[Bug target/45980] Use not in stead of add to generate new constant

2010-10-18 Thread carrot at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45980 --- Comment #1 from Carrot carrot at google dot com 2010-10-18 06:24:04 UTC --- The replacement of constant loading with add operations is occurred at pass postreload in function reload_cse_move2add. It is straight forward to extend that to other

[Bug fortran/46060] gfortran crash when referencing procedure pointer

2010-10-18 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46060 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc

[Bug objc/18255] [GNU runtime] Protocols are not initialized correctly

2010-10-18 Thread tilo at pruetz dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18255 --- Comment #13 from Tilo Prütz tilo at pruetz dot net 2010-10-18 08:21:31 UTC --- Thank you very much!

[Bug middle-end/46019] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] x / (0x200000000ULL y) miscompilation with 32-bit HWI

2010-10-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46019 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 08:26:09 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 18 08:26:06 2010 New Revision: 165610 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165610 Log: PR middle-end/46019

[Bug gcov-profile/39669] gcov --preserve-paths causes mangled filenames on windows

2010-10-18 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39669 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last

[Bug other/43448] gccbug should be removed

2010-10-18 Thread ak at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43448 --- Comment #1 from ak at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 09:39:19 UTC --- Author: ak Date: Mon Oct 18 09:39:15 2010 New Revision: 165613 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165613 Log: Remove gccbug gcc/ 2010-10-18 Andi Kleen

[Bug fortran/46060] gfortran crash when referencing procedure pointer

2010-10-18 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46060 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug bootstrap/46055] [4.6 Regression] -fwhopr failed configure test

2010-10-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/46019] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] x / (0x200000000ULL y) miscompilation with 32-bit HWI

2010-10-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46019 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 09:57:05 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 18 09:57:02 2010 New Revision: 165617 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165617 Log: PR middle-end/46019

[Bug bootstrap/46055] [4.6 Regression] -fwhopr failed configure test

2010-10-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 09:58:41 UTC --- Hmm, does -fuse-linker-plugin have the same side-effects as -fwhole-program? That will break symbol use by dlopened objects and we have to avoid that.

[Bug middle-end/46019] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] x / (0x200000000ULL y) miscompilation with 32-bit HWI

2010-10-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46019 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 10:08:52 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 18 10:08:47 2010 New Revision: 165621 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165621 Log: PR middle-end/46019

[Bug lto/44950] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:22271

2010-10-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44950 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 10:54:21 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Oct 18 10:54:18 2010 New Revision: 165629 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165629 Log: 2010-10-18 Richard

[Bug lto/44950] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:22271

2010-10-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44950 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/45472] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2

2010-10-18 Thread abel at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472 --- Comment #6 from Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 10:57:23 UTC --- Anybody familiar with the expand/tree level can take a look on this? I can spare some time later this week if folks are busy.

[Bug middle-end/46019] [4.3 Regression] x / (0x200000000ULL y) miscompilation with 32-bit HWI

2010-10-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46019 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc

[Bug c/45834] Redundant inter-loop edges in DDG

2010-10-18 Thread bmei at broadcom dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834 Bingfeng Mei bmei at broadcom dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richard.guenther

[Bug c/45834] Redundant inter-loop edges in DDG

2010-10-18 Thread richard.guenther at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834 --- Comment #2 from richard.guenther at gmail dot com richard.guenther at gmail dot com 2010-10-18 11:38:03 UTC --- On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:33 PM, bmei at broadcom dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:

[Bug fortran/46060] [F03] procedure pointer component referenced without argument list

2010-10-18 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46060 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gfortran crash when |[F03] procedure pointer

[Bug rtl-optimization/45472] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2

2010-10-18 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472 Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug c++/46061] [C++0x] Variadic Template Templates: not expandable into fixed-size argument list, Implementation Gap.

2010-10-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46061 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/39653] [C++0x] error referencing a more specialized variadic template from primary

2010-10-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39653 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andreas.milton.m

[Bug web/46064] New: have to enter a comment to resolve a bug as a duplicate

2010-10-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46064 Summary: have to enter a comment to resolve a bug as a duplicate Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/45834] Redundant inter-loop edges in DDG

2010-10-18 Thread bmei at broadcom dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834 --- Comment #3 from Bingfeng Mei bmei at broadcom dot com 2010-10-18 12:16:59 UTC --- I think that standard specifies that char * may refer to an alias of any object, that's why QImode is different here. But I am not sure whether a restrict

[Bug rtl-optimization/45472] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2

2010-10-18 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472 --- Comment #8 from Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org 2010-10-18 12:20:39 UTC --- Would it make sense to make the statement volatile even if only some subcomponents (or all subcomponents) are volatile? I like (2); if I understand it

[Bug bootstrap/46055] [4.6 Regression] -fwhopr failed configure test

2010-10-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2010-10-18 12:23:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Hmm, does -fuse-linker-plugin have the same side-effects as -fwhole-program? That will break symbol use by dlopened objects and we have

[Bug c++/46065] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in poplevel_named_label_1, at cp/decl.c:477

2010-10-18 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46065 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in poplevel_named_label_1, at cp/decl.c:477 Product: gcc

[Bug c/45834] Redundant inter-loop edges in DDG

2010-10-18 Thread richard.guenther at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834 --- Comment #4 from richard.guenther at gmail dot com richard.guenther at gmail dot com 2010-10-18 13:42:33 UTC --- On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:17 PM, bmei at broadcom dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:

[Bug c/45834] Redundant inter-loop edges in DDG

2010-10-18 Thread bmei at broadcom dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834 --- Comment #5 from Bingfeng Mei bmei at broadcom dot com 2010-10-18 13:53:37 UTC --- Sure, but we have other means of dealing with that (MEM_ALIAS_SET == 0). Do you mean this check is redundant here ? I dig out the ancient code (from 1997)

[Bug lto/42987] Testcases local1-a.cc and local1.C cause ICE when compiled with -flto -g

2010-10-18 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42987 Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at seznam

[Bug c/45834] Redundant inter-loop edges in DDG

2010-10-18 Thread richard.guenther at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45834 --- Comment #6 from richard.guenther at gmail dot com richard.guenther at gmail dot com 2010-10-18 13:57:19 UTC --- On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:53 PM, bmei at broadcom dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:

[Bug tree-optimization/46066] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in create_parallel_loop, at tree-parloops.c:1455 with -ftree-parallelize-loops -g

2010-10-18 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46066 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in create_parallel_loop, at tree-parloops.c:1455 with -ftree-parallelize-loops -g Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/46067] New: hang or spurious compiler message using procedure pointer with pass

2010-10-18 Thread sjbespa at comcast dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067 Summary: hang or spurious compiler message using procedure pointer with pass Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/46068] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in consider_split, at ipa-split.c:313 with -flto/-fwhopr and asm goto

2010-10-18 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46068 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: in consider_split, at ipa-split.c:313 with -flto/-fwhopr and asm goto Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/46018] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10

2010-10-18 Thread ahaas at airmail dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018 --- Comment #7 from Art Haas ahaas at airmail dot net 2010-10-18 15:03:56 UTC --- My bootstrap build succeeded for the this morning again, so I suggest closing this ticket.

[Bug bootstrap/46055] [4.6 Regression] -fwhopr failed configure test

2010-10-18 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055 --- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2010-10-18 15:11:52 UTC --- Hi, I found what is causing the problem. I accidentally comitted also the following cleanup of visibility code. The difference is that we now trust linker's

[Bug c/46041] __FP_FAST_FMA not defined with -E

2010-10-18 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/45638] No rule to make target `check-lto', needed by `check'. Stop.

2010-10-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45638 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 15:16:11 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 18 15:16:07 2010 New Revision: 165638 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165638 Log: PR lto/45638 *

[Bug c/46041] __FP_FAST_FMA not defined with -E

2010-10-18 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2010-10-18 15:11:54 |

[Bug rtl-optimization/45967] [4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc-4.5.x optimizes code with side-effects away

2010-10-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45967 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 15:32:03 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Oct 18 15:32:00 2010 New Revision: 165641 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165641 Log: 2010-10-18 Richard

[Bug rtl-optimization/45967] [4.5 Regression] gcc-4.5.x optimizes code with side-effects away

2010-10-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45967 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||alias,

[Bug bootstrap/46018] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10

2010-10-18 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018 --- Comment #8 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-10-18 15:37:04 UTC --- On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, ahaas at airmail dot net wrote: Running 'git bisect' but interpreting a failed build as 'good' and a successful

[Bug c++/46065] [4.6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in poplevel_named_label_1, at cp/decl.c:477

2010-10-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46065 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/46066] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in create_parallel_loop, at tree-parloops.c:1455 with -ftree-parallelize-loops -g

2010-10-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46066 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/46068] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in consider_split, at ipa-split.c:313 with -flto/-fwhopr and asm goto

2010-10-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46068 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/45472] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2

2010-10-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 15:42:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Would it make sense to make the statement volatile even if only some subcomponents (or all subcomponents) are volatile? I

[Bug c++/45983] [4.5 Regression] ICE: tree code 'template_parm_index' is not supported in gimple streams with -lto

2010-10-18 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45983 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: |[4.5

[Bug bootstrap/46055] [4.6 Regression] -fwhopr failed configure test

2010-10-18 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46055 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2010-10-18 15:47:24 UTC --- Hi, the plugin seems to give bit funny resolutions in side cases, so I will revert the accident commit now, will commit the cleanup part of change incrementally

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-10-18 Thread sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 --- Comment #17 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2010-10-18 15:51:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) Based on my posted test results for hppa2.0-hp-hpux11.11, this PR was fixed on the trunk between r163182 and r163254. Need to find

[Bug web/45785] Bugzilla search sometimes fails with an internal error

2010-10-18 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45785 --- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2010-10-18 15:54:45 UTC ---

[Bug c/46015] [4.6 Regression] -Wunused-but-set-variable warns for arrays used in gotos

2010-10-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46015 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 15:55:31 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Oct 18 15:55:25 2010 New Revision: 165643 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165643 Log: PR c/46015 *

[Bug web/46064] have to enter a comment to resolve a bug as a duplicate

2010-10-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46064 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 15:56:11 UTC --- I think this is the right thing to do. when bugs are marked as dups the majority of the time, we want an explication. Because if there was none; the

[Bug rtl-optimization/45472] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2

2010-10-18 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472 --- Comment #10 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 15:58:26 UTC --- One idea we had was that this is all frontends business anyway, and hence it should (if it so desires) simply create volatile MEM_REFs for references to

[Bug web/46064] have to enter a comment to resolve a bug as a duplicate

2010-10-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46064 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/46041] __FP_FAST_FMA not defined with -E

2010-10-18 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041 --- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 16:12:21 UTC --- Does anyone honestly expect a pre-processor macro to change due to attributes on a function? I sure don't -- that would seem to be a clear translation phase

[Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2010-10-18 Thread tg at mirbsd dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804 Thorsten Glaser tg at mirbsd dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tg at mirbsd dot

[Bug c/46015] [4.6 Regression] -Wunused-but-set-variable warns for arrays used in gotos

2010-10-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46015 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/46041] __FP_FAST_FMA not defined with -E

2010-10-18 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041 --- Comment #7 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 16:21:31 UTC --- Yes, though the issue originally came up in terms of the pragma and not the attribute, because people wanted to include the various include files that

[Bug libstdc++/45866] [C++0x] std::ratio_add, ratio_sub, ratio_multiply, ratio_divide do not have num and den members.

2010-10-18 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45866 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2010-10-18 16:35:45 UTC --- I don't see c++/45114 resolved very soon, thus, for 4.6.0, let's provide anyway those constants, seems simple.

[Bug libstdc++/45866] [C++0x] std::ratio_add, ratio_sub, ratio_multiply, ratio_divide do not have num and den members.

2010-10-18 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45866 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/45472] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2

2010-10-18 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472 --- Comment #11 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-10-18 16:41:03 UTC --- On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Also consider memcpy (vv1, vv2) and eventually the compiler optimizing that

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-10-18 Thread sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 --- Comment #18 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2010-10-18 16:55:32 UTC --- It looks like this was fixed (for hppa at least) in r163190. 2010-08-12 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de PR tree-optimization/45232 *

[Bug tree-optimization/44776] FAIL: gcc.dg/matrix/transpose-3.c execution, -fprofile-use -fipa-matrix-reorg -fdump-ipa-matrix-reorg -O3 -fwhole-program

2010-10-18 Thread davek at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44776 Dave Korn davek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davek at gcc dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/45472] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6124 with -fselective-scheduling2

2010-10-18 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472 --- Comment #12 from Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org 2010-10-18 17:12:59 UTC --- It would be nice if for struct a { char a,b,c,d; volatile int e; }; struct a v1, v2; ... v1 = v2; the compiler emitted

[Bug bootstrap/44970] [4.6 regression] Revision 162270 failed to bootstrap

2010-10-18 Thread bonzini at gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970 Paolo Bonzini bonzini at gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #21699|0 |1 is

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-10-18 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 --- Comment #19 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-10-18 17:27:04 UTC --- It looks like this was fixed (for hppa at least) in r163190. 2010-08-12 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de PR tree-optimization/45232 *

[Bug libstdc++/45866] [C++0x] std::ratio_add, ratio_sub, ratio_multiply, ratio_divide do not have num and den members.

2010-10-18 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45866 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 17:28:21 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Oct 18 17:28:15 2010 New Revision: 165649 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165649 Log: 2010-10-18 Paolo

[Bug libstdc++/45866] [C++0x] std::ratio_add, ratio_sub, ratio_multiply, ratio_divide do not have num and den members.

2010-10-18 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45866 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/46067] hang or spurious compiler message using procedure pointer with pass

2010-10-18 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/42169] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr41928.f90:47: internal compiler error: in store_can_be_removed_p, at ira-emit.c:371

2010-10-18 Thread sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42169 --- Comment #20 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2010-10-18 17:54:42 UTC --- Not really, there are about 300 lines of new code (mostly in a new routine). It might be that only the change in can_reassociate_p is needed to fix this bug. That

[Bug c++/46071] New: ill-formed use of decltype and auto (c++0x) causes segfault

2010-10-18 Thread enniobarbaro at alice dot it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46071 Summary: ill-formed use of decltype and auto (c++0x) causes segfault Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/46071] [C++0x] ill-formed use of decltype and auto causes segfault

2010-10-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46071 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug target/46040] crtstuff.c:308:26: error: '__DTOR_LIST__' undeclared

2010-10-18 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46040 --- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2010-10-18 18:28:07 UTC --- On Fri, 15 Oct 2010, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46040 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/46068] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in consider_split, at ipa-split.c:313 with asm goto and __builtin_unreachable ()

2010-10-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46068 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|lto |

[Bug debug/46072] New: AIX linker chokes on debug info for uninitialized static variables

2010-10-18 Thread skunk at iskunk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072 Summary: AIX linker chokes on debug info for uninitialized static variables Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/46068] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in consider_split, at ipa-split.c:313 with asm goto and __builtin_unreachable ()

2010-10-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46068 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc

[Bug c/46073] New: __builtin_choose_expr outputs warnings for unused expression

2010-10-18 Thread kevin.waugh at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46073 Summary: __builtin_choose_expr outputs warnings for unused expression Product: gcc Version: 4.0.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3

[Bug c/46073] __builtin_choose_expr outputs warnings for unused expression

2010-10-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46073 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 19:00:51 UTC --- I think this is correct as __builtin_choose_expr still does semantically checking on the two arguments. Not to mention __builtin_choose_expr was added

[Bug libstdc++/45999] runtime error in std::vector python pretty printer.

2010-10-18 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/46073] __builtin_choose_expr outputs warnings for unused expression

2010-10-18 Thread kevin.waugh at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46073 --- Comment #2 from kevin.waugh at gmail dot com 2010-10-18 19:17:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) I think this is correct as __builtin_choose_expr still does semantically checking on the two arguments. Not to mention __builtin_choose_expr

[Bug bootstrap/44970] [4.6 regression] Revision 162270 failed to bootstrap

2010-10-18 Thread sje at cup dot hp.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44970 --- Comment #86 from Steve Ellcey sje at cup dot hp.com 2010-10-18 19:52:39 UTC --- I was able to bootstrap the 32 bit PA compiler using the latest patch. I haven't done a full test run yet but I will do that overnight.

[Bug c/46073] __builtin_choose_expr outputs warnings for unused expression

2010-10-18 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46073 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-10-18 19:55:25 UTC --- On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: checking on the two arguments. Not to mention __builtin_choose_expr was

[Bug c/46041] __FP_FAST_FMA not defined with -E

2010-10-18 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46041 --- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 20:01:24 UTC --- Created attachment 22083 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22083 Patch that redefines mode_has_fma so that it works with -save-temps

[Bug fortran/46067] [F03] invalid procedure pointer assignment not detected

2010-10-18 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug c++/46075] New: g++ wrongly lookups builtin types in ADL (compiles wrong code)

2010-10-18 Thread slyfox at inbox dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46075 Summary: g++ wrongly lookups builtin types in ADL (compiles wrong code) Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/46075] g++ wrongly lookups builtin types in ADL (compiles wrong code)

2010-10-18 Thread slyfox at inbox dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46075 --- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich slyfox at inbox dot ru 2010-10-18 20:23:10 UTC --- Created attachment 22084 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22084 test example. compilation should fail

[Bug c++/46075] g++ wrongly lookups builtin types in ADL (compiles wrong code)

2010-10-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46075 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 20:24:25 UTC --- Actually there is an open question if clang or gcc is correct according to the C++ standards committee. There is a defect report about foundational types.

[Bug c++/46075] g++ wrongly lookups builtin types in ADL (compiles wrong code)

2010-10-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46075 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/29131] [DR 225] Bad name lookup for templates due to fundamental types namespace for ADL.

2010-10-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slyfox at inbox

[Bug c++/225] using declaration doesn't take into account member overloading

2010-10-18 Thread antony.king at st dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225 --- Comment #4 from Antony King antony.king at st dot com 2010-10-18 20:29:01 UTC --- I am out of the office until 25th October 2010 and am unable to respond to your email until then. If you have any enquiries concerning the ST40 Micro Toolset then

[Bug c++/46075] g++ wrongly lookups builtin types in ADL (compiles wrong code)

2010-10-18 Thread slyfox at inbox dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46075 --- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich slyfox at inbox dot ru 2010-10-18 20:43:24 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Actually there is an open question if clang or gcc is correct according to the C++ standards committee. There is a defect report

[Bug lto/45375] [meta-bug] Issues with building Mozilla with LTO

2010-10-18 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375 Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[meta-bug] Mozilla does not |[meta-bug] Issues

[Bug fortran/46060] [F03] procedure pointer component referenced without argument list

2010-10-18 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46060 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/46075] g++ wrongly lookups builtin types in ADL (compiles wrong code)

2010-10-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46075 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 20:49:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #2) You mean standard is buggy and gcc refuses to implement ill behaviour, right? Or behaviour is not

[Bug middle-end/46076] New: [4.6 regression] constant propogation and compile-time math no longer happening versus 4.4 and 4.5

2010-10-18 Thread matt at use dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 Summary: [4.6 regression] constant propogation and compile-time math no longer happening versus 4.4 and 4.5 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/46076] [4.6 regression] constant propogation and compile-time math no longer happening versus 4.4 and 4.5

2010-10-18 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 21:15:16 UTC --- This is a micro benchmark really; we would inline it as far as I can tell if we have other things going on.

[Bug bootstrap/46018] [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on i386-pc-solaris2.10

2010-10-18 Thread ahaas at airmail dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46018 --- Comment #9 from Art Haas ahaas at airmail dot net 2010-10-18 21:27:59 UTC --- Once the patch discussed in the following mail was applied: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg01538.html I can confirm that the bootstrap failure I've

[Bug fortran/46067] [F03] invalid procedure pointer assignment not detected

2010-10-18 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 21:29:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) potential problem 2: if the error message is correct and if the type of the passed-object dummy argument in the sample code is changed from a

[Bug fortran/46067] [F03] invalid procedure pointer assignment not detected

2010-10-18 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46067 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2010-10-18 21:31:54 UTC --- Beware the INVALID recursive IOs: they hang on darwin!-(see pr 30617).

[Bug middle-end/43760] [4.6 regression] New test failures

2010-10-18 Thread sje at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43760 --- Comment #8 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 21:34:51 UTC --- Author: sje Date: Mon Oct 18 21:34:46 2010 New Revision: 165664 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165664 Log: 2010-10-18 Steve Ellcey

[Bug target/36898] Insufficient qp-mutex declarations

2010-10-18 Thread sje at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36898 --- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey sje at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-10-18 21:34:51 UTC --- Author: sje Date: Mon Oct 18 21:34:46 2010 New Revision: 165664 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165664 Log: 2010-10-18 Steve Ellcey

  1   2   >