http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
Andrey Belevantsev abel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52500
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
08:26:03 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 6 08:25:51 2012
New Revision: 184976
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184976
Log:
Backported from 4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
08:26:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 08:13 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
I've tested your latest patch on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu with trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934
--- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
08:26:32 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Mar 6 08:26:22 2012
New Revision: 184977
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184977
Log:
Backported from 4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #15 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
08:49:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
I've run the testsuite on rev 184966 (without fortran though), but the
failures
that you've mentioned did not show up.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #16 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
09:48:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
I've seen same failures on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu for trunk rev 184971.
With backing r184966 changes out, they went away. Weird.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
09:54:11 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 6 09:54:06 2012
New Revision: 184981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184981
Log:
2012-03-06 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52097
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51255
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52493
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #17 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
10:36:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 26837
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26837
preprocessed file ctype_configure_char.i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #18 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
10:37:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 26838
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26838
worked .s file ctype_configure_char_good.s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #19 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
10:38:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 26839
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26839
unworked .s file ctype_configure_char_bad.s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #20 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
10:40:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Can we keep the r184966 changes anyways? I will keep an eye on these failures
whether I can reproduce them. If you have some
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52493
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
10:58:55 UTC ---
Reduced testcase, fails at -O -ftree-vectorize:
struct Time {
long int sec;
long usec;
};
struct Flow {
unsigned short iif;
struct Time
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50970
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52505
Bug #: 52505
Summary: [avr]: __memx address space reading unintentionally
from RAM
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52505
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #21 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
11:29:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
I've confirmed that 22_locale/ctype/is/char/3.cc doesn't fail
if linking with libstdc++.a which is built with the compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52506
Bug #: 52506
Summary: [avr]: XMEGA: Wrong order of save/restore of
RAMPX/Y/Z/D SFRs in ISR pro-/epilogue
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52506
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52507
Bug #: 52507
Summary: [avr]: movmem loop for __memx address space uses wrong
loop label
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52507
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52508
Bug #: 52508
Summary: [avr]: HAVE_RAMPZ as condition to set RAMPZ prior to
flash-read is no more appropriate
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52508
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52494
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51673
Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32120
--- Comment #10 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06 12:06:08
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
I still have an unfinished patch to convert SCCVN to
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=512536
I'm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52509
Bug #: 52509
Summary: target libstdc++-v3 should not be bootstrapped,
libstdc++-v3 should also be a host_module
(bootstrapped)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52472
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
12:35:09 UTC ---
convert_debug_memory_address can just return NULL_RTX if it can't handle it.
Can't reproduce this though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
12:43:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
This is mostly the same behaviour as described by
darkdragon2000 in bug 44940, except that it also happens in the application
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |gjl at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47477
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
12:48:30 UTC ---
Related to PR45397.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45397
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
12:48:19 UTC ---
Related to PR47477.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52509
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52493
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52493
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
13:13:21 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Mar 6 13:13:14 2012
New Revision: 184987
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184987
Log:
2012-03-06 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52509
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
13:15:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Well, for profiledbootstrap I think it is nice if target-libstdc++-v3 is
actually bootstrapped, because then we are able to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52509
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
13:31:35 UTC ---
I guess bootstrapping of the host libstdc++-v3 if it is performed is fine.
20120302 and 20120306, mainline doesn't bootstrap on Solaris any
longer:
compiling libitm/config/posix/rwlock.cc fails like this:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libitm/config/posix/rwlock.cc: In constructor
'GTM::gtm_rwlock::gtm_rwlock()':
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/libitm/config/posix/rwlock.cc:40
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52510
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06 13:59:33 UTC
---
Created attachment 26840
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26840
preprocessed input
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52463
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
14:38:00 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Mar 6 14:37:54 2012
New Revision: 184991
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184991
Log:
PR middle-end/52463
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52463
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
14:44:31 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Tue Mar 6 14:44:27 2012
New Revision: 184992
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=184992
Log:
PR middle-end/52463
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52511
Bug #: 52511
Summary: gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-8.c times out on
Solaris/SPARC
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52511
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06 15:01:21 UTC
---
Created attachment 26842
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26842
-ftime-report output on apoc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52511
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06 15:00:50 UTC
---
Created attachment 26841
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26841
-ftime-report output on s8.mayon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52511
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
16:02:07 UTC ---
* Is there some codegen problem leading to the factor 2 slowdown from sun4u
to sun4v?
UltraSPARC T1/T2 are just trounced by UltraSPARC III+/IV when it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182
--- Comment #37 from oleg at smolsky dot net 2012-03-06 16:34:27 UTC ---
Hey Jakub, is this smaller example digestable?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26814
The asm output is straightforward, but I obviously have no clue about
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52512
Bug #: 52512
Summary: Cannot match namelist object name
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52452
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
17:08:07 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Mar 6 17:08:01 2012
New Revision: 185005
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185005
Log:
2012-03-06 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52452
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
17:09:55 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Tue Mar 6 17:09:48 2012
New Revision: 185006
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185006
Log:
2012-03-06 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50310
--- Comment #17 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
17:15:57 UTC ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Mar 6 17:15:43 2012
New Revision: 185007
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185007
Log:
2012-03-05
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182
--- Comment #38 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
17:26:24 UTC ---
Sorry, can't reproduce any performance degradation between 4.1 and 4.6
on the http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26814 testcase (-O3 -m64,
default
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52512
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52452
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
17:36:07 UTC ---
Fixed for on the 4.6 branch for 4.6.4 (the 4.6.3 release was missed) and on the
4.5 branch.
For 4.7, the backport will happen after the 4.7.0 release (i.e.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51902
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51673
Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51673
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
18:43:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
i've found the core issue for problem mentioned in comment 12.
the --disable-nls configure option causes missing x64 .dll exports
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52372
--- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-06 19:22:14 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Mar 6 19:22:10 2012
New Revision: 185013
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185013
Log:
gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50182
--- Comment #39 from oleg at smolsky dot net 2012-03-06 19:39:03 UTC ---
Hmm... funky. I can reproduce the issue on a newer Intel machine:
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50310
--- Comment #18 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
19:46:32 UTC ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Mar 6 19:46:28 2012
New Revision: 185014
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185014
Log:
2012-03-06
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52503
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kkojima at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51673
--- Comment #16 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com 2012-03-06 20:19:24 UTC ---
I think --disable-nls should be purely a *host* configure option - it's a
bug if it affects anything at all about libstdc++.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52218
Michael Hope michael.hope at linaro dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.hope
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52513
Bug #: 52513
Summary: gcc-4.7.0-RC-20120302 fails to build for
i686-pc-cygwin
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50310
--- Comment #19 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
20:48:56 UTC ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:48:52 2012
New Revision: 185016
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185016
Log:
2012-03-05
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50310
--- Comment #20 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
20:56:16 UTC ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Mar 6 20:56:09 2012
New Revision: 185017
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185017
Log:
Merge up to 185014
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52514
Bug #: 52514
Summary: --disable-nls changes libstdc++-7.dll export table.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51673
--- Comment #17 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2012-03-06 21:04:40
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
(In reply to comment #14)
i've found the core issue for problem mentioned in comment 12.
the --disable-nls configure option causes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52515
Bug #: 52515
Summary: [4.8 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf in
unwind-dw2.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52515
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|cris-axis-elf |cris-axis-elf,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52512
Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50310
--- Comment #21 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
21:50:55 UTC ---
Author: meissner
Date: Tue Mar 6 21:50:45 2012
New Revision: 185018
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=185018
Log:
Merge up to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52516
Bug #: 52516
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/lto/pr45586*
f_lto_pr45586*_0.o-f_lto_pr45586_0.o link, -O0 -flto
(internal compiler error)
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41043
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41043
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52515
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
22:19:03 UTC ---
It's obviously the change in how/when cc0 is created:
(gdb) r -O2 -fpreprocessed unwind-dw2.i
Starting program:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52515
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|regression |middle-end
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52515
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52516
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|*86*-*-*|*86*-*-*,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52503
--- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
23:18:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 26845
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26845
A patch
config/sh/linux.h requires a few changes too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52517
Bug #: 52517
Summary: Bug in PPC pointer arithmetic
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52517
--- Comment #1 from Jeroen Demeyer jdemeyer at cage dot ugent.be 2012-03-06
23:20:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 26847
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26847
Testcase, file 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #22 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-06
23:42:15 UTC ---
This is a reduced test case:
int test (volatile int* a, int b, int c)
{
a[1] = b != 0;
if (b == 0)
a[10] = c;
return b == 0;
}
with '-O2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52517
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49330
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jdemeyer at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52518
Bug #: 52518
Summary: gcc fails to find pch files in subincludes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52518
--- Comment #1 from casey at rodarmor dot com 2012-03-07 00:55:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 26848
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26848
A script showing the bug.
text was not specified
by the executable; setting a breakpoint in a shared library which
is not privately mapped will not work. See the HP-UX 11i v3 chatr
manpage for methods to privately map shared library text.
GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.8.0 20120306 (experimental) [trunk revision 185013]
(hppa2.0w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52471
--- Comment #3 from Kyle Markley kyle at arbyte dot us 2012-03-07 02:15:15
UTC ---
Another note for my appendix about edits to get things going on x86_64-openbsd.
I needed to #include sys/time.h in gcc/libiberty/stack-limit.c before
including
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52518
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-07
02:32:04 UTC ---
This is expected as the token is #include .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52518
--- Comment #3 from casey at rodarmor dot com 2012-03-07 02:34:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
This is expected as the token is #include .
The documentation suggests that that shouldn't be a problem:
you can even include a precompiled header
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52519
--- Comment #1 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-03-07 03:05:54 UTC ---
Appears to have been introduced by r185013.
Dave
--
John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net
94 matches
Mail list logo
