[Bug fortran/47775] Wrong code with allocatable function RESULT and GENERIC interfaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47775 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 08:57:13 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Feb 19 08:57:10 2011 New Revision: 170309 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170309 Log: 2011-02-19 Tobias Burnus

[Bug target/47814] New: [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on mingw32 by undefined reference to 'lexer_line'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47814 Summary: [4.6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on mingw32 by undefined reference to 'lexer_line' Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/47815] New: Tail call regression with GCC snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47815 Summary: Tail call regression with GCC snapshot Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug fortran/47805] [OOP] Overridding hidden (private) TPB is rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47805 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/47800] [4.6 Regression] i?86 peephole related ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47800 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 11:23:06 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Feb 19 11:23:02 2011 New Revision: 170311 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170311 Log: PR target/47800 *

[Bug tree-optimization/47815] Tail call regression with GCC snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47815 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/47800] [4.6 Regression] i?86 peephole related ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47800 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/47775] Wrong code with allocatable function RESULT and GENERIC interfaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47775 --- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 11:27:55 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Feb 19 11:27:52 2011 New Revision: 170312 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170312 Log: 2011-02-19 Tobias Burnus

[Bug fortran/47775] Wrong code with allocatable function RESULT and GENERIC interfaces

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47775 Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/44945] [4.6 Regression] Wrong decl for module vars / FAIL: gfortran.dg/char_array_structure_constructor.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44945 Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |pault at gcc dot

[Bug c++/47208] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: in decl_constant_var_p, at cp/decl2.c:3563 with missing #include initializer_list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47208 --- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz 2011-02-19 12:26:37 UTC --- *** Bug 47300 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/47300] [C++0x] ICE: in decl_constant_var_p, at cp/decl2.c:3564 when using incomplete type as constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47300 Zdenek Sojka zsojka at seznam dot cz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/44945] [4.6 Regression] Wrong decl for module vars / FAIL: gfortran.dg/char_array_structure_constructor.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44945 --- Comment #30 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-02-19 12:43:04 UTC --- The bus error reported in comment #21 has disappeared from my scope between revisions 167584 and 167726;-( I'll test the patch in comment #29 ASAP.

[Bug fortran/44945] [4.6 Regression] Wrong decl for module vars / FAIL: gfortran.dg/char_array_structure_constructor.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44945 --- Comment #31 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 13:08:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) A candidate fix for the PR Aha, you have taken the simple route of modifying trans-decl.c and not the whole module reading

[Bug tree-optimization/47815] Tail call regression with GCC snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47815 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 13:45:50 UTC --- Hm, or rather it also is because FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, EXIT_BLOCK_PTR-preds) { /* Only traverse the normal exits, i.e. those that end with

[Bug tree-optimization/47815] Tail call regression with GCC snapshot

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47815 --- Comment #3 from Adam Warner adam at consulting dot net.nz 2011-02-19 13:55:43 UTC --- OK I finally understand. Tail call optimisation also disappears when the noreturn attribute is added to the leaf functions when compiled with gcc-4.5. From

[Bug fortran/47805] [OOP] Overridding hidden (private) TPB is rejected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47805 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 13:57:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) One can get rid of this error message e.g. by ... (warning: not regtested) Side note: This patch does not cause any regressions in the test suite.

[Bug target/47364] [x32] internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3355

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47364 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-02-19 14:22:45 UTC --- *** Bug 47812 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/47812] [x32] __builtin_strlen is miscompiled at -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47812 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug objc/47813] Some ObjC tests failing on ia6-suse-linux-gnu

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47813 Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug middle-end/47364] [x32] internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3355

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47364 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 14:53:24 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Sat Feb 19 14:53:20 2011 New Revision: 170316 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170316 Log: Properly handle target

[Bug fortran/47348] wrong string length with array constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47348 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 15:03:30 UTC --- Author: pault Date: Sat Feb 19 15:03:27 2011 New Revision: 170317 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170317 Log: 2011-02-19 Paul Thomas

[Bug fortran/44945] [4.6 Regression] Wrong decl for module vars / FAIL: gfortran.dg/char_array_structure_constructor.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44945 --- Comment #32 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com 2011-02-19 15:07:03 UTC --- Dear Tobias, Aha, you have taken the simple route of modifying trans-decl.c and not the whole module reading apparatus

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 15:10:58 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Feb 19 15:10:55 2011 New Revision: 170318 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170318 Log: 2011-02-19 Jerry

[Bug web/47718] bugzilla: commit mails mentioning binutils PR wrongly linked to GCC bug

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47718 Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c/47816] New: GCC pedwarns about use of static inline functions from system headers in extern inline functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47816 Summary: GCC pedwarns about use of static inline functions from system headers in extern inline functions Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 --- Comment #18 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 15:21:10 UTC --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Feb 19 15:21:05 2011 New Revision: 170319 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170319 Log: 2011-02-19 Jerry

[Bug c/47816] GCC pedwarns about use of static inline functions from system headers in extern inline functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47816 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug c/47809] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7291

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47809 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/47816] GCC pedwarns about use of static inline functions from system headers in extern inline functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47816 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Lennox lennox at cs dot columbia.edu 2011-02-19 15:38:04 UTC --- Created attachment 23404 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23404 Preprocessed source for test case

[Bug libfortran/47567] Wrong output for small absolute values with F editing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567 Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/47806] Failure to build cross-combiner to powerpc-ibm-aix6.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47806 --- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 15:48:45 UTC --- sysroot, right. obviously I don't have AIX so that basically means I can't build a cross-compiler to it, IIUC. Close as IBTK (aka INVALID)?

[Bug fortran/47778] reading two arrays of structures from namelist fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47778 Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/45592] [F03] Valid structure constructor rejected for extended types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45592 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-02-19 16:30:56 UTC --- This pr seems to have been fixed at revision 170312, probably by revision 170291 (it looks like a duplicate of pr47789).

[Bug fortran/45592] [F03] Valid structure constructor rejected for extended types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45592 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/47802] [4.6 Regression] libgfortran/intrinsics/ctime.c:75:3: error: too few arguments to function 'ctime_r'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 --- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 16:57:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Is there no way to get a posix compliant ctime? Alternatively, we'll need autoconf magic to detect the extra arg. I know at one

[Bug libfortran/47802] [4.6 Regression] libgfortran/intrinsics/ctime.c:75:3: error: too few arguments to function 'ctime_r'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 17:23:08 UTC --- Also, we have another problem: libtool: compile: /xxx/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xgcc -B/xxx/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/ -

[Bug libfortran/47802] [4.6 Regression] libgfortran/intrinsics/ctime.c:75:3: error: too few arguments to function 'ctime_r'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802 --- Comment #5 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 17:30:27 UTC --- Yes, so HP-UX 11 seems to do the right thing by default. So the problem is HP-UX 10, which only provides the 3-arg form and not the standard one,

[Bug c/47809] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7291

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47809 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/40959] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] FreeBSD/ia64 build fails: No rule to make target `/usr/ports/lang/gcc43/work/build/ia64-portbld-freebsd8.0/libgcc/crtfastmath.o', needed by `T_TARGET'.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40959 Ralf Wildenhues rwild at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rwild at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/46723] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_initial_def_for_induction, at tree-vect-loop.c:2431

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46723 Matthias Klose doko at ubuntu dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||doko at ubuntu dot

[Bug debug/47647] BLOCKs are empty

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47647 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 19:50:40 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Sat Feb 19 19:50:36 2011 New Revision: 170321 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170321 Log: 2011-02-18 Richard

[Bug debug/47647] BLOCKs are empty

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47647 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/47817] New: incorrectly working code generated with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47817 Summary: incorrectly working code generated with -O3 Product: gcc Version: 4.4.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/47817] incorrectly working code generated with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47817 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Aksyonoff andrew.aksyonoff at gmail dot com 2011-02-19 20:51:23 UTC --- Created attachment 23407 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23407 the preprocessed .ii file built with -O3 -save-temps

[Bug c++/47817] incorrectly working code generated with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47817 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 20:56:45 UTC --- I think you have some violation of the C/C++ aliasing rules where you access an unsigned int via an unsigned long long which in turn causes undefined

[Bug c/47809] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7291

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47809 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 20:57:15 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Feb 19 20:57:12 2011 New Revision: 170323 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170323 Log: PR c/47809 *

[Bug debug/47620] [4.6 Regression] Profiledbootstrap failure on powerpc-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620 --- Comment #17 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 20:59:27 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Sat Feb 19 20:59:23 2011 New Revision: 170324 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170324 Log: PR debug/47620 PR

[Bug bootstrap/47630] [4.6 regression] ICE in queue_insn, at haifa-sched.c:1322 compiling 64-bit libjava/java/lang/natString.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47630 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 20:59:27 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Sat Feb 19 20:59:23 2011 New Revision: 170324 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170324 Log: PR debug/47620 PR

[Bug c++/47817] incorrectly working code generated with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47817 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/46620] 32-bit structures containing bitfields are not copied correctly on -O2 , x86 backend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46620 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 21:02:39 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Sat Feb 19 21:02:35 2011 New Revision: 170325 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170325 Log: PR

[Bug tree-optimization/46620] 32-bit structures containing bitfields are not copied correctly on -O2 , x86 backend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46620 --- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 21:15:09 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Sat Feb 19 21:15:01 2011 New Revision: 170328 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170328 Log: PR

[Bug tree-optimization/46620] 32-bit structures containing bitfields are not copied correctly on -O2 , x86 backend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46620 --- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 21:14:53 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Sat Feb 19 21:14:49 2011 New Revision: 170327 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170327 Log: PR

[Bug tree-optimization/46620] 32-bit structures containing bitfields are not copied correctly on -O2 , x86 backend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46620 Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug debug/47620] [4.6 Regression] Profiledbootstrap failure on powerpc-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620 Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/15774] Conflicting function decls not diagnosed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15774 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/46620] 32-bit structures containing bitfields are not copied correctly on -O2 , x86 backend

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46620 --- Comment #7 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 21:08:51 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Sat Feb 19 21:08:40 2011 New Revision: 170326 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170326 Log: PR

[Bug c/47809] [4.5 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:7291

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47809 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.0

[Bug c++/47817] incorrectly working code generated with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47817 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Aksyonoff andrew.aksyonoff at gmail dot com 2011-02-19 21:10:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) I think you have some violation of the C/C++ aliasing rules where you access an unsigned int via an unsigned long long

[Bug ada/47818] New: Pragma Assert is rejected with No_Implementation_Pragmas restriction.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47818 Summary: Pragma Assert is rejected with No_Implementation_Pragmas restriction. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/47817] incorrectly working code generated with -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47817 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 21:37:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) But given that reinterpret_cast does not, I would still suspect some tricky things happening inside gcc anyway.. No

[Bug debug/47819] New: [meta-bug] LTO debug information issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47819 Summary: [meta-bug] LTO debug information issues Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo:

[Bug debug/47819] [meta-bug] LTO debug information issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47819 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto

[Bug c++/47503] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:5876 with -fno-elide-constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47503 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-19 22:39:53 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sat Feb 19 22:39:50 2011 New Revision: 170330 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170330 Log: PR c++/47503 *

[Bug lto/47788] [4.6 Regression] New LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47788 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/47503] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: in adjust_temp_type, at cp/semantics.c:5876 with -fno-elide-constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47503 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/44118] ICE: in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:16657

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44118 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug bootstrap/47820] New: [4.6 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47820 Summary: [4.6 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/47820] [4.6 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47820 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot

[Bug debug/47624] FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43077-1.c -O1 line 42 c == 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47624 --- Comment #4 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-20 02:19:42 UTC --- Patch is at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg00981.html Deferred to 4.7.

[Bug c/47821] New: BUG: warning: left shift count = width of type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47821 Summary: BUG: warning: left shift count = width of type Product: gcc Version: 4.1.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo:

[Bug c/47821] BUG: warning: left shift count = width of type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47821 nfavaro at uwo dot ca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/47753] Invalid 32bit libstdc++.dll.a on mingw-w64 target

targets. Verified on: gcc version 4.6.0 20110219 gcc version 4.5.3 20110219 This bug not exist now.

[Bug target/47753] Invalid 32bit libstdc++.dll.a on mingw-w64 target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47753 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/44118] ICE: in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:16657

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44118 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot