[Bug c++/50303] [C++0x] Segfault with variadic template template parameters

2011-09-15 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50303 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus

[Bug c++/50400] New: compiler accepts invalid X::Impl::Impl::Impl::.....::foo

2011-09-15 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50400 Bug #: 50400 Summary: compiler accepts invalid X::Impl::Impl::Impl::.::foo Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50401] New: SIGSEGV in resolve_transfer

2011-09-15 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50401 Bug #: 50401 Summary: SIGSEGV in resolve_transfer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/50402] New: ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor

2011-09-15 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50402 Bug #: 50402 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/50403] New: SIGSEGV in gfc_use_derived

2011-09-15 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50403 Bug #: 50403 Summary: SIGSEGV in gfc_use_derived Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/50404] New: SIGSEGV in gfc_resolve_close

2011-09-15 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50404 Bug #: 50404 Summary: SIGSEGV in gfc_resolve_close Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/50405] New: allocation LOOP or SIGSEGV

2011-09-15 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50405 Bug #: 50405 Summary: allocation LOOP or SIGSEGV Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/50406] New: ld undefined reference to __MOD_str

2011-09-15 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50406 Bug #: 50406 Summary: ld undefined reference to __MOD_str Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/46072] AIX linker chokes on debug info for uninitialized static variables

2011-09-15 Thread vovata at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072 vladimir penev vovata at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vovata at gmail

[Bug fortran/50407] New: compiler confused by .operator.

2011-09-15 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50407 Bug #: 50407 Summary: compiler confused by .operator. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/50408] New: ICE in transfer_expr

2011-09-15 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50408 Bug #: 50408 Summary: ICE in transfer_expr Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/50409] New: SIGSEGV in gfc_simplify_expr

2011-09-15 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50409 Bug #: 50409 Summary: SIGSEGV in gfc_simplify_expr Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/50410] New: ICE in record_reference

2011-09-15 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410 Bug #: 50410 Summary: ICE in record_reference Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/50411] New: gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern

2011-09-15 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50411 Bug #: 50411 Summary: gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/46072] AIX linker chokes on debug info for uninitialized static variables

2011-09-15 Thread vovata at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072 --- Comment #33 from vladimir penev vovata at gmail dot com 2011-09-15 08:44:04 UTC --- An update on this subject at my side. After some interactions with IBM AIX support there is a fix https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IV06344

[Bug fortran/50412] New: gfortran -Ofast ICE in vect_do_peeling_for_loop_bound

2011-09-15 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50412 Bug #: 50412 Summary: gfortran -Ofast ICE in vect_do_peeling_for_loop_bound Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/50413] Incorrect instruction is used to shift value of 128 bit xmm0 registrer

2011-09-15 Thread aries.nah at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413 --- Comment #1 from Anatoly aries.nah at gmail dot com 2011-09-15 08:44:57 UTC --- Created attachment 25289 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25289 C++ source code

[Bug fortran/50415] New: gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in find_uses_to_rename_use

2011-09-15 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50415 Bug #: 50415 Summary: gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in find_uses_to_rename_use Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/50413] New: Incorrect instruction is used to shift value of 128 bit xmm0 registrer

2011-09-15 Thread aries.nah at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413 Bug #: 50413 Summary: Incorrect instruction is used to shift value of 128 bit xmm0 registrer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status:

[Bug fortran/50414] New: gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in store_constructor

2011-09-15 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50414 Bug #: 50414 Summary: gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in store_constructor Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/50416] New: gfortran -O1 ICE MPFR assertion failed: 0

2011-09-15 Thread zeccav at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50416 Bug #: 50416 Summary: gfortran -O1 ICE MPFR assertion failed: 0 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/50417] New: regression: memcpy with known alignment

2011-09-15 Thread wouter.vermaelen at scarlet dot be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 Bug #: 50417 Summary: regression: memcpy with known alignment Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/50418] New: nested class typedef with same name and pointing to parent class typedef

2011-09-15 Thread frrrwww at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50418 Bug #: 50418 Summary: nested class typedef with same name and pointing to parent class typedef Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/50413] Incorrect instruction is used to shift value of 128 bit xmm0 registrer

2011-09-15 Thread aries.nah at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413 --- Comment #2 from Anatoly aries.nah at gmail dot com 2011-09-15 09:05:03 UTC --- Forgot to mention: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz LGA1156 And there's no such bug in GCC 4.3.4

[Bug libstdc++/41816] ldconfig warnings vs. libstdc++.so.6.0.14-gdb.py

2011-09-15 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41816 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus

[Bug c++/50399] [c++11] Lookup error w/ enums

2011-09-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50399 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-15 09:21:30 UTC --- I think G++ is correct, see [basic.lookup.qual] In C++03 a nested-name-specifier can only refer to a class or namespace, in C++11 it can also refer to an

[Bug c++/50399] [c++11] Lookup error w/ enums

2011-09-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50399 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/50400] compiler accepts invalid X::Impl::Impl::Impl::.....::foo

2011-09-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50400 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-15 09:34:52 UTC --- EDG accepts it too, are you suggesting MSVC is right and all the others wrong? That would be a first ;) See

[Bug tree-optimization/50414] gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in store_constructor

2011-09-15 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50414 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Component|fortran

[Bug tree-optimization/50415] gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in find_uses_to_rename_use

2011-09-15 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50415 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/50414] gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in store_constructor

2011-09-15 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50414 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/41816] ldconfig warnings vs. libstdc++.so.6.0.14-gdb.py

2011-09-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41816 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-15 10:04:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) Why don't we just install this file in /usr/share/gdb/auto-load/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.7.0/ instead of

[Bug tree-optimization/50412] gfortran -Ofast ICE in vect_do_peeling_for_loop_bound

2011-09-15 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50412 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/50344] friend declaration confused by const qualifier

2011-09-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50344 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-15 10:06:31 UTC --- Thanks Paolo - I forgot to add a follow-up comment to say I'd tested it

[Bug tree-optimization/50414] [4.7 Regression] gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in store_constructor

2011-09-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50414 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in |[4.7

[Bug tree-optimization/50415] [4.7 Regression] gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in find_uses_to_rename_use

2011-09-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50415 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in |[4.7

[Bug fortran/50416] gfortran -O1 ICE MPFR assertion failed: 0

2011-09-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50416 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-15 10:39:12 UTC --- It works for me with -O1, -Ofast, and -m32 -Ofast. I used x86_64-apple-darwin10 with GMP version 5.0.2, MPFR version 3.0.1, MPC version 0.9 Likely a

[Bug libstdc++/41816] ldconfig warnings vs. libstdc++.so.6.0.14-gdb.py

2011-09-15 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41816 --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2011-09-15 10:50:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #6) Why don't we just install this file in

[Bug fortran/50411] gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern

2011-09-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50411 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-15 10:55:19 UTC --- Likely a duplicate of pr50343 fixed by revision 178775. I use this pr for some general comments: (1) follow the Mikael Morin's advice in pr50375

[Bug fortran/50409] SIGSEGV in gfc_simplify_expr

2011-09-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50409 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/50410] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in record_reference

2011-09-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug testsuite/50076] FAIL: c-c++-common/cxxbitfields-3.c scan-assembler movl.*, var on x86_64-apple-darwin10

2011-09-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50076 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at

[Bug fortran/50401] SIGSEGV in resolve_transfer

2011-09-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50401 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/50315] Regression on Atom after fix #49958

2011-09-15 Thread sergos.gnu at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50315 --- Comment #7 from Sergey Ostanevich sergos.gnu at gmail dot com 2011-09-15 11:24:27 UTC --- Richard, I believe your test should be reading as So you can go from (a +no b) +no c to a + no (b + c), dropping overflow knowledge on

[Bug tree-optimization/50414] [4.7 Regression] gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in store_constructor

2011-09-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50414 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-15 11:27:35 UTC --- This is a regression that occurred between revisions 173852 (OK) and 175707 (ICE). If needed, I'll be able to narrow the range later today. 173817

[Bug tree-optimization/50415] [4.7 Regression] gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in find_uses_to_rename_use

2011-09-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50415 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-15 11:30:14 UTC --- This is a regression that occurred in the same range as pr50414 (between revisions 173852 (OK) and 175707 (ICE)). r174030 is OK r174283 gives the

[Bug tree-optimization/50415] [4.7 Regression] gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in find_uses_to_rename_use

2011-09-15 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50415 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2011-09-15 11:33:16 UTC --- '-O2 -ftree-vectorize' is OK, '-O3' gives the ICE.

[Bug libstdc++/41816] ldconfig warnings vs. libstdc++.so.6.0.14-gdb.py

2011-09-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41816 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-15 11:33:50 UTC --- Hmm yes, this is only really an issue for people who install libstdc++ into a directory that ldconfig searches, which for most people means it only affects

[Bug tree-optimization/50412] gfortran -Ofast ICE in vect_do_peeling_for_loop_bound

2011-09-15 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50412 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/50403] SIGSEGV in gfc_use_derived

2011-09-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50403 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Keywords|

[Bug c++/50418] nested class typedef with same name and pointing to parent class typedef

2011-09-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50418 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-15 12:17:48 UTC --- [basic.scope.class] A name N used in a class S shall refer to the same declaration in its context and when re-evaluated in the completed scope of S. No

[Bug c++/50418] nested class typedef with same name and pointing to parent class typedef

2011-09-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50418 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-15 12:29:38 UTC --- you can use -fpermissive to make G++ accept the code

[Bug tree-optimization/50414] [4.7 Regression] gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in store_constructor

2011-09-15 Thread irar at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50414 Ira Rosen irar at il dot ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/50413] Incorrect instruction is used to shift value of 128 bit xmm0 registrer

2011-09-15 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/50411] gfortran -Ofast SIGSEGV in vect_recog_dot_prod_pattern

2011-09-15 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50411 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/50343] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/id-22.f

2011-09-15 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50343 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/50408] ICE in transfer_expr

2011-09-15 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50408 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/50413] Incorrect instruction is used to shift value of 128 bit xmm0 registrer

2011-09-15 Thread aries.nah at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413 Anatoly aries.nah at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50406] ld undefined reference to __MOD_str

2011-09-15 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50406 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50405] allocation LOOP or SIGSEGV

2011-09-15 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50405 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50404] SIGSEGV in gfc_resolve_close

2011-09-15 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50404 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50402] ICE in gfc_conv_expr_descriptor

2011-09-15 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50402 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/46072] AIX linker chokes on debug info for uninitialized static variables

2011-09-15 Thread skunk at iskunk dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072 --- Comment #34 from Daniel Richard G. skunk at iskunk dot org 2011-09-15 14:01:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #33) Vladimir, this [GCC] bug report has nothing to do with the assembler segfaulting. The problem is that the linker can't link what

[Bug c++/50418] nested class typedef with same name and pointing to parent class typedef

2011-09-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50418 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/50365] [4.7 Regression] non-static data member error on valid code

2011-09-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50365 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/50419] New: Bad interaction between data-ref and disambiguation with restrict pointers

2011-09-15 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50419 Bug #: 50419 Summary: Bad interaction between data-ref and disambiguation with restrict pointers Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status:

[Bug target/46072] AIX linker chokes on debug info for uninitialized static variables

2011-09-15 Thread vovata at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072 --- Comment #35 from vladimir penev vovata at gmail dot com 2011-09-15 14:14:16 UTC --- Yes, it's true. And using the mentioned efix for AIX the problem doesn't exist any more, the assembler generates correct code and the linker links it as well.

[Bug tree-optimization/50419] Bad interaction between data-ref and disambiguation with restrict pointers

2011-09-15 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50419 --- Comment #1 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-15 14:16:54 UTC --- Created attachment 25293 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25293 (untested) patch Potential fix for this. As yet untested.

[Bug tree-optimization/50413] Incorrect instruction is used to shift value of 128 bit xmm0 registrer

2011-09-15 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413 --- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com 2011-09-15 14:17:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) We have V.bitmap.b63 = V.bitmap.b64; to shift a lower bit of the upper quadword but GCC has decided not to do this. Ah, I didn't

[Bug tree-optimization/50413] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Incorrect instruction is used to shift value of 128 bit xmm0 registrer

2011-09-15 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50413 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/50361] [C++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with std::initializer_list and nullptr

2011-09-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50361 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-15 14:33:29 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Sep 15 14:33:24 2011 New Revision: 178882 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178882 Log: PR c++/50361 *

[Bug c++/50365] [4.7 Regression] non-static data member error on valid code

2011-09-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50365 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-15 14:33:42 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu Sep 15 14:33:37 2011 New Revision: 178883 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178883 Log: PR c++/50365 *

[Bug c++/50365] [4.7 Regression] non-static data member error on valid code

2011-09-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50365 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/50361] [C++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with std::initializer_list and nullptr

2011-09-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50361 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug lto/50394] [meta-bug] Issues with building libreoffice with LTO

2011-09-15 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-15 15:39:18 UTC --- Thanks a lot! is there any chance to get those fixes into official git so we don't need to cummulate local patches? :)

[Bug fortran/50404] SIGSEGV in gfc_resolve_close

2011-09-15 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50404 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug lto/50394] [meta-bug] Issues with building libreoffice with LTO

2011-09-15 Thread markus at trippelsdorf dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2011-09-15 16:48:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Thanks a lot! is there any chance to get those fixes into official git so we don't need to cummulate local patches? :)

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

2011-09-15 Thread oleg at smolsky dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #13 from oleg at smolsky dot net 2011-09-15 16:53:26 UTC --- David, it looks like we are seeing different things with v4.7... See my comment 11 - I am still observing the slowdown. Do you have access to v4.1 and v4.6? Could you try

[Bug fortran/50407] compiler confused by .operator.

2011-09-15 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50407 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/2316] g++ fails to overload on language linkage

2011-09-15 Thread marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2316 --- Comment #34 from Marc Glisse marc.glisse at normalesup dot org 2011-09-15 16:53:33 UTC --- I posted a related demangler patch on gcc-patches a couple weeks ago, let me just link it from here so it doesn't get lost:

[Bug fortran/50420] New: [Coarray] lcobound doesn't accept coarray subcomponents

2011-09-15 Thread mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50420 Bug #: 50420 Summary: [Coarray] lcobound doesn't accept coarray subcomponents Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcj/50421] New: [4.7 Regression] GC Warning: Out of Memory! Returning NIL!

2011-09-15 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50421 Bug #: 50421 Summary: [4.7 Regression] GC Warning: Out of Memory! Returning NIL! Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/50182] Performance degradation from gcc 4.1 (x86_64)

2011-09-15 Thread xinliangli at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182 --- Comment #14 from davidxl xinliangli at gmail dot com 2011-09-15 17:28:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) David, it looks like we are seeing different things with v4.7... See my comment 11 - I am still observing the slowdown. Do you have

[Bug c/50422] New: -Wswitch warns about unhandled cases in nested switches

2011-09-15 Thread devel at fresse dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50422 Bug #: 50422 Summary: -Wswitch warns about unhandled cases in nested switches Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/50401] SIGSEGV in resolve_transfer

2011-09-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50401 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-15 17:48:36 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Thu Sep 15 17:48:27 2011 New Revision: 178889 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178889 Log: 2011-09-15 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/50403] SIGSEGV in gfc_use_derived

2011-09-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50403 --- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-15 17:48:36 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Thu Sep 15 17:48:27 2011 New Revision: 178889 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178889 Log: 2011-09-15 Janus Weil ja...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/50401] SIGSEGV in resolve_transfer

2011-09-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50401 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/50403] SIGSEGV in gfc_use_derived

2011-09-15 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50403 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50423] New: error: ‘getpid’ was not declared in this scope

2011-09-15 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50423 Bug #: 50423 Summary: error: ‘getpid’ was not declared in this scope Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/50423] error: ‘getpid’ was not declared in this scope

2011-09-15 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50423 --- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-09-15 17:57:08 UTC --- Attached bzip2 compressed preprocessed source for common/semaphore.cc reproduces this issue... [MacPro:~/xplor-nih-2.27/common/bin.Darwin_11_x86_64]

[Bug c++/50423] error: ‘getpid’ was not declared in this scope

2011-09-15 Thread howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50423 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2011-09-15 17:57:45 UTC --- Note that -fpermissive doesn't eliminate the regression.

[Bug c++/50424] New: G++ doesn't notice possible throw from default argument

2011-09-15 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50424 Bug #: 50424 Summary: G++ doesn't notice possible throw from default argument Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/50423] error: ‘getpid’ was not declared in this scope

2011-09-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50423 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/50409] SIGSEGV in gfc_simplify_expr

2011-09-15 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50409 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/50425] New: precedence rule for pre/post increamet/decreament and effect of white spaces

2011-09-15 Thread grj017 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50425 Bug #: 50425 Summary: precedence rule for pre/post increamet/decreament and effect of white spaces Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status:

[Bug c/50425] precedence rule for pre/post increamet/decreament and effect of white spaces

2011-09-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50425 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/50341] calls via function pointer wrongly scheduled giving invalid TOC pointer

2011-09-15 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50341 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||meissner at

[Bug target/50341] calls via function pointer wrongly scheduled giving invalid TOC pointer

2011-09-15 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50341 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-15 18:34:11 UTC --- Created attachment 25295 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25295 Patch for GCC 4.6 that disables the split of the load of the new TOC

[Bug target/50341] calls via function pointer wrongly scheduled giving invalid TOC pointer

2011-09-15 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50341 --- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-15 18:34:44 UTC --- Created attachment 25296 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25296 Patch for GCC 4.7 that disables the split of the load of the new TOC

[Bug plugins/45348] cp/cp-tree.h in plugin header does not work.

2011-09-15 Thread eraman at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45348 --- Comment #2 from eraman at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-15 19:18:30 UTC --- Author: eraman Date: Thu Sep 15 19:18:26 2011 New Revision: 178892 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=178892 Log: Backport r176741 from trunk. 2011-09-15

  1   2   >