http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54413
--- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
09:12:35 UTC ---
Ed, N.B. if you use the ChangeLog entry as the svn commit log then the PR
number in the log means Bugzilla gets automatically updated with a link to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55280
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55280
--- Comment #3 from Guangmu Zhu guangmuzhu at gmail dot com 2012-11-12
09:22:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
As Andrew said, this is not a bug, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_vexing_parse
You can force it to be parsed as
version 4.8.0 20121112 (experimental) [trunk revision 193427] (GCC)
same with
bzip2 -d PhiPattern.ii.bz2
pb-d-128-141-131-26:bugs48 innocent$ c++ -std=gnu++11 -O3 -c PhiPattern.ii
pb-d-128-141-131-26:bugs48 innocent$ c++ -std=gnu++11 -Ofast -c PhiPattern.ii
plugins/PhiPattern.cc: In member function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54127
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
).
gcc version 4.8.0 20121112 (experimental) (GCC)
module mod
use omp_lib
type :: my_t
integer :: i
end type my_t
contains
subroutine init( this )
class( my_t ) :: this
!type( my_t ) :: this
write(*,*) 'init thread=',omp_get_thread_num()
this%i=2
end subroutine init
end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55281
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41993
--- Comment #12 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
10:35:12 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Kaz, can you please test following patch, if it works ok SH4?
Works fine. I've confirmed that there are no new
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-11-12
10:40:30 UTC ---
The culprit seems to be Rev. 189881.
Untested patch:
...
AFAICT the patch does not fix this PR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55283
Bug #: 55283
Summary: EON performance regression at -O2 due to loop
unrolling changes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55283
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
10:44:14 UTC ---
http://gcc.opensuse.org/SPEC/CINT/sb-frescobaldi.suse.de-head-64/252_eon_big.png
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55284
Bug #: 55284
Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in read_cgraph_and_symbols, at
lto/lto.c:2944 (when -MMD is passed)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2012-11-12
10:52:30 UTC ---
Actually, the patch fixed the PR (I did not use the patched version
in the previous test).
Sorry for the noise.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
11:03:46 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Nov 12 11:03:42 2012
New Revision: 193429
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193429
Log:
2012-11-12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
11:09:50 UTC ---
FIXED on the 4.8 trunk (which was only affected).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55272
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55281
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
11:46:30 UTC ---
Actually, that shorter testcase ICEs for a different reason.
static inline float
bar (float k, float j)
{
float l = 0.0f;
if (k j)
l = k;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55253
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55285
Bug #: 55285
Summary: Botan regression on ia-64 at Mar-2012
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
--- Comment #37 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
12:16:18 UTC ---
Fatigue now gets all inlining with -O3 -fwhole-program, with -O3 it gets only
half of inlining because jump functions are not able to track array
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55285
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55284
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55284
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-11-12 12:55:50 UTC ---
just
touch foo.cc
enough…
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55284
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55284
--- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-11-12 13:07:35 UTC ---
and most probably is already fixed at linker level as does not happen with
GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.23.51.20121020
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286
Bug #: 55286
Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 4% - 10%
slower
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54077
--- Comment #17 from wbrana wbrana at gmail dot com 2012-11-12 13:17:08 UTC
---
there is another bug caused by revision 175752
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54966
--- Comment #11 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-11-12 13:19:42 UTC ---
much better with
gcc version 4.8.0 20121112 (experimental) [trunk revision 193427] (GCC)
but for size 6. v1 with lto
[innocent
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55286
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-11-12
13:44:32 UTC ---
r175752 is a follow-up fix to r175589, so my guess is that it's the combination
of the two that's causing the regression.
Can you construct a small
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55230
Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkachov at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 14:47:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Note that Fortran 2003 is not supported in OpenMP 3.1. This may change with
OpenMP 4, but I'm not sure of that.
Just checked: The public
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55267
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52538
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52485
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55281
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
15:12:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 28668
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28668
gcc48-pr55281.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55287
Bug #: 55287
Summary: GCC crashes and asks to file bug report
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55287
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55281
--- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch
2012-11-12 15:37:23 UTC ---
regression removed by the patch
at first sight performances are similar to 4.7.2, so also vectorization is ok
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53475
--- Comment #13 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-11-12
15:38:12 UTC ---
Honza, I'm a bit confused here: if I understand correctly your r187631 was only
about a C++ optimization, but now I see C testcases too here?!?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55281
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 16:18:52
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
[ Using ?: with a vector condition ]
I was surprised only C++ handles this and not C BTW.
Sorry, I didn't have time to do a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55281
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
16:23:29 UTC ---
I'm just testing that, so I know it doesn't have side-effects. COND_EXPR
handling which I've copied was doing the same thing. The reason for the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55281
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 16:39:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I'm just testing that, so I know it doesn't have side-effects.
I meant: instead of testing, so the optimization still occurs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55287
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
17:01:57 UTC ---
Also this ICE is really the kernel killing the program as it ran out of
memory or it was over one of the ulimits. Most likely ran of memory.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55257
Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55257
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
17:14:41 UTC ---
It is a requirement if you want proper debug info or unwind info for the thunk,
without that (or without calling the corresponding functions yourself,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55257
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
17:21:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
It can't be called from
the middle end, because some targets need to perform various things before
final_start_function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55275
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54413
--- Comment #16 from Ed Smith-Rowland 3dw4rd at verizon dot net 2012-11-12
17:48:29 UTC ---
Thanks, So If there are several ChangeLogs in the tree to get updated which one
do I put in the svn commit? Or does it matter?
Also, I just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55287
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-11-12
17:50:20 UTC ---
Indeed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55275
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
18:04:53 UTC ---
Yep, I filed this before your reply on the list. I'm happy to change future
without using the tag, I was just being (maybe too) cautious about ABI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55288
Bug #: 55288
Summary: Improve handling/suppression of maybe-uninitialized
warnings
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27557
Carlos O'Donell carlos at systemhalted dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54413
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
18:30:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Thanks, So If there are several ChangeLogs in the tree to get updated which
one
do I put in the svn commit? Or does it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282
--- Comment #3 from Valery Weber valeryweber at hotmail dot com 2012-11-12
19:18:34 UTC ---
Thanks pointing that. Is there any reason for not allowing the classes in
openmp?
I noticed that other compilers (eg ifort, xlf) can accommodate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
Bug #: 55289
Summary: darwin bootstrap fails due to missing
libsanitizer/interception/mach_override directory and
files
Classification: Unclassified
Product:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55282
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55288
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47599
Earnie earnie at users dot sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41993
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447
--- Comment #14 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
20:22:05 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Mon Nov 12 20:21:59 2012
New Revision: 193453
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193453
Log:
gcc/
PR
-auxbase z -O2 -version -o z.s
==5815==
GNU C (GCC) version 4.8.0 20121112 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.7.2 20120921 (Red Hat 4.7.2-2), GMP version
5.0.2, MPFR version 3.1.0, MPC version 0.9
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51447
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55291
Bug #: 55291
Summary: libsanitizer doesn't build multilib
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55290
Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55292
Bug #: 55292
Summary: libsanitizer doesn't support x32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55289
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50457
--- Comment #16 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
20:57:12 UTC ---
Another thing that might be useful for dealing with atomics on SH1* and SH2*
targets is to make the compiler generate the rewind sequences in interrupt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55288
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Johnson scovich at gmail dot com 2012-11-12 21:11:43
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Why don't just initialize the variable? It seems simpler than implementing yet
another special attribute in GCC.
In the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55238
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
Bug #: 55293
Summary: Attempt to bootstrap 7.7.2 on Solaris 10 Sparc fails
with gcc/pretty-print.c:954:28: error: invalid
conversion from 'char**' to 'const char**'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
21:48:46 UTC ---
Solaris defines a non-standard iconv() signature unless you request POSIX 2001
Try adding -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600 to the compilation flags
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
21:50:08 UTC ---
Or -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55294
Bug #: 55294
Summary: Invalid RTL sharing in lower-subreg
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55294
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 21:53:58
UTC ---
Created attachment 28670
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28670
split1 and subreg2 logs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55294
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12
21:55:11 UTC ---
I think this is because:
(subreg:SF (reg/v:V2SF 167 [ a ]) 0)))
is invalid to begin with. Yes we don't reject it but I think we should.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
--- Comment #3 from Dennis Clarke dclarke at blastwave dot org 2012-11-12
22:07:29 UTC ---
OKay, I am extracting a fresh gcc 4.7.2 tarball and then running a new
bootstrap with the defines suggested. Results should appear in seven hours or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
--- Comment #4 from Dennis Clarke dclarke at blastwave dot org 2012-11-12
22:10:01 UTC ---
bootstrap fails in 71 seconds :
$ mkdir gcc-4.7.2_sparc64-sun-solaris2.10
$ cd gcc-4.7.2_sparc64-sun-solaris2.10
$ env | sort
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55295
Bug #: 55295
Summary: [SH] Add support for fipr instruction
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55295
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-12 22:39:27
UTC ---
I forgot to mention that at least there should be a target specific built-in
function to generate the fipr insn. There is already a SHmedia built-in for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
--- Comment #5 from Dennis Clarke dclarke at blastwave dot org 2012-11-12
22:44:19 UTC ---
okay, exact same failure happens with -D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L by itself.
Am trying with _XOPEN_SOURCE=600 defined. Thus far ( well past 70 secs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55296
Bug #: 55296
Summary: [SH] Add support for disinterrupt function attribute
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
--- Comment #6 from Dennis Clarke dclarke at blastwave dot org 2012-11-12
23:06:56 UTC ---
the following fails also .. and it fails early :
$
$ CC='gcc -m64 -g -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600' CXX='g++ -m64 -g -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=600' \
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55297
Bug #: 55297
Summary: 4.8 Regression: type-bound operator clashes with
abstract interface
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55298
Bug #: 55298
Summary: [SH] Add support to disable FPU usage for individual
functions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55299
Bug #: 55299
Summary: missed optimization: ASR idiom
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55297
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55300
Bug #: 55300
Summary: [SH] Add support for store queue address space
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55301
Bug #: 55301
Summary: [SH] broken sp_switch function attribute
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13
00:15:19 UTC ---
pretty-print.c already does:
ICONV_CONST char *inbuf = CONST_CAST (char *, ident);
and ICONV_CONST should be set to 'const' by
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55302
Bug #: 55302
Summary: [SH] Add support for logical ops with GBR mems
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55293
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-13
00:21:03 UTC ---
pretty-print.c already does:
ICONV_CONST char *inbuf = CONST_CAST (char *, ident);
and ICONV_CONST should be set to 'const'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55303
Bug #: 55303
Summary: [SH] Add support for clips / clipu instructions
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55291
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2012-11-13 00:33:06
UTC ---
configure.ac has
#AM_ENABLE_MULTILIB(, ..)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55304
Bug #: 55304
Summary: libsanitizer can't be used with GCC autoconf
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo