20 07:32 ---
Subject: Bug number PR25077
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00716.html
--
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-08-20 07:33 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c++/26269
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00710.html
--
--- Comment #1 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-08-20 07:33 ---
Subject: Bug number PR c/27953
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00708.html
--
--- Comment #8 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-08-20 07:35 ---
Subject: Bug number PR tree-optimization/24888
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00717.html
--
--- Comment #10 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-08-20 07:45 ---
Subject: Bug number PR24866
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00719.html
--
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 28630
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR fortran/28601
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 28735
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:20 ---
Subject: Bug 28601
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR fortran/28601
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 20886
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR fortran/28601
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 28762
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR fortran/28601
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 28771
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR fortran/28601
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 28425
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR fortran/28601
--- Comment #19 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 18111
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 28496
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR fortran/28601
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:21 ---
Subject: Bug 28660
Author: pault
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:20:26 2006
New Revision: 116269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116269
Log:
2006-08-20 Paul Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #2 from dannysmith at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 08:46
---
Subject: Bug 28648
Author: dannysmith
Date: Sun Aug 20 08:46:13 2006
New Revision: 116270
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116270
Log:
PR target/28648 c:
* tree.c
--- Comment #3 from dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2006-08-20
08:48 ---
Fixed on trunk.
--
dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Step to reproduce:
1) Download SpiderMonkey sources from:
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/js/js-1.5.tar.gz
2) Build the stand alone version, by typing: 'Make -f Makefile.ref'.
Output:
...
...
...
gcc -o Linux_All_DBG.OBJ/jscpucfg.o -c -Wall -Wno-format -DGCC_OPT_BUG -g
-DXP_UNIX -DSVR4
--
yair at finjan dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28782
The attached test case has been reported to fail to compile in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
channel. I am not even sure if it is valid or not, but since its author didn't
seem to report it and it is an ICE across all compilers I have, I report it
instead of the author.
The problem looks like this:
$
--- Comment #1 from v dot haisman at sh dot cvut dot cz 2006-08-20 09:00
---
Created an attachment (id=12101)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12101action=view)
Original test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28783
--- Comment #2 from v dot haisman at sh dot cvut dot cz 2006-08-20 09:02
---
Created an attachment (id=12102)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12102action=view)
Very lightly reduced preprocessed source.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28783
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 09:08 ---
Happens with 3.4, 4.0, 4.1 and mainline, reducing.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 09:14 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26881 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 09:14
---
*** Bug 28782 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 09:22 ---
Subject: Bug 25828
Author: jb
Date: Sun Aug 20 09:22:04 2006
New Revision: 116271
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116271
Log:
2006-08-20 Janne Blomqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
Since about 3 weeks bootstrap is failing due to comparison failure on
java/decl.o (no other object file is affected). It first started with r115810,
then went away with r115850, but reoccurred with r115851. Since then it
reoccurred often but irregularily. Bootstrap is currently failing for
--- Comment #1 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-08-20 09:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=12103)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12103action=view)
Diff of objdump -d output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28784
--- Comment #11 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2006-08-20 12:42 ---
Subject: Re: externally_visible attribute not effective with prior declaration
of symbol.
Is there any reason why process_function_and_variable_attributes is called
at the end of each TU rather than when all TUs were
--- Comment #18 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2006-08-20 12:47 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] internal compiler error in dwarf2out_finish
(In reply to comment #14)
Any news on the patch?
Sadly we are having just tip of the iceberg here. The patch to deffer
output of debug
--- Comment #12 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 12:53 ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Subject: Re: externally_visible attribute not effective with prior
declaration
of symbol.
Is there any reason why process_function_and_variable_attributes is called
at the end of
--- Comment #13 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2006-08-20 12:59 ---
Subject: Re: externally_visible attribute not effective with prior declaration
of symbol.
If this is really true, then there are several bugs (in the FEs?) because
there
are numerous occurances where
--- Comment #14 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2006-08-20 13:12 ---
Subject: Re: externally_visible attribute not effective with prior declaration
of symbol.
Hi,
this is patch I am testing now. Can you think of way to break it
(again? :))
The whole thing is a lot more sliperly than I
--- Comment #15 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 13:15 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Subject: Re: externally_visible attribute not effective with prior
declaration
of symbol.
If this is really true, then there are several bugs (in the FEs?) because
there
are
--- Comment #2 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-08-20 14:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=12104)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12104action=view)
Diff of compiler dumps
All dumps before mach are identical.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28784
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 14:25 ---
Confirmed. Reduced testcase:
namespace boost{
namespace lambda {
template class T0, class T1 class tuple;
template int I struct placeholder {};
template int I, class Act class action;
template
--- Comment #3 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-08-20 14:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=12105)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12105action=view)
stage3 mach dump
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28784
--- Comment #18 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2006-08-20
14:37 ---
With the latest changes to gcc/fortran/trans-expr.c the current proposed patch
no longer applies. The code which is tangling up the patch is...
***
*** 2664,2683
}
else if
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 15:15 ---
Confirmed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 15:20 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 13740 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 15:20
---
*** Bug 28783 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-08-20 15:24 ---
The bug is very sensitive on the environment size. Adding -da makes it go
away, adding -da -da makes it reappear. Looks like some decision is made on
the low bits of an address.
--
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 15:30 ---
Compile time without leafify is comparable to 3.4 for mainline now. Still we
have a memory usage regression.
Execution times (seconds)
garbage collection: 3.96 ( 4%) usr 0.09 ( 1%) sys 4.04 ( 3%) wall
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 15:39 ---
I really don't think this is a regression, this is most likely related to PR
20586 or PR 28752.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 16:24
---
(In reply to comment #6)
Eric, can this bug be closed as FIXED now?
Yes, I would say so.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 16:44 ---
Caused by
2006-04-02 Sebastian Pop [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
+ * tree-chrec.h (build_polynomial_chrec): Insert an assert to check
+ the types of the operands.
...
for the testcase in comment #6 we have
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 16:48
---
No this was caused by:
2006-08-16 Zdenek Dvorak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* tree-scalar-evolution.c (fold_used_pointer_cast, pointer_offset_p,
fold_used_pointer, pointer_used_p): New functions.
as
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 17:29 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 17:29 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #19 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 17:38
---
Created an attachment (id=12106)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12106action=view)
Updated patch
Fixes the conflicts with recently committed patches.
--
eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 17:45 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 17:48 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 17:50 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 18:08 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 18:08 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 18:09 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28496
--- Comment #20 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 18:10 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 18:11 ---
Fixed
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 18:13 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 18:47 ---
Subject: Bug 28779
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Aug 20 18:46:54 2006
New Revision: 116274
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=116274
Log:
PR middle-end/28779
* ipa-inline.c
Using friend functions into template classes, I get an internal error.
GNU C++ version 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5363) (powerpc-apple-darwin8)
compiled by GNU C version 4.0.1 (Apple Computer, Inc. build 5363).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=65 --param
--- Comment #1 from smirolo at hotmail dot com 2006-08-20 18:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=12107)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12107action=view)
.ii and .log (stdout/stderr) files
compilation command line:
g++ -v --save-temps -g -O0 -I../../include -I.
--- Comment #2 from smirolo at hotmail dot com 2006-08-20 19:06 ---
Actually, I have the following two definitions:
friend vertex_descriptor
source( const edge_descriptor e, const viewAsGraph g );
friend const vertex_descriptor
source( const edge_descriptor e, const
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-08-20 20:20 ---
Subject: Bug number PR25102
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-08/msg00729.html
--
--- Comment #3 from tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
2006-08-20 20:51 ---
Besides zero initialization (of Real, complex, integer, (what about logical?)),
a initialization to a (signaling) NaN (for complex, real) would be also nice to
find uninitialized variables.
--
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28493
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28574
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 22:25
---
FRV is not a primary or secondary target.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28588
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28595
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28621
--- Comment #9 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 22:29
---
It is definitely a bug to change the ABI with -Os. Since GCC relies on the
stack being 16-byte aligned, -Os must in fact honor that requirement.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27537
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 22:30
---
Alpha is not a primary or secondary platform.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-20 22:31
---
Until a bug is demonstrated with the current sourcebase, this is not a
priority.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28639
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28641
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28642
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28659
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28663
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28671
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28672
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28675
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28683
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28692
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
Priority|P3
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28706
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28709
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28712
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28736
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28737
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28738
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28739
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28740
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28741
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28742
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28743
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
