--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 06:47 ---
PR 18553.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn|
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 08:36 ---
Subject: Bug 25519
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 16 08:36:03 2006
New Revision: 117774
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117774
Log:
2006-10-16 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 08:39 ---
Subject: Bug 25519
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 16 08:38:52 2006
New Revision: 117775
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117775
Log:
2006-10-16 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 08:40 ---
Subject: Bug 25519
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 16 08:40:32 2006
New Revision: 117776
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117776
Log:
2006-10-16 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 08:41 ---
SSE2 builtins are now documented, so not a regression anymore. Still a
paragraph mentioning the intrinsics could improve the situation.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 09:36
---
I'll take care of this. (Bootstrap running)
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 09:58 ---
Subject: Bug 29091
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Oct 16 09:58:48 2006
New Revision: 117779
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117779
Log:
PR c/29091
* varasm.c (output_constant): If
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 10:16 ---
Differences mainline vs. 4.1.x are
@@ -8,14 +8,19 @@
test:
pushl %ebp
movl%esp, %ebp
- subl$40, %esp
- movss 12(%ebp), %xmm1
- movaps %xmm1, %xmm2
- unpcklps
--- Comment #11 from Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de
2006-10-16 10:52 ---
Subject: Re: ICE in operand_subword_force, at
emit-rtl.c:1353
franke dot daniel at gmail dot com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
Sat, 14 Oct 2006:
Don't know whether it makes any
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 11:18
---
Subject: Bug 27184
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 16 11:18:28 2006
New Revision: 117782
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117782
Log:
2006-10-16 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 11:19
---
Fixed on the 4.1 branch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 11:25 ---
Subject: Bug 29119
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 16 11:25:18 2006
New Revision: 117783
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117783
Log:
2006-10-16 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 11:25
---
Fixed on the 4.1 branch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 11:35 ---
Subject: Bug 28960
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 16 11:34:44 2006
New Revision: 117784
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117784
Log:
2006-10-16 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 11:35 ---
Subject: Bug 28825
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 16 11:34:44 2006
New Revision: 117784
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117784
Log:
2006-10-16 Richard Guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 11:35 ---
Fixed on the 4.1 branch.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 12:07 ---
This is a bug in loop.c
bb 0:
pretmp.61 = q - 1;
outgo = 0;
L0:;
outgo.62 = outgo + 1;
outgo = MIN_EXPR pretmp.61, outgo.62;
j = tar (outgo * bcount);
if (j != -1) goto L0; else goto L4;
L4:;
--- Comment #3 from dir at lanl dot gov 2006-10-16 12:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=12442)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12442action=view)
config.log file from gfortran/ibin/powerpc-apple-darwin8.7.0/libjava
--
--- Comment #4 from dir at lanl dot gov 2006-10-16 12:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=12443)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12443action=view)
config.log file from /Users/dir/gfortran/ibin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29460
--- Comment #5 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-10-16 12:47 ---
this is a dup of PR25026.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29460
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 13:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=12444)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12444action=view)
Full patch and testcase for this PR
The pigeon seems to have got lost on the way to submit this patch to GNU
--- Comment #1 from tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
2006-10-16 13:34 ---
Note that there is a change in meaning:
BOZ-everywhere extension:
a = real(z'F')
is the same as real(int(z'F')) = 15.0
(This is what gfortran does and Intel does by default)
Fortran 2003:
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 13:37 ---
Happens during inlining, so I guess one of the strip-useless-type-conversion
patches caused this.
But initialize_inlined_parameters shouldn't call into the frontend again here:
/* Find the initializer. */
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 13:46 ---
I'm testing complete removal of the langhook.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29478
--- Comment #1 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 14:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=12445)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12445action=view)
Simple fix, testcase and ChangeLog entries.
I'll submit this tonight.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 14:06 ---
Paolo you are correct, non-build testing is at issue. I'm trying to fix...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29095
--- Comment #15 from amacleod at redhat dot com 2006-10-16 14:36 ---
Or we can just backport the fix from mainline to 4.1 which changes the
immediate use iterators and eliminates this kind of problem. Bug 26854 and a
couple of small follow up patches on 4/28 and 5/2. They've been in
--- Comment #2 from mircea_lutic at yahoo dot com 2006-10-16 14:47 ---
it was indeed due to using to sco make.
Sorry for rushing.
Thank you,
Mircea.
--
mircea_lutic at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Dependency creation fails for libcpp on OpenUnix 8.5.
Surprisingly enough the previous phases of the gcc bootstrap work well enough
and also seemed to do some dependency work.
The cc on Caldera OpenUnix 8.5 can generate dependencies but it's not used for
this purpose. Here is the man :
-H
--- Comment #2 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 15:22 ---
ehm, this is the same with any warning/error message? why would this case be
special?
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-10-16 15:25 ---
Subject: Bug number PR29392
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00804.html
--
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mueller at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-10-16 15:30 ---
Subject: Bug number PR29451
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00805.html
--
--- Comment #4 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 15:34 ---
use -Woverloaded-virtual
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|trivial |minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24525
--- Comment #14 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 15:37
---
*** Bug 26298 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 15:37 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26167 ***
--
mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2006-10-16 15:38 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
ehm, this is the same with any warning/error message? why would this case be
special?
I never noticed before, but it would still be nice to get this changed.
--
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 15:40 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25026 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 15:40 ---
*** Bug 29460 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 15:46 ---
The configure check in libcpp is based on automake's code. Do you know if they
support SCO's cc dependencies yet?
Note you should also read README.SCO.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29482
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.2.0 |4.1.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28825
The following little testcase
class Foo {
public:
void bar() const;
static const double TOL = 1e-14;
};
void Foo::bar() const
{
double tol = -TOL;
}
int main(){}
produces the error message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/dune_projects/uggridtest$ g++ test.cc
/tmp/cco39MFe.o: In function
--- Comment #5 from dir at lanl dot gov 2006-10-16 15:53 ---
powerpc-apple-darwin8.7.0 does not come with 64 bit libraries for x-windows -
is there some way to turn of the 64 bit branch of the build ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 15:54 ---
This is not a bug, you still need to have a memory location for Foo::TOL for
this to be valid code.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
static inline __attribute__((always_inline))
void bar (void)
{
addr:;
static const unsigned long b __attribute__((__used__))
__attribute__((section(btable)))
= (unsigned long) addr;
asm ( : : m (b));
}
void foo (void)
{
bar ();
}
generates at -O and higher a reference to undefined
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 16:06 ---
Doesn't work out. It looks like we depend on its side-effects in some
testcases:
FAIL: gcc.dg/assign-warn-3.c (test for warnings, line 9)
FAIL: gcc.dg/assign-warn-3.c (test for warnings, line 13)
FAIL:
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 16:06 ---
Confirmed.
generates at -O and higher a reference to undefined local label
No it generates an undefined local label at all levels of optimization in 4.0.x
and above (there was a bug about not supporting used on
Hi,
this testcase fails to produce a return value missing diagnostic:
=== Cut ===
class test
{
bool fii(test* other)
{
if (!other) return false;
}
};
=== Cut ===
Interestingly, it works when declared outside the class itself, which makes me
suspect that this is caused
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 16:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=12446)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12446action=view)
Fix for this and PR29394
As well as fixing these PRs, this patch provides an option -finitialize-null,
which does
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 16:51 ---
This is going to be difficult to fix. In fact, it will require a
complete rewrite on how BOZ are handled.
Fortran 2003:
a = real(z'F')
= 2.1019477E-44
Are you sure this is the only correct value? The
--- Comment #6 from smithj at rpath dot com 2006-10-16 16:53 ---
if are are using 4.2: http://people.rpath.com/~smithj/gcc-java-nomulti.patch
if 4.1.1: http://tinyurl.com/y37csd
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 16:58 ---
Fixed on trunk. Testing for 4.1.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 17:01 ---
Actually all inlined functions for C++ are missing the diagnostic:
inline int fii(int *other)
{
if(!other)return 0;
}
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 17:02
---
Subject: Bug 28211
Author: mmitchel
Date: Mon Oct 16 17:02:07 2006
New Revision: 117787
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117787
Log:
PR c++/28211
* parser.c
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 17:02 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Interestingly, it works when declared outside the class itself, which makes me
suspect that this is caused by some C++ parser oddity.
Are you sure because I could reproduce the missing
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 17:04 ---
Actually for C++, any inline disables the warning:
inline int fii(int *other)
{
if(!other)return 0;
}
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 17:04 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21678 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 17:04 ---
*** Bug 29485 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
2006-10-16 17:12 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Fortran 2003:
a = real(z'F')
= 2.1019477E-44
Are you sure this is the only correct value? The F2003 says nothing
about the other 28 bits. It also says
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 17:17
---
Fixed in 4.2.0. Will not be fixed in previous releases.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 17:22 ---
Subject: Bug 29095
Author: bkoz
Date: Mon Oct 16 17:22:38 2006
New Revision: 117788
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117788
Log:
2006-10-16 Benjamin Kosnik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 17:23 ---
Forgot to add myself to cc listing.
Tobias, the only place the handling on a BOZ (other the data-stmt handling)
is discussed in the description REAL() intrinsic procedure. It contains
the dreaded processor-dependent
While moving the definition of a friend template out of the class definition I
found this error.
Please compile the attached file and have a look at the ReleaseAll function.
The file is part of Loki.
--
Summary: call of friend template is ambiguous
Product: gcc
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #1 from syntheticpp at gmx dot net 2006-10-16 17:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=12447)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12447action=view)
demo: g++ bug.cpp
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29486
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 18:36
---
The problem here is that tsubst, for a TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM, reduces the
parameter level for the new TEMPLATE_TEMPLATE_PARM (via a call to
reduce_template_parm_level), but does not reset
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 18:37 ---
Subject: Bug 29403
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Oct 16 18:37:39 2006
New Revision: 117789
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=117789
Log:
2006-10-15 Steven G. Kargl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PR
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 18:42 ---
Actually, even C generates one static var for all the inlined functions (in C
within one object), so I'd say we just should mark functions containing
local static variables with label in their initializers as
--- Comment #7 from dir at lanl dot gov 2006-10-16 18:53 ---
I tried installing the patch (the two patch files in comment #6 were identical)
into 4.2 , but it failed -
[dranta:~/gfortran/gcc/libjava] dir% patch -p2 gcc-java-nomulti.patch
patching file configure
Hunk #1 succeeded at
--- Comment #8 from smithj at rpath dot com 2006-10-16 18:55 ---
sorry about that. http://people.rpath.com/~smithj/gcc42-java-nomulti.patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
--- Comment #9 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 19:00 ---
You may want to try --disable-multilib.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 19:18 ---
Fixed on 4.1, now.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 19:21 ---
A regression hunt identified the following patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=116424
r116424 | amylaar | 2006-08-25 18:51:57 + (Fri, 25 Aug 2006)
--
janis at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #10 from dir at lanl dot gov 2006-10-16 19:57 ---
What does --disable-multilib do ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 20:00
---
(In reply to comment #10)
What does --disable-multilib do ?
It disables all the creation of the multi arch libraries so only the default
archeture is created for the libraries.
--
--- Comment #12 from smithj at rpath dot com 2006-10-16 20:03 ---
Be that as it may, there are plenty of cases where multilib is desired, just
not for java. That should be an option.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25026
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 20:07 ---
Quickly looking at the source, I think this is the same as PR 29438 and PR
29236.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 20:10
---
(In reply to comment #12)
Be that as it may, there are plenty of cases where multilib is desired, just
not for java. That should be an option.
Not really, if you don't have the libraries, you should not be
--- Comment #14 from smithj at rpath dot com 2006-10-16 20:13 ---
Java multilib is very difficult to bootstrap. For distros which require a clean
bootstrap, yet want multilib support, having it without java is an acceptable
compromise.
--
--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 20:14
---
(In reply to comment #14)
Java multilib is very difficult to bootstrap. For distros which require a
clean
bootstrap, yet want multilib support, having it without java is an acceptable
compromise.
Is it? You
--- Comment #16 from dir at lanl dot gov 2006-10-16 20:18 ---
The patch from comment #8 partly fails on a 4.2 tree created this afternoon -
[dranta:~/gfortran/gcc/libjava] dir% patch -p2 gcc42-java-nomulti.patch
patching file Makefile.in
Hunk #1 FAILED at 9006.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED
--- Comment #3 from syntheticpp at gmx dot net 2006-10-16 20:53 ---
Comeau compiles it, but vc8 also fails.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29486
--- Comment #4 from syntheticpp at gmx dot net 2006-10-16 20:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=12448)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12448action=view)
mingw-gcc crash
Here another file which does not compile.
On Windows gcc even crashs:
bug2.cpp: In function `void
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-10-16 21:00 ---
Subject: Bug number PR29451
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg00822.html
--
--- Comment #5 from syntheticpp at gmx dot net 2006-10-16 21:09 ---
bug2.cpp: 4.0.1 and 20061010 doesn't crash.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29486
--- Comment #6 from syntheticpp at gmx dot net 2006-10-16 21:18 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Quickly looking at the source, I think this is the same as PR 29438 and PR
29236.
Yes, this is possible, allways template templates are used as template
parameter.
--
--- Comment #14 from mathieu dot courtois at free dot fr 2006-10-16 21:28
---
Sorry for my silence...
I have the same error with source code of comment #12 always with :
gcc version 4.1.2 20060901 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-13)
I'm downloading svn snapshot...
--
--- Comment #2 from geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 21:46 ---
I think this is a dup of bug 23067; they have the same underlying problem,
which is that FSF GCC doesn't emulate the Apple GCC algorithm for structure
layout exactly.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of
--- Comment #25 from geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 21:46 ---
*** Bug 25630 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--
geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11377
--
geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15834
--
geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16622
--
geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23067
--- Comment #7 from geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 21:58 ---
This should work now for DWARF, so only stabs uses strange numbering.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3920
--- Comment #3 from eldenc at tucsonembedded dot com 2006-10-16 22:18
---
Compiling/Installation 4.1.1 is really easy, but answering the question 'Does
it compile my stuff?' prior to really installing for everybody is a little
difficult...
It would be nice if (when lean isn't set)
--- Comment #5 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 22:28 ---
Also fails on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 (32-bit).
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-16 22:29 ---
Sorry, only obj-c++.dg/bitfield-1.mm fails on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23610
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
