http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55704
Bug #: 55704
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Failures building ada
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55704
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Emrich rai...@emrich-ebersheim.de 2012-12-15
10:14:47 UTC ---
The same for 4.8.0 in stage 1:
g++ -c -g -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
-W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55705
Bug #: 55705
Summary: [4.7 Regression] error: 'CLOCK_REALTIME' undeclared in
libgfortran/intrinsics/system_clock.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53952
--- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15
10:25:24 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sat Dec 15 10:25:15 2012
New Revision: 194519
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194519
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55684
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55697
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53952
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55706
Bug #: 55706
Summary: [4.8 Regression] failue to build libstdc++ in stage 1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
--- Comment #8 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 10:56:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
The following patch (which amounts to a partial revert of r156749) fixes the
behavior of comment #2 for me:
Note: The patch in comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707
Bug #: 55707
Summary: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap fails in
gcc/graphite-dependences.c error cast loses precision
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 11:00:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
The following patch (which amounts to a partial revert of r156749) fixes the
behavior of comment #2 for me:
Ugh. Apparently it was much
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30162
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51555
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51898
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54549
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52123
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55704
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55088
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53996
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55706
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15
12:43:15 UTC ---
This implies the type of std::vswprintf is wrong on that platform.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55706
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15
12:47:13 UTC ---
Ah of course, this is the fix for PR 52015
You need to use at least r5437 from the Mingw-w64 trunk for 4.8, I will update
the release notes today
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55708
Bug #: 55708
Summary: g++ crashes: constexpr function with reference
parameters.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 13:06:37 UTC ---
Here is a reduced version of internal_pack_10.f90, which is the only
runtime-failure in the testsuite for the patch in comment #9:
module mo_obs_rules
type t_set
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55706
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 13:46:26 UTC ---
Ok, revised version of the patch from comment 9, which fixes the runtime
failure on internal_pack_10.f90:
Index: gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52444
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-12-15
14:02:23 UTC ---
This issue doesn't occur under darwin10 but when object files, created under
darwin10, are linked under darwin12 this runtime failure occurs. I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52444
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-12-15
14:15:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 28977
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28977
assembly file for gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c -fprofile-generate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52444
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-12-15
14:17:18 UTC ---
One interesting thing is that slightly different assembly is generated each
time you recompile this test case...
# diff -u pr44777.s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52444
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2012-12-15
14:23:17 UTC ---
I see the same behavior on x86_64 Fedora linux...
/home/howarth/work-gcc/gcc/xgcc -B/home/howarth/work-gcc/gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55703
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55705
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55707
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 16:05:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Note: This still shows scan-tree-dump failures on assumed_type_2.f90, but now
only 2 of them at -O0 (instead of 4):
FAIL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
--- Comment #13 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15
16:16:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
Here is a reduced version of internal_pack_10.f90, which is the only
runtime-failure in the testsuite for the patch in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53876
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55709
Bug #: 55709
Summary: [4.8 Regression] Infinite loop in pointer_set_insert
compiling cp/pt.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55539
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jb at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55709
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15
16:40:10 UTC ---
So just test the same patch as in PR52894 for trunk and submit it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55680
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2012-12-15 16:44:08 UTC ---
The same problem exists for gcc 4.8.0 20121209 (experimental). The code looks
valid to me. I tried to deduce the root of the compiler problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55539
--- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 16:47:44
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
(In reply to comment #3)
Strangely enough I needed to add some epsilon to 0.5 so that
the second test passes, because the exact
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
Bug #: 55710
Summary: [C++11] Linkage errors with lambdas
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53996
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15
17:50:55 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Dec 15 17:50:49 2012
New Revision: 194520
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194520
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53996
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53766
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15
18:11:43 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Dec 15 18:11:38 2012
New Revision: 194521
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194521
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53766
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52444
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53766
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15
18:16:33 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Dec 15 18:16:28 2012
New Revision: 194522
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194522
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53766
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15
18:29:33 UTC ---
Related to PR 55015.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53359
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52735
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52735
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15
18:47:57 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Dec 15 18:47:53 2012
New Revision: 194523
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194523
Log:
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52735
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52420
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2012-12-15 18:57:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Note that my first example is not related to NSDMIs, it occurs in a static data
member initializer.
The actual reason
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-12-15
19:03:10 UTC ---
Oops, 4.6.x says that NSDMIs are needed for line 10 and rejects it, that misled
me. Then, what can I say, probably the issue isn't a regression
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53359
Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-12-15
19:07:34 UTC ---
To repeat: in order to, so to speak, raise the priority of this issue, we need
a testcase which was accepted by 4.6.x (or 4.7.x): the testcase we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54799
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
--- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 19:46:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
(In reply to comment #11)
Ok, revised version of the patch from comment 9, which fixes the runtime
failure on internal_pack_10.f90:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
2012-12-15 19:55:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
So will the following do that:
//
template class T
struct X {
static void (*code) ();
};
template
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53766
--- Comment #5 from Duncan Sands baldrick at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15
20:04:16 UTC ---
Thanks for fixing the problem!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
--- Comment #15 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 20:47:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times original
sub_array_assumed \\(D 2
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55711
Bug #: 55711
Summary: Internal compiler error while compiling
openssl1.0.1c/crypto/asn1/a_strex.c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
--- Comment #16 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 21:06:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
type(t3), pointer :: array_t3_ptr(:,:)
call sub_array_assumed (array_t3_ptr)
contains
subroutine sub_array_assumed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
--- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15 21:26:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
Question is: Is the packing needed here? I would guess that it isn't.
Of course I might be wrong here. After all, array_t3_ptr is a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55695
ojab ojab at ojab dot ru changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joseph at codesourcery dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55638
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-12-15
23:25:41 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Dec 15 23:25:36 2012
New Revision: 194525
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=194525
Log:
2012-12-16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55072
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55711
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
72 matches
Mail list logo