http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-05-09 06:29:40 UTC ---
Hi Honza,
I forgot to say that I tried both
-flto-partition=1to1
and
-flto-partition=none
with the same result
the point is that the symbols in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53290
Bug #: 53290
Summary: ICE compiling aermod with Ofast
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53291
Bug #: 53291
Summary: Code generated for xtest is wrong
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53290
Venkataramanan venkataramanan.kumar at amd dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292
Bug #: 53292
Summary: multi-threaded (OpenMP) is slower than single-threaded
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53271
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09 08:17:24
UTC ---
Author: amodra
Date: Wed May 9 08:17:09 2012
New Revision: 187316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187316
Log:
PR target/53271
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53271
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53271
--- Comment #4 from hainque at adacore dot com hainque at adacore dot com
2012-05-09 08:52:01 UTC ---
On May 9, 2012, at 10:18 , amodra at gmail dot com wrote:
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com 2012-05-09 08:18:09
UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
09:10:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Hi Honza,
I forgot to say that I tried both
-flto-partition=1to1
and
-flto-partition=none
with the same result
the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53290
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53217
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292
--- Comment #1 from FH fh_p at hotmail dot com 2012-05-09 09:17:29 UTC ---
I am not sure to know if this problem is related rather to gcc or rather to
Ubuntu. I started with the assumption that is should rather to related to
gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249
--- Comment #11 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-05-09 09:23:03 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed May 9 09:22:57 2012
New Revision: 187320
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187320
Log:
gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #6 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-05-09 09:39:54 UTC ---
On 9 May, 2012, at 11:10 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
All hidden symbols are postfixed with something like .local.77.4195, making
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53293
Bug #: 53293
Summary: Internal Compiler Error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53293
--- Comment #1 from vikram vikram2rhyme at gmail dot com 2012-05-09 09:46:11
UTC ---
Created attachment 27353
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27353
Preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53293
--- Comment #2 from vikram vikram2rhyme at gmail dot com 2012-05-09 09:48:00
UTC ---
ICE:SEGFAULT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #8 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-05-09 10:03:33 UTC ---
On 9 May, 2012, at 11:58 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Ok, so the question would be - why does GCC think this symbol is not
possibly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
10:15:21 UTC ---
Btw, the testcase does not reproduce for me. What binutils version and which
linker do you use? Do you actually end up using -fuse-linker-plugin?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292
--- Comment #2 from FH fh_p at hotmail dot com 2012-05-09 10:16:52 UTC ---
I have just tested on another computer (CPU : Xeon5650 12 cores + OS :
Scientific Linux) = I reproduce the unexpected behavior (OpenMP slower than
single-threaded).
So, I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53294
Bug #: 53294
Summary: Optimize out some exception code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #10 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-05-09 10:40:08 UTC ---
On 9 May, 2012, at 12:15 PM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #9 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53289
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #11 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-05-09 10:47:02 UTC ---
if I add -fuse-linker-plugin I get
c++: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
my understanding was that since 4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #2 from José Luis García Pallero jgpallero at gmail dot com
2012-05-09 10:50:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 27354
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27354
Original C code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #3 from José Luis García Pallero jgpallero at gmail dot com
2012-05-09 10:51:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 27355
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27355
Preprocessed with -O0 optimization flag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #4 from José Luis García Pallero jgpallero at gmail dot com
2012-05-09 10:51:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 27356
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27356
Preprocessed with -O1 optimization flag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53287
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #5 from José Luis García Pallero jgpallero at gmail dot com
2012-05-09 10:52:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 27357
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27357
Preprocessed with -O2 optimization flag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #6 from José Luis García Pallero jgpallero at gmail dot com
2012-05-09 10:53:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 27358
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27358
Preprocessed with -O3 optimization flag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #7 from José Luis García Pallero jgpallero at gmail dot com
2012-05-09 10:54:33 UTC ---
Hello:
I attach the preprocessed files with optimization flags -O0, -O1, -O2 and -O3
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #8 from José Luis García Pallero jgpallero at gmail dot com
2012-05-09 10:56:34 UTC ---
I have used gcc 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50476
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50359
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53284
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-05-09 11:45:10 UTC ---
--- Comment #1 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-08
22:39:35 UTC ---
Can you investigate why configure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50476
--- Comment #3 from Rui Maciel rui.maciel at gmail dot com 2012-05-09
11:47:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I think it is only undefined behaviour to access the pointer after the
life-time of y has finished, however, the following probably
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53293
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09 12:06:37
UTC ---
typedef struct {
unsigned Ebits_to_go ;
int C
} * EncodingEnvironmentPtr ;
arienco_done_encoding ( EncodingEnvironmentPtr eep ) {
if ( ( eep -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53295
Bug #: 53295
Summary: Vectorizer support for non-constant strided loads
depends on gather support overwriting the data-ref
with bogus data
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53295
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
12:15:43 UTC ---
The testcase probably only fails on SPU (the only target besides x86 that
has target support for vect_double according to the testsuite harness ...)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53226
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
12:19:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 9 12:19:34 2012
New Revision: 187328
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187328
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz 2012-05-09 12:21:38
UTC ---
if I add -fuse-linker-plugin I get
c++: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
my understanding was that since 4.6 linker-plugin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53226
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53290
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-05-09
12:33:16 UTC ---
As a temporary work around for aermod.f90, you can compile it with
'-fprotect-parens -Ofast' (it does not work for the code in pr53217).
Also a patch
-multilib --enable-linker-plugin
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.8.0 20120509 (experimental) [trunk revision 187326] (GCC)
and I get
c++ -fuse-linker-plugin -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -O2 -flto -shared -fPIC -o
bha.so d1.cc d2.cc d3.cc
c++: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292
--- Comment #4 from FH fh_p at hotmail dot com 2012-05-09 12:53:46 UTC ---
I don't understand your answer.
Timing just times the for loop. Checking array content is single threaded :
this is added to make sure the for loop has done the job
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292
FH fh_p at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18437
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
12:59:49 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed May 9 12:59:46 2012
New Revision: 187330
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187330
Log:
2012-05-09 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #11 from José Luis García Pallero jgpallero at gmail dot com
2012-05-09 13:06:56 UTC ---
Report to glibc sent
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
13:11:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
This is PR51294.
Looks different. Here the compiler complains about casting 0 to size_t.
And there is PR52617.
That one is not a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52617
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48423
--- Comment #11 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-05-09 13:16:30 UTC ---
I found the reference in the binutil bugzilla
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12629
was fixed by Ian in gold on 2011-06-30.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249
--- Comment #13 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
13:32:22 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed May 9 13:32:13 2012
New Revision: 187331
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187331
Log:
Add a test for PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
13:45:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
if I add -fuse-linker-plugin I get
c++: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
my understanding
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53294
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292
--- Comment #7 from FH fh_p at hotmail dot com 2012-05-09 14:36:00 UTC ---
Well...
Still don't really get why it is not possible to improve performance for such
basic things. I tried with allocations up to 7 Gb or more (RAM full + SWAP
full) : I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53282
--- Comment #15 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-05-09 14:48:20 UTC ---
I'm indeed using a ld that is not the one of the system.
googling around I found this:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gcc.help/41304
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53292
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
15:01:24 UTC ---
Just try equivalent pthread program and you'll note the same behavior.
#include pthread.h
#include stdlib.h
double *p;
int c;
void *tf (void *x)
{
int i,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #14 from José Luis García Pallero jgpallero at gmail dot com
2012-05-09 15:01:30 UTC ---
Fixed in glibc:
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14083
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53291
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45424
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
15:36:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 27359
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27359
Draft patch: is_contiguous.diff
Attached is a mostly ready patch for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53296
Bug #: 53296
Summary: Segfault on non-constant character array constructor
containing kind spec
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
15:52:48 UTC ---
A simpler testcase:
int main() {
char i = 1;
char x = ((void) i, 0);
x = i ? x : ((void) i, 0);
return 0;
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53287
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
15:56:15 UTC ---
I'm pretty sure this is a dup - it's at least discussed in another bug I've
commented on, w.r.t self-init of a std::string
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53281
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53275
birender.singh at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45424
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53297
Bug #: 53297
Summary: Linker error on solaris 10 using gcc-4.4.4 64bit.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53275
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31351
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53185
--- Comment #6 from Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09 16:08:37
UTC ---
Author: matz
Date: Wed May 9 16:08:26 2012
New Revision: 187340
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187340
Log:
PR tree-optimization/53185
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50461
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton nickc at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09 16:20:33
UTC ---
Author: nickc
Date: Wed May 9 16:20:17 2012
New Revision: 187341
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187341
Log:
PR bootstrap/50461
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53297
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53297
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53275
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-05-09
16:28:20 UTC ---
*** Bug 53297 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53256
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
16:29:06 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed May 9 16:28:53 2012
New Revision: 187342
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187342
Log:
PR target/53256
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53256
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
16:39:39 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed May 9 16:39:33 2012
New Revision: 187343
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187343
Log:
Backport from 2012-05-12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53185
Michael Matz matz at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53238
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
16:44:07 UTC ---
Hmm, I guess this is for the case where gthr-aix.h includes gthr-single.h,
which doesn't define the C++11 interface. The configure script determined that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53291
--- Comment #2 from Yukhin Kirill kirill.yukhin at intel dot com 2012-05-09
16:53:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Testcase?
It is trivial, so posting right here:
#include immintrin.h
unsigned a;
int
rtm_xtest (void)
{
if (_xtest ())
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ra |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53256
Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53298
Bug #: 53298
Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_scalarized_array_ref for ARRAY +
substring
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
17:12:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
You might try configuring with --disable-libstdcxx-threads. It
disables C++11 threads support.
guard.cc is always built, it's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53291
--- Comment #3 from Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org 2012-05-09
17:17:56 UTC ---
Correction. We can keep the xor %reg,%reg. We just need it because setnz only
sets 8 bit to initialize the higher order bits.
Alternatively the value can
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53296
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53288
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53275
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09
17:31:17 UTC ---
This Bugzilla is for bugs in GCC, not help fixing your code.
Please use the gcc-h...@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for questions about using GCC
and help fixing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53284
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44141
--- Comment #20 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05-09 18:06:52 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed May 9 18:06:47 2012
New Revision: 187347
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=187347
Log:
PR target/44141
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53299
Bug #: 53299
Summary: libiberty usage of GCC_PICFLAG causes -fPIC to be
passed to non-GNU compiler
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53270
--- Comment #15 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-05-09 18:45:15 UTC ---
On 5/9/2012 1:12 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
We might want to put something in config/os/gnu-linux/os_defines.h so that the
macro is defined when using
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #16 from Sriraman Tallam tmsriram at google dot com 2012-05-09
19:03:01 UTC ---
Bug fixed, patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00694.html
Thanks for trying,
-Sri.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:18 AM,
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
