[Bug debug/55364] ICE: in remove_addr_table_entry, at dwarf2out.c:4201 with -O -gsplit-dwarf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55364 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/55408] ICE for member template definition with non-type variadic parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55408 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/55403] [4.8 Regression] ICE building libitm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55403 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/54921] [4.8 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fsched2-use-superblocks -fstack-protector -ftree-slp-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54921 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 08:34:51 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 20 08:34:43 2012 New Revision: 193647 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193647 Log: PR

[Bug bootstrap/55370] [4.8 Regression] Bad libgcc.map

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55370 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 08:36:37 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 20 08:36:31 2012 New Revision: 193648 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193648 Log: PR

[Bug debug/55094] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55094 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 08:38:22 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Nov 20 08:38:11 2012 New Revision: 193649 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193649 Log: PR

[Bug middle-end/54921] [4.8 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fsched2-use-superblocks -fstack-protector -ftree-slp-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54921 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/55370] [4.8 Regression] Bad libgcc.map

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55370 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug debug/55094] [4.7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2224

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55094 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE in |[4.7

[Bug rtl-optimization/55396] -O2 -m32 -fno-omit-frame-pointer: internal compiler error: in check_rtl, at lra.c:2007

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55396 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libstdc++/55409] New: std::list not properly wrapping access to custom allocator through allocator_traits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55409 Bug #: 55409 Summary: std::list not properly wrapping access to custom allocator through allocator_traits Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2

[Bug testsuite/55188] [4.8 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr19105.c scan-tree-dump-times reassoc1 Optimizing range tests v_[0-9]*.D. -.2, 2. and -.3, 4.[\n\r]* into 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55188 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/55409] std::list not properly wrapping access to custom allocator through allocator_traits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55409 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 09:13:36 UTC --- This is known and documented. I'm actually working on std::list next, but I don't know if it will be done for 4.8 or not.

[Bug middle-end/54630] [4.8 Regression] GCC 4.8 --enable-languages=c build fails: Undefined symbols: ___cxa_guard_acquire and ___cxa_guard_release

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54630 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/55409] std::list not properly wrapping access to custom allocator through allocator_traits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55409 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 09:24:53 UTC --- N.B. the minimal allocator interface requires operator== and operator!=, and max_size and rebind are not required.

[Bug rtl-optimization/54540] [4.8 regression] postreload incorrectly simplifies stack adjustment into constant load into SP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54540 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug libstdc++/55409] std::list not properly wrapping access to custom allocator through allocator_traits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55409 --- Comment #3 from Benjamin Kircher benjamin.kircher at gmail dot com 2012-11-20 09:31:07 UTC --- Thank you for working on it and for the remark. NB: For the next time, where can I find the documentation?

[Bug other/55410] New: [asan] bit field accesses are not instrumented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55410 Bug #: 55410 Summary: [asan] bit field accesses are not instrumented Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/54540] [4.8 regression] postreload incorrectly simplifies stack adjustment into constant load into SP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54540 --- Comment #6 from Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 09:35:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Can this be closed now? Well the comment 4 is still relevant, I suspect that there are still latent issues in

[Bug libgomp/55411] New: OMP threads lose their OMP_WAIT_POLICY when another OMP thread gets destructed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55411 Bug #: 55411 Summary: OMP threads lose their OMP_WAIT_POLICY when another OMP thread gets destructed Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3

[Bug libgomp/55411] OMP threads lose their OMP_WAIT_POLICY when another OMP thread gets destructed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55411 --- Comment #1 from jk3064 at arcor dot de 2012-11-20 10:04:08 UTC --- Created attachment 28742 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28742 example testcase compile with: g++ -fopenmp -lgomp -lboost_system -lboost_thread-mt

[Bug other/55376] [asan] libsanitizer/README.gcc must contain the exact steps to do code changes and to port code from upstream

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55376 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug libstdc++/55409] std::list not properly wrapping access to custom allocator through allocator_traits

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55409 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/55408] ICE for member template definition with non-type variadic parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55408 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug treelang/55412] New: pr47276.c fails with -fpic option.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55412 Bug #: 55412 Summary: pr47276.c fails with -fpic option. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/54540] postreload incorrectly simplifies stack adjustment into constant load into SP

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54540 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven

[Bug c++/55402] Compiling large initializer lists never finishes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55402 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/55402] Compiling large initializer lists never finishes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55402 Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/55260] [4.8 Regression] ICE: in ipa_get_parm_lattices, at ipa-cp.c:263 with -O2 -fno-inline -fipa-cp-clone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55260 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 11:20:47 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Tue Nov 20 11:20:41 2012 New Revision: 193657 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193657 Log: 2012-11-20

[Bug c++/55402] Compiling large initializer lists never finishes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55402 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 11:43:27 UTC --- I believe the expensive part here is the EH, we end up with 56000 nested try/finally constructs. With -fno-exceptions this compiles in reasonable time

[Bug tree-optimization/54471] [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/sms-8.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54471 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug treelang/55412] pr47276.c fails with -fpic option.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55412 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug libfortran/30162] [4.7/4.8 Regression] I/O with named pipes does not work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/55402] Compiling large initializer lists never finishes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55402 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/54860] [4.8 Regression]: build fails when configuring libgfortran due to recent attribute changes in core gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/55314] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Rejects some valid ALLOCATE statements

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55314 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug middle-end/55381] [4.8 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf building libgfortran with host-gcc-4.4, ICE compiling matmul_i1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55381 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org 2012-11-20 13:01:31 UTC --- Also broken on ia64 with gcc 4.3.2. /usr/local/gcc/test/Build/./gcc/xgcc -B/usr/local/gcc/test/Build/./gcc/ -B/usr/ia64-suse-linux/bin/

[Bug target/54781] [4.8 Regression] ICE in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1124

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54781 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug libstdc++/55413] New: [LTO] hashtable.h:1648 '__bbegin_bkt' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55413 Bug #: 55413 Summary: [LTO] hashtable.h:1648 '__bbegin_bkt' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] Classification: Unclassified

[Bug libstdc++/55413] [LTO] hashtable.h:1648 '__bbegin_bkt' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55413 --- Comment #1 from David Abdurachmanov david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com 2012-11-20 14:07:57 UTC --- Created attachment 28743 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28743 Testcase used.

[Bug bootstrap/55387] [4.8 Regression] Build problem: malloc error in genautomata

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55387 Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/55398] [4.8 Regression] va_arg usage with non-POD

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55398 Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libstdc++/55413] [LTO] hashtable.h:1648 '__bbegin_bkt' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55413 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/55414] New: spec2006 416.gamess compilation fails on LRA

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55414 Bug #: 55414 Summary: spec2006 416.gamess compilation fails on LRA Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/55413] [LTO] hashtable.h:1648 '__bbegin_bkt' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55413 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 14:54:22 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Nov 20 14:54:11 2012 New Revision: 193663 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193663 Log:

[Bug libstdc++/55413] [LTO] hashtable.h:1648 '__bbegin_bkt' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55413 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 14:54:48 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Nov 20 14:54:36 2012 New Revision: 193664 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193664 Log:

[Bug libstdc++/55413] [LTO] hashtable.h:1648 '__bbegin_bkt' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55413 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

Promozione Vodafone 1000 Minuti al giorno

Offerta limitata, VODAFONE per un anno intero al costo di 15,00 euro di spesa ricevi SMART 1000+ comprende : 1000 minuti gratis al giorno verso i numeri Vodafone. 1000 minuti gratis al mese verso tutti i numeri. Internet 5 GB mese, SMS illimitati Vodafone e 2500 sms verso tutti mese

[Bug target/55351] can't build libgcc for -m5-compact variant in SH64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55351 --- Comment #2 from dhowells at redhat dot com dhowells at redhat dot com 2012-11-20 15:09:42 UTC --- The first hunk of the patch that adds: MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS = *m5-64media* *m5-64media-nofpu* to gcc/config/sh/t-linux causes the

[Bug target/55351] can't build libgcc for -m5-compact variant in SH64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55351 --- Comment #3 from Dan Horák dan at danny dot cz 2012-11-20 15:15:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) The first hunk of the patch that adds: MULTILIB_EXCEPTIONS = *m5-64media* *m5-64media-nofpu* to gcc/config/sh/t-linux causes the

[Bug middle-end/54860] [4.8 Regression]: build fails when configuring libgfortran due to recent attribute changes in core gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860 --- Comment #20 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 15:26:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) Assuming fixed. Well yes! Maybe we should clear the issue on who's supposed to close PR's after a fix? I'd be happy

[Bug c++/55355] internal compiler error: in tree_low_cst, at tree.c:6415

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355 --- Comment #9 from Richard Perrin rcp at sentientmeat dot ca 2012-11-20 15:45:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) Note that, as I said already, I can't reproduce anywhere, not even in current 4_6-branch (on x86_64-linux -m32). Did you

[Bug c++/54046] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong control reaches end of non-void function for switch case with throw and default

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54046 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 16:02:33 UTC --- I don't see how. The thing is, e.g. lower_stmt resets data-cannot_fallthru on most of the statements, even if it got changed to reset it only on

[Bug target/55268] gcc4.8 mingw-w64 wrong stdcall import symbols generated after rev 193204

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55268 --- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 16:17:30 UTC --- Author: ktietz Date: Tue Nov 20 16:17:16 2012 New Revision: 193666 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193666 Log: PR

[Bug middle-end/55398] [4.8 Regression] va_arg usage with non-POD

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55398 --- Comment #8 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 16:26:24 UTC --- Author: dnovillo Date: Tue Nov 20 16:26:09 2012 New Revision: 193667 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193667 Log: Convert vec

[Bug middle-end/55398] [4.8 Regression] va_arg usage with non-POD

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55398 Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug middle-end/55403] [4.8 Regression] ICE building libitm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55403 --- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 16:34:20 UTC --- I now suspect you're missing --with-long-double-128, which would have been auto-detected given alpha glibc headers in --with-sysroot, as I have.

[Bug middle-end/55381] [4.8 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf building libgfortran with host-gcc-4.4, ICE compiling matmul_i1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55381 --- Comment #8 from Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 16:50:00 UTC --- I don't have access to old compilers locally. I'm trying with a cross from one of the sparc boxes in the farm that has gcc 4.3.2.

[Bug tree-optimization/55415] New: Early SRA produces unaligned complex types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55415 Bug #: 55415 Summary: Early SRA produces unaligned complex types Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/55415] Early SRA produces unaligned complex types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55415 --- Comment #1 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 17:08:15 UTC --- The call to get_pointer_alignment_1 at ipa-prop.c:2959 does not do what the author intended. In particular we really really need to notice the false

[Bug c++/54770] sibling call optimization is not applied where it ought to be

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54770 --- Comment #8 from Andy Jost andy.m.jost at gmail dot com 2012-11-20 17:14:18 UTC --- The workaround I mentioned in comment #5 does seem to do the trick. Specifically, something like this works in all the cases I've tried: struct

[Bug c++/54046] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong control reaches end of non-void function for switch case with throw and default

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54046 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug bootstrap/55387] [4.8 Regression] Build problem: malloc error in genautomata

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55387 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-11-20 17:43:37 UTC --- This problem no longer exists at r193669 on x86_64-apple-darwin12 with Xcode 4.5.2 so it appears that... r193667 | dnovillo | 2012-11-20

[Bug tree-optimization/55350] [4.8 Regression] verify_gimple failed with invalid (pointer) operands to plus/minus

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55350 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug rtl-optimization/19398] secondary reloads don't consider m alternatives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19398 --- Comment #14 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 18:02:49 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Tue Nov 20 18:02:36 2012 New Revision: 193671 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193671 Log: 2012-11-20 Uros Bizjak

[Bug tree-optimization/55213] vectorizer ignores __restrict__

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55213 Joshua Conner josh.m.conner at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/55381] [4.8 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf building libgfortran with host-gcc-4.4, ICE compiling matmul_i1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55381 --- Comment #9 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 18:11:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) I don't have access to old compilers locally. I'm trying with a cross from one of the sparc boxes in the farm that has

[Bug middle-end/54860] [4.8 Regression]: build fails when configuring libgfortran due to recent attribute changes in core gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54860 --- Comment #21 from Hans-Peter Nilsson hp at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 18:16:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) (In reply to comment #19) Assuming fixed. Well yes! Maybe we should clear the issue on who's supposed to close

[Bug target/55268] gcc4.8 mingw-w64 wrong stdcall import symbols generated after rev 193204

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55268 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/55416] New: New tests g++.dg/cpp0x/gen-attrs-17.2.C (et al) fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55416 Bug #: 55416 Summary: New tests g++.dg/cpp0x/gen-attrs-17.2.C (et al) fail Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/55350] [4.8 Regression] verify_gimple failed with invalid (pointer) operands to plus/minus

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55350 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 18:28:30 UTC --- Author: aldyh Date: Tue Nov 20 18:28:09 2012 New Revision: 193672 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193672 Log: PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/19398] secondary reloads don't consider m alternatives

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19398 Uros Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/55350] [4.8 Regression] verify_gimple failed with invalid (pointer) operands to plus/minus

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55350 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/54329] [4.8 Regression] gcc/cfgcleanup.o differs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54329 wbrana wbrana at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug gcov-profile/55417] New: [4.8 Regression] AddressSanitizer reports stack-buffer-overflow in profiling code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55417 Bug #: 55417 Summary: [4.8 Regression] AddressSanitizer reports stack-buffer-overflow in profiling code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/54325] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 uniform initialization syntax for argument-less abstract base class constructor fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-11-20 19:08:21 UTC --- I just tried and r175673 also rejects the reduced code in Comment #1. Let's see if I can find the exact revision where we regressed.

[Bug middle-end/55403] [4.8 Regression] ICE building libitm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55403 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 19:49:38 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Nov 20 19:49:26 2012 New Revision: 193674 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193674

[Bug middle-end/55391] [4.8 regression] ICE in adjust_address_1 at emit-rtl.c:2180 breaks bulding cross to sparc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55391 --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 19:49:39 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Nov 20 19:49:26 2012 New Revision: 193674 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193674

[Bug middle-end/55403] [4.8 Regression] ICE building libitm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55403 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/55391] [4.8 regression] ICE in adjust_address_1 at emit-rtl.c:2180 breaks bulding cross to sparc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55391 --- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 19:53:10 UTC --- I optimistically included this PR in the changelog, but please let me know if the patch doesn't in fact fix the ICE.

[Bug middle-end/54630] [4.8 Regression] GCC 4.8 --enable-languages=c build fails: Undefined symbols: ___cxa_guard_acquire and ___cxa_guard_release

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54630 --- Comment #13 from Larry Baker baker at usgs dot gov 2012-11-20 19:57:41 UTC --- Jakub, The root of the problem is because GCC required a C++ linker, but the logic in gcc/Makefile forces the linker to be $(CC) when HOST_LIBS are

[Bug middle-end/54630] [4.8 Regression] GCC 4.8 --enable-languages=c build fails: Undefined symbols: ___cxa_guard_acquire and ___cxa_guard_release

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54630 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 20:19:58 UTC --- It is intentionally that way, so that one can fine tune the C++ libraries linked into the binary with --with-host-libstdcxx, but you are responsible for

[Bug tree-optimization/55415] Early SRA produces unaligned complex types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55415 Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/38785] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] huge performance regression on EEMBC bitmnp01

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38785 --- Comment #34 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com 2012-11-20 21:00:39 UTC --- (In reply to comment #32) Would be possible to double check if this problem is still fixed after the fix to the tree-ssa-pre patch?

[Bug gcov-profile/55417] [4.8 Regression] AddressSanitizer reports stack-buffer-overflow in profiling code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55417 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2012-11-20 21:06:46 UTC --- Valgrind shows: % /var/tmp/gcc_valgrind/usr/local/bin/g++ -w -fprofile-use -O3 /home/markus/bench.cpp

[Bug rtl-optimization/55396] -O2 -m32 -fno-omit-frame-pointer: internal compiler error: in check_rtl, at lra.c:2007

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55396 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 21:33:12 UTC --- Author: vmakarov Date: Tue Nov 20 21:32:59 2012 New Revision: 193678 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=193678 Log:

[Bug c++/55418] New: Valgrind: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) in implicitly_declare_fn() method.c:1623

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55418 Bug #: 55418 Summary: Valgrind: Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) in implicitly_declare_fn() method.c:1623 Classification: Unclassified

[Bug middle-end/55391] [4.8 regression] ICE in adjust_address_1 at emit-rtl.c:2180 breaks bulding cross to sparc64-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55391 Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/55388] [4.8 regression] ICE in int_mode_for_mode at stor-layout.c:423 breaks sparc64-linux bootstrap

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55388 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2012-11-20 22:21:45 UTC --- It's caused by r193599: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-11/msg00546.html

[Bug c++/55419] New: internal compiler error: in gimplify_init_ctor_preeval, at gimplify.c:3587

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55419 Bug #: 55419 Summary: internal compiler error: in gimplify_init_ctor_preeval, at gimplify.c:3587 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug middle-end/54630] [4.8 Regression] GCC 4.8 --enable-languages=c build fails: Undefined symbols: ___cxa_guard_acquire and ___cxa_guard_release

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54630 --- Comment #15 from Larry Baker baker at usgs dot gov 2012-11-20 22:24:46 UTC --- Jakub, I undertand the reason for the --with-host-libstdcxx option. The documentation for --with-host-libstdcxx doesn't say anything about the side

[Bug c/55420] New: Gcc produces an internal compiler error (nested function with variably modified return)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55420 Bug #: 55420 Summary: Gcc produces an internal compiler error (nested function with variably modified return) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.3

[Bug middle-end/55421] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE in adjust _address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2180

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55421 Bug #: 55421 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE in adjust _address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2180 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug middle-end/55421] [4.8 Regression] ICE in adjust _address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2180

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55421 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-11-20 23:44:52 UTC --- I think this was fixed by: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2012-11/msg00621.html

[Bug middle-end/55421] [4.8 Regression] ICE in adjust _address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2180

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55421 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build,

[Bug c/55422] New: gcc does not diagnose change of linkage for a function.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55422 Bug #: 55422 Summary: gcc does not diagnose change of linkage for a function. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/55422] gcc does not diagnose change of linkage for a function.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55422 --- Comment #1 from cookevillain at yahoo dot com 2012-11-20 23:55:16 UTC --- gcc -v output, omitted in the report: - Using built-in specs. Target: i486-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure

[Bug c++/54325] [4.7/4.8 Regression] C++11 uniform initialization syntax for argument-less abstract base class constructor fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54325 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-11-21 00:41:19 UTC --- We regressed with r175639, the implementation of DR 990: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-06/msg01130.html

[Bug c++/55245] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Compiler segfault when compiling a small test case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55245 Diego Novillo dnovillo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/55419] [4.8 Regression] ICE in gimplify_init_ctor_preeval, at gimplify.c:3587

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55419 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

  1   2   >