[Bug fortran/45715] [ABI cleanup] Move runtime parsing of I/O control list to front end

2010-09-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 06:54 --- (In reply to comment #1) Here is a case where we do have to evaluate at run time. So maybe we can not do what is proposed above. Well, I understood the request such that one passes a boolean for the 'YES' / 'NO'

[Bug debug/45673] -fcompare-debug failure with minor difference in dumps

2010-09-21 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 08:02 --- Mine -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug lto/45702] [4.6 Regression] New LTO test failures

2010-09-21 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-09-21 08:44 --- Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] New LTO test failures On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Comment #15 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 00:44 --- Similar errors on

[Bug bootstrap/45737] New: Bootstrap comparison failure

2010-09-21 Thread iek at c-w dot be
Hi, I'm building gcc 4.5.1 and I encounter the below error: Comparing stages 2 and 3 warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs Bootstrap comparison failure! gmp/mpn/sb_div_q.o differs mpfr/get_d.o differs make[2]: *** [compare] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/IEK2/gcc-4.5.1-build' This

[Bug middle-end/45738] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected var_decl, have debug_expr_decl in const_value_known_p, at varpool.c:375

2010-09-21 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
Between revisions 164405 (working) and 164451, compiling the following code on *-apple-darwin* gives an ICE: [macbook] f90/bug% cat pr32083_1_red.f90 PROGRAM TestInfinite integer(8) :: bit_pattern_NegInf_i8 = -4503599627370496_8 integer(8) :: i real(8):: r r =

[Bug bootstrap/45737] Bootstrap comparison failure

2010-09-21 Thread iek at c-w dot be
-- iek at c-w dot be changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45737

[Bug debug/45673] -fcompare-debug failure with minor difference in dumps

2010-09-21 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 08:53 --- Created an attachment (id=21854) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21854action=view) Patch that fixes the problem Here's the patch I'm testing. Turns out it's not enough to take only the second

[Bug bootstrap/45737] Bootstrap comparison failure

2010-09-21 Thread iek at c-w dot be
--- Comment #1 from iek at c-w dot be 2010-09-21 08:55 --- Forgot to mention: GMP 4.3.2 MPFR 3.0.0 MPC 0.8.2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45737

[Bug bootstrap/45737] Bootstrap comparison failure

2010-09-21 Thread iek at c-w dot be
--- Comment #2 from iek at c-w dot be 2010-09-21 09:10 --- And GNU make 3.80 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45737

[Bug tree-optimization/45656] [4.5 Regression]: gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 -O3, wrong code with -g

2010-09-21 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 09:19 --- Mine. It's something wrong in combine, causing the cmp insn to be deleted as trivially dead. -- aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-09-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 09:20 --- Any idea what could be done from the gfortran side? Without being able to reproduce it, it is a bit difficult to debug :-( -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169

[Bug fortran/45319] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla4.f90

2010-09-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 09:28 --- (In reply to comment #1) Similar fails: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla5.f90 -O0 (test for warnings, line 69) FAIL: libgomp.fortran/vla5.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) Excess errors:

[Bug fortran/45710] WRITE of NAMELIST group to internal file contains newline characters

2010-09-21 Thread urbanjost at comcast dot net
--- Comment #8 from urbanjost at comcast dot net 2010-09-21 09:34 --- Subject: Re: WRITE of NAMELIST group to internal file contains newline characters Per some discussions today, there were apparently different versions on some of the nodes I was using, ranging from 4.3.4 to 4.6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/45580] [4.6 Regression] Building WebKit fails with compiler catching SIGSEGV in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo()

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 09:52 --- Subject: Bug 45580 Author: rguenth Date: Tue Sep 21 09:52:00 2010 New Revision: 164474 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164474 Log: 2010-09-21 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de PR

[Bug tree-optimization/45580] [4.6 Regression] Building WebKit fails with compiler catching SIGSEGV in gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo()

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 09:53 --- ICE fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/42315] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE with invalid array initializer

2010-09-21 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
-- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|paolo dot carlini at oracle |unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dot com

[Bug tree-optimization/45656] [4.5 Regression]: gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 -O3, wrong code with -g

2010-09-21 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 10:04 --- Created an attachment (id=21855) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21855action=view) Patch that fixes the problem cse was losing track of cc0 set/use because of intervening debug insns. Anyone got

[Bug tree-optimization/45734] [4.6 Regression] Devirtualization results in wrong-code

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 10:12 --- The following is miscompiled since ever (and also ICC miscompiles it), so I'm not sure if it is valid to use 'f' to refer to the Bar object. namespace std { typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t; } inline void* operator

[Bug middle-end/45739] New: [missed optimization] static evaluation of SSE intrinsics (pxor)

2010-09-21 Thread kretz at kde dot org
Testcase: #include emmintrin.h __m128i foo; int main() { foo = _mm_xor_si128(_mm_setzero_si128(), foo); return 0; } Resulting Assembly (with -O3): pxor%xmm0, %xmm0 xorl%eax, %eax pxorfoo(%rip), %xmm0 movdqa %xmm0, foo(%rip) ret Expected Result: since any value xor zero does

[Bug target/35906] build fails when building with -m32 -mcpu=ultrasparc (sparcv9 or -mv8plus also)

2010-09-21 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 10:15 --- Target: sparc-linux-gnu Configured with: /home/ebotcazou/src-4.4/configure --build=sparc-linux-gnu --prefix=/home/ebotcazou/install-4.4 --enable-languages=c,ada --with-cpu=ultrasparc Thread model: posix gcc

[Bug target/45739] static evaluation of SSE intrinsics (pxor)

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 10:25 --- Confirmed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/45694] [MinGW64] fortran host associated variables+optimization==failure?

2010-09-21 Thread t66667 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from t7 at gmail dot com 2010-09-21 10:28 --- Hi, (In reply to comment #0) Hi, (i first reported this to mingw32-w64's bug tracker: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=3067541group_id=202880atid=983354 and was forwarded here) Kai has posted a patch

[Bug middle-end/45712] [4.6 Regression] Segmentation violation when compiling spec source on either x86 or ppc with debugging

2010-09-21 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 10:29 --- this should be fixed by patch introducing static_object_in_other_unit_p. However it seems bit strange that we can get into VAR_DECL not in a varpool by folding. I know this is possible for vtables and type infos,

[Bug middle-end/45738] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected var_decl, have debug_expr_decl in const_value_known_p, at varpool.c:375

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug lto/45736] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in cgraph_remove_unreachable_nodes, at ipa.c:245 with -flto and attribute((constructor))

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug tree-optimization/45704] [4.5 Regression] load byte instruction is used for volatile int

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 10:47 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/45704] [4.5 Regression] load byte instruction is used for volatile int

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 10:47 --- Subject: Bug 45704 Author: rguenth Date: Tue Sep 21 10:47:28 2010 New Revision: 164475 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164475 Log: 2010-09-21 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de PR

[Bug bootstrap/45445] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: comparison failures after stage 3

2010-09-21 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #19 from bernds at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 11:12 --- Can you provide a .i file for which this is reproducible with a cross compiler? Before/after -fdump-rtl-ira dumps and assembly files could also be helpful. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45445

[Bug target/45739] static evaluation of SSE intrinsics (pxor)

2010-09-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug bootstrap/45445] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: comparison failures after stage 3

2010-09-21 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Comment #20 from mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2010-09-21 11:30 --- (In reply to comment #19) Can you provide a .i file for which this is reproducible with a cross compiler? Before/after -fdump-rtl-ira dumps and assembly files could also be helpful. I'm leaving in a couple of

[Bug middle-end/45738] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected var_decl, have debug_expr_decl in const_value_known_p, at varpool.c:375

2010-09-21 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-21 12:23 --- It is caused by revision 164438: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00734.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/45739] static evaluation of SSE intrinsics (pxor)

2010-09-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 12:23 --- Created an attachment (id=21856) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21856action=view) gcc46-pr45739.patch Fix. For further optimizations (like vector A | ~0, A | ~A, A ^ ~0, A ~0), I guess we'd need

[Bug fortran/45740] New: PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-09-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
From Fortran 2008: C549 An entity with the PROTECTED attribute shall be a procedure pointer or variable. C551 A nonpointer object that has the PROTECTED attribute and is accessed by use association shall not appear in a variable definition context (16.6.7) or as the data-target or proc-target in

[Bug fortran/45290] [F08] pointer initialization

2010-09-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 12:37 --- Another issue besides comment 5 is the following program (from PR 45740), which gives an ICE. Actually, I am not quite sure the example is valid as p2's target is not known at compile time. module m

[Bug middle-end/45730] Undefined symbol __gnu_cxx::stdio_sync_filebufchar, std::char_traitschar ::xsgetn(char*, long)

2010-09-21 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:01 --- (In reply to comment #5) Thus, I would say middle-end? However, certainly doesn't happen on Linux, for some reason... Honza, in case please recategorize. This happens also on i686-darwin9 at m32 m64. However, it

[Bug java/44495] [4.6 regression] ICE in java_mangle_resource_name, at java/mangle.c:658

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44495

[Bug fortran/44945] [4.6 Regression] Wrong decl for module vars / FAIL: gfortran.dg/char_array_structure_constructor.f90

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44945

[Bug c/45054] [4.6 Regression] struct-by-value-1.c fail.

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45054

[Bug target/45250] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/01_assoc_laguerre/check_nan.cc

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:17 --- Hm, fixed? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45250

[Bug middle-end/45251] [4.6 Regression] Java testsuite regressions on hppa-linux

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45251

[Bug ada/45394] [4.6 regression] gnat fails to build on s390, trunk 20100814

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:24 --- Still broken? -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/45445] [4.6 regression] ARM bootstrap failure: comparison failures after stage 3

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45445

[Bug c/45491] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr45085.c

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:32 --- Probably another callee-copy thing. Needs investigation. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45491

[Bug middle-end/45550] [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1899

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:34 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/45562] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in cp_build_unary_op (typeck.c:5083) with -std=gnu++0x -fipa-cp-clone -fcompare-debug

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45562

[Bug tree-optimization/45563] [4.6 Regression] g++.dg/opt/devirt1.C ICEs in ipcp_init_cloned_node, at ipa-cp.c:190 with -fno-early-inlining -fipa-cp-clone

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45563

[Bug middle-end/45565] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in execute_todo, at passes.c:1276 with -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-inline -fipa-cp-clone -fkeep-inline-functions

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45565

[Bug tree-optimization/45734] [DR 1116] Devirtualization results in wrong-code

2010-09-21 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:37 --- Not a bug; all these testcases (should) have undefined behavior. I'm working on clarifying the standard to that end. This is related to http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_active.html#1116 and on the C

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-09-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:47 --- TODO: Check whether the code is really invalid - C551 talks only about nonpointers, but it also talks about proc-target - which only applies to procedures and the PROTECTED only applies per C549 to variables and

[Bug tree-optimization/45572] [4.6 Regression] various ICEs with -finline-small-functions -findirect-inlining -finline-functions

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45572

[Bug fortran/45290] [F08] pointer initialization

2010-09-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:52 --- (In reply to comment #9) procedure(), pointer :: ptr3 = p2 I now believe that this is invalid (all quotes are F2008): R505 initialization is [...] or = initial-data-target R443 initial-data-target is

[Bug tree-optimization/45626] [4.6 Regression] Segfault in fold_const_aggregate_ref

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 13:56 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/45653] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in cgraph_decide_inlining_of_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1241 with -fno-early-inlining -fno-ipa-cp -fno-ipa-pure-const

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 14:00 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/45687] [4.6 Regression] possible wrong code bug

2010-09-21 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45687

[Bug c++/45645] pr44972.C fails with error: �__assert_fail� was not declared in this scope

2010-09-21 Thread iains at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from iains at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 14:13 --- Subject: Bug 45645 Author: iains Date: Tue Sep 21 14:12:58 2010 New Revision: 164479 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164479 Log: 2010-09-21 Jonathan Wakely r...@gcc.gnu.org Jack

[Bug rtl-optimization/45678] [4.4/4.5 Regression] crash on vector code with -m32 -msse

2010-09-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #29 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 14:19 --- Subject: Bug 45678 Author: jakub Date: Tue Sep 21 14:18:34 2010 New Revision: 164480 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164480 Log: PR middle-end/45678 * expr.c (expand_expr_real_1)

[Bug fortran/45740] PROCEDURE POINTER and PROTECTED: Accepts/ICEs on invalid code

2010-09-21 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 14:19 --- (In reply to comment #1) TODO: Check whether the code is really invalid I have now asked at J3, cf. http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2010-September/thread.html --

[Bug libgcj/40182] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] regressions in libjava testsuite on sparc-linux

2010-09-21 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 14:39 --- Fixed on the 4.4 branch: LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: branches/gcc-4_4-branch revision 164288 Native configuration is sparc-unknown-linux-gnu === libjava tests === Running target unix

[Bug lto/45727] ICE: in subreg_get_info, at rtlanal.c:3092

2010-09-21 Thread ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 14:40 --- Which architecture/cpu are you wanting to build for? I'm not sure what the default is. If you can specify that when you configure, and then post the outcome of the build, that would be helpful. -- ibolton at

[Bug tree-optimization/45563] [4.6 Regression] g++.dg/opt/devirt1.C ICEs in ipcp_init_cloned_node, at ipa-cp.c:190 with -fno-early-inlining -fipa-cp-clone

2010-09-21 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-21 14:46 --- It is caused by revision 162911: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-08/msg00122.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/45562] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in cp_build_unary_op (typeck.c:5083) with -std=gnu++0x -fipa-cp-clone -fcompare-debug

2010-09-21 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-21 14:54 --- It is caused by revision 162911: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-08/msg00122.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/45394] [4.6 regression] gnat fails to build on s390, trunk 20100918

2010-09-21 Thread doko at ubuntu dot com
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2010-09-21 14:59 --- https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=gcc-snapshot yes, 20100918 still fails to build: -- doko at ubuntu dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug ada/45394] [4.6 regression] gnat fails to build on s390, trunk 20100918

2010-09-21 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 15:09 --- Investigating. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/45656] [4.5 Regression]: gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 -O3, wrong code with -g

2010-09-21 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 15:11 --- (In reply to comment #5) Created an attachment (id=21855) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21855action=view) [edit] Patch that fixes the problem cse was losing track of cc0 set/use because of

[Bug target/45250] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/01_assoc_laguerre/check_nan.cc

2010-09-21 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #11 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2010-09-21 15:16 --- Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] FAIL: tr1/5_numerical_facilities/special_functions/01_assoc_laguerre/check_nan.cc Hm, fixed? It's fixed on the target. I left it open because I wasn't sure whether the

[Bug tree-optimization/45656] [4.5 Regression]: gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 -O3, wrong code with -g

2010-09-21 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 15:17 --- Created an attachment (id=21857) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21857action=view) Same patch, just s/0/NULL_RTX/ in two places. As mentioned plus one more place. -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug lto/45727] ICE: in subreg_get_info, at rtlanal.c:3092

2010-09-21 Thread rafael dot carre at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from rafael dot carre at gmail dot com 2010-09-21 15:20 --- Same output with -mcpu=arm926ej-s or -mcpu=arm7tdmi What did you mean with when I configure ? I posted gcc -v output, should I rebuild gcc with a specific option? I build with

[Bug lto/45729] -flto conflicts with -mthumb

2010-09-21 Thread ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from ibolton at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 15:30 --- Unfortunately, LTO does not officially work on ARM yet. There are many LTO failures in the gcc testsuite at the moment. Can you retry without LTO so we can diagnose the interworking problems? -- ibolton at gcc

[Bug rtl-optimization/45678] [4.4/4.5 Regression] crash on vector code with -m32 -msse

2010-09-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #30 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 16:30 --- Subject: Bug 45678 Author: jakub Date: Tue Sep 21 16:30:21 2010 New Revision: 164486 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164486 Log: PR middle-end/45678 * expr.c (expand_expr_real_1)

[Bug tree-optimization/45656] [4.5 Regression]: gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 -O3, wrong code with -g

2010-09-21 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 16:34 --- Created an attachment (id=21858) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21858action=view) Same patch, just gunzipped this time. :) -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/45678] [4.4/4.5 Regression] crash on vector code with -m32 -msse

2010-09-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #31 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 16:42 --- Fixed. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

the arm

2010-09-21 Thread Burdine Racitano
I misunderstood you. I thought you said 'anybody,' and so I supposed 'anybody' included--well, anybody; that is, everybody. It doth--anybody that is of lofty birth; and the better if he be royal. That, it meseemeth, might well be, said the abbot, who saw his opportunity to smooth things and avert

[Bug c++/45562] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in cp_build_unary_op (typeck.c:5083) with -std=gnu++0x -fipa-cp-clone -fcompare-debug

2010-09-21 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 17:08 --- This is the full backtrace: #0 0x081e945d in cp_build_unary_op (code=ADDR_EXPR, xarg=0xb76d0dac, noconvert=0, complain=3) at /home/mjambor/gcc/icln/gcc/cp/typeck.c:5091 #1 0x080d10b3 in build_this

[Bug c/45741] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in string_constant (expr.c:9863) when parsing memcmp()

2010-09-21 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
Command line: $ gcc testcase.c $ cat testcase.c static const int data[2048]; void foo (void *ptr) { __builtin_memcmp (data, ptr, 1); } Relevant valgrind output: $ valgrind --trace-children=yes /mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-164484-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/bin/gcc testcase.c ==13187==

[Bug tree-optimization/45572] [4.6 Regression] various ICEs with -finline-small-functions -findirect-inlining -finline-functions

2010-09-21 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 17:14 --- *** Bug 45563 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45572

[Bug tree-optimization/45563] [4.6 Regression] g++.dg/opt/devirt1.C ICEs in ipcp_init_cloned_node, at ipa-cp.c:190 with -fno-early-inlining -fipa-cp-clone

2010-09-21 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 17:14 --- The same patch works for both bugs so I assume they are duplicates. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 45572 *** -- jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/45572] [4.6 Regression] various ICEs with -finline-small-functions -findirect-inlining -finline-functions

2010-09-21 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 17:19 --- Created an attachment (id=21859) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21859action=view) Proposed fix. I'm testing this fix. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45572

[Bug bootstrap/45737] Bootstrap comparison failure

2010-09-21 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal GCC target triplet|

[Bug c/45741] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in string_constant (expr.c:9863) when parsing memcmp()

2010-09-21 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2010-09-21 17:37 --- It is caused by revision 164438: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00734.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/41975] [C++0x] [DR579] unordered_set::erase performs worse when nearly empty

2010-09-21 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #30 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-09-21 17:55 --- More correctly (in the meanwhile went through a exchange at the beginning of this year), Howard stores the hash, which boils down to a memory requirement similar to that of the traditional doubly linked list

[Bug target/45694] [MinGW64] fortran host associated variables+optimization==failure?

2010-09-21 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 17:58 --- Subject: Bug 45694 Author: ktietz Date: Tue Sep 21 17:58:32 2010 New Revision: 164489 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164489 Log: 2010-09-21 Kai Tietz kai.ti...@onevision.com PR

[Bug objc/25965] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Allows duplicate member names in objc subclasses

2010-09-21 Thread nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 18:51 --- Subject: Bug 25965 Author: nicola Date: Tue Sep 21 18:51:34 2010 New Revision: 164491 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164491 Log: PR objc/25965 In gcc/objc/: * objc-act.c

[Bug objc/25965] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Allows duplicate member names in objc subclasses

2010-09-21 Thread nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 18:52 --- Patch applied to trunk. Thanks -- nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/45648] [4.6 regression] Unnecessary temporary for transpose calls as actual argument.

2010-09-21 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 19:04 --- Subject: Bug 45648 Author: mikael Date: Tue Sep 21 19:04:09 2010 New Revision: 164494 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164494 Log: 2010-09-21 Mikael Morin mik...@gcc.gnu.org PR

[Bug target/45694] [MinGW64] fortran host associated variables+optimization==failure?

2010-09-21 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 19:05 --- Subject: Bug 45694 Author: ktietz Date: Tue Sep 21 19:05:18 2010 New Revision: 164495 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164495 Log: 2010-09-21 Kai Tietz kai.ti...@onevision.com PR

[Bug target/45694] [MinGW64] fortran host associated variables+optimization==failure?

2010-09-21 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 19:09 --- Issue fixed on mainline and backported to 4.5 branch -- ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug lto/45702] [4.6 Regression] New LTO test failures

2010-09-21 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #17 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2010-09-21 20:40 --- Subject: Re: [4.6 Regression] New LTO test failures Similar errors on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11. Excess errors are: cc1: error: LTO support has not been enabled in this configuration cc1: error:

[Bug objc/23710] objc front-end should not abort after erroring out about method definition not in class context

2010-09-21 Thread nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 20:47 --- Subject: Bug 23710 Author: nicola Date: Tue Sep 21 20:47:04 2010 New Revision: 164497 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164497 Log: PR objc/23710 In gcc/: * c-family/c-common.h

[Bug objc/23710] objc front-end should not abort after erroring out about method definition not in class context

2010-09-21 Thread nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 20:48 --- Fix committed to trunk. Thanks -- nicola at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug web/43133] changes.html needs to document configure API changes due to autotools upgrade

2010-09-21 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 20:52 --- The changes.html patch went in a while ago; I'm leaving open PR 43132 for remaining issues but closing this one. -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug other/44253] libdecnumber .o vs. obj = @OBJEXT@

2010-09-21 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 20:56 --- trunk is fixed by r163993, http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-09/msg00285.html -- rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug driver/44933] --help=common undocumented

2010-09-21 Thread rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 20:58 --- Please send patches to the gcc-patches list, in the usual format and with all information attached as per http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html. You might want to consider wrapping lines so neither source file nor

[Bug fortran/45742] New: VOLATILE not honored in comparison

2010-09-21 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
i...@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Compare cat op.f90 program main integer, volatile :: j if (jj) call notfound end program main i...@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Compare gfortran op.f90 i...@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Compare The call to notfound should not be elided. -- Summary: VOLATILE not honored

[Bug rtl-optimization/41085] [4.5/4.6 Regression]: cris-elf gcc.dg/pr28796-2.c

2010-09-21 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 21:26 --- Subject: Bug 41085 Author: hp Date: Tue Sep 21 21:25:57 2010 New Revision: 164498 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164498 Log: PR rtl-optimization/41085 Backport from mainline

[Bug rtl-optimization/45051] [4.6 Regression]: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/abs-2.c and abs-3.c due to track subwords of DImode allocnos

2010-09-21 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 21:26 --- Subject: Bug 45051 Author: hp Date: Tue Sep 21 21:25:57 2010 New Revision: 164498 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164498 Log: PR rtl-optimization/41085 Backport from mainline

[Bug rtl-optimization/41085] [4.5/4.6 Regression]: cris-elf gcc.dg/pr28796-2.c

2010-09-21 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 21:30 --- . -- hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/45656] [4.5 Regression]: gfortran.dg/forall_4.f90 -O3, wrong code with -g

2010-09-21 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 21:44 --- (In reply to comment #8) Created an attachment (id=21858) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21858action=view) [edit] It fixes the bug with no regressions for r164480. Thanks! --

[Bug java/44095] [4.5/4.6 Regression] massive java failures due to -findirect-dispatch breakage on sparc64-linux

2010-09-21 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 21:45 --- Java is severely broken on sparc64-linux with gcc 4.5/4.6, which is a major regression from 4.4: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2010-05/msg00853.html (4.6 broken)

[Bug tree-optimization/45743] New: [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/whole_file_3.f90 ICE: verify_stmts failed: invalid conversion in gimple call with -finline-small-functions

2010-09-21 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
The ICE message is similiar to PR45076 and PR45733, but this might be different problem. Compiler output: $ gfortran -O -finline-small-functions whole_file_3.f90 whole_file_3.f90:17.71: call PHLOAD (R, 1) ! { dg-error Missing alternate return spec }

[Bug rtl-optimization/45739] static evaluation of SSE intrinsics (pxor)

2010-09-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 23:33 --- Subject: Bug 45739 Author: jakub Date: Tue Sep 21 23:33:01 2010 New Revision: 164501 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=164501 Log: PR rtl-optimization/45739 * simplify-rtx.c

  1   2   >