[Bug middle-end/56474] [4.8 regression] bogus Storage_Error raised for record containing empty zero-based array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2013-03-05 09:05:04 UTC --- On Mon, 4 Mar 2013, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56474 --- Comment #12 from

[Bug tree-optimization/56096] Sub-optimal code generated for conditional shift

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56096 Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/56470] [4.8 Regression] ICE output_operand: invalid shift operand

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56470 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 09:14:46 UTC --- If the folder or GIMPLE passes see it is a shift by 32, they fold it away (with or without a warning), so the fact that it is a constant larger than

[Bug lto/56515] [4.8 Regression] location references block not in block tree, verify_gimple failed (LTO + profile)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56515 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 09:20:36 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 5 09:20:30 2013 New Revision: 196452 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196452 Log: 2013-03-05

[Bug lto/56515] [4.8 Regression] location references block not in block tree, verify_gimple failed (LTO + profile)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56515 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 09:38:03 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 5 09:37:56 2013 New Revision: 196453 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196453 Log: PR

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #29 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 09:38:52 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 5 09:38:48 2013 New Revision: 196454 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196454 Log: PR

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 09:39:49 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 5 09:39:43 2013 New Revision: 196455 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196455 Log: PR

[Bug tree-optimization/56531] New: SLP load permutations cannot share the load between and inside SLP instances

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56531 Bug #: 56531 Summary: SLP load permutations cannot share the load between and inside SLP instances Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug tree-optimization/56531] SLP load permutations cannot share the load between and inside SLP instances

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56531 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/56270] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] loop over array of struct float causes compiler error: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56270 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 09:54:43 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 5 09:54:29 2013 New Revision: 196458 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196458 Log: 2013-03-05

[Bug tree-optimization/56270] [4.6/4.7 Regression] loop over array of struct float causes compiler error: segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56270 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.0

[Bug c++/56530] Bogus warning with -Wsign-conversion (again)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56530 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-03-05 10:02:10 UTC --- Mainline and current 4_7-branch are fine. Not sure which patch fixed it.

[Bug tree-optimization/56294] BOOT_CFLAGS='-O2 -g -fno-ipa-sra' leads to bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294 --- Comment #16 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 10:02:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) (In reply to comment #13) A guess is that you end up creating SSA names during code transform in different order

[Bug tree-optimization/56522] [4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 9% / 11% slower

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56522 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug lto/50494] gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #24 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 10:18:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #23) How can the patch cause a name collision when all the patch does is avoid creating a new decl...? They are static and

[Bug middle-end/56526] [4.8 regression] false positive for maybe-uninitialized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56526 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/56525] [4.8 Regression] Access to ggc_freed memory in flow_loops_find

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56525 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug lto/56532] New: valgrind errors with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56532 Bug #: 56532 Summary: valgrind errors with -flto Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/56530] Bogus warning with -Wsign-conversion (again)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56530 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/56484] [4.8 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1268

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56484 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 11:06:26 UTC --- Actually, looking more at this, I'd say combiner is innocent here, the problem is earlier , during ce1 pass, which transforms: 16: ax:SI=call

[Bug c++/56530] Bogus warning with -Wsign-conversion (again)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56530 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 11:14:36 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Mar 5 11:14:28 2013 New Revision: 196459 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196459 Log:

[Bug c++/56530] Bogus warning with -Wsign-conversion (again)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56530 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 11:15:23 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Mar 5 11:15:17 2013 New Revision: 196460 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196460 Log:

[Bug c++/56530] Bogus warning with -Wsign-conversion (again)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56530 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/56521] [4.8 Regression] Uninitialized value_id

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56521 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/56484] [4.8 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1268

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56484 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/55295] [SH] Add support for fipr instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55295 --- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 12:28:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Why is a new ABI important? Because currently, there is no way to pass something like struct { float x, y, z, w };

[Bug target/56533] New: Linker problem on avr with lto and main function inside archive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56533 Bug #: 56533 Summary: Linker problem on avr with lto and main function inside archive Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status:

[Bug target/56533] Linker problem on avr with lto and main function inside archive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56533 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 12:38:51 UTC --- + /usr/bin/avr-gcc -mmcu=atmega328p -Os -flto -fwhole-program realmain.o main.a please provide the console output produced when adding -v to

[Bug middle-end/56525] [4.8 Regression] Access to ggc_freed memory in flow_loops_find

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56525 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 12:51:35 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 5 12:51:28 2013 New Revision: 196462 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196462 Log: 2013-03-05

[Bug middle-end/56525] [4.8 Regression] Access to ggc_freed memory in flow_loops_find

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56525 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/56522] [4.8 Regression] Bytemark ASSIGNMENT 9% / 11% slower

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56522 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/55295] [SH] Add support for fipr instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55295 --- Comment #6 from Manu Evans turkeyman at gmail dot com 2013-03-05 12:53:26 UTC --- Awesome, thanks for the info and help! Strange -m4-single won't work with my toolchain, it says 'not compatible with this configuration' _ Looking

[Bug target/56533] Linker problem on avr with lto and main function inside archive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56533 --- Comment #2 from Matthijs Kooijman matthijs at stdin dot nl 2013-03-05 12:55:47 UTC --- + /usr/bin/avr-gcc -v -mmcu=atmega328p -Os -flto -fwhole-program realmain.o main.a Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/avr-gcc

[Bug target/56533] Linker problem on avr with lto and main function inside archive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56533 --- Comment #3 from Matthijs Kooijman matthijs at stdin dot nl 2013-03-05 13:06:18 UTC --- Seems I made a wrong observation in my original report: When I link main.o instead of main.a, the problem does _not_ go away. In fact, I can remove a

[Bug c++/56534] New: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE Segfault on invalid code in check_elaborated_type_specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56534 Bug #: 56534 Summary: [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE Segfault on invalid code in check_elaborated_type_specifier Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3

[Bug lto/50494] gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #25 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 13:19:53 UTC --- Btw, I cannot reproduce the issue with t.c: void bar (int *); void foo (void) { int a[] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 0, 1, 2, 3,

[Bug c++/56534] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE Segfault on invalid code in check_elaborated_type_specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56534 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-03-05 13:31:14 UTC --- Looks like a Dup of PR55786.

[Bug target/56533] Linker problem on avr with lto and main function inside archive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56533 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/56534] [4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE Segfault on invalid code in check_elaborated_type_specifier

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56534 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug debug/53363] g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/thunk1.C FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363 Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug debug/53363] g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/thunk1.C FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363 --- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-03-05 13:48:03 UTC --- Created attachment 29584 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29584 m32 thunk1.s -std=gnu++98 on x86_64-apple-darwin12 at r196444

[Bug debug/56510] [4.7/4.8 Regression] More var-tracking scalability problems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56510 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug lto/50494] gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #26 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 13:51:28 UTC --- The question is why we don't hit lto-lang.c:lto_set_decl_assembler_name mangling of !TREE_PUBLIC decls when streaming in the decl for the constant

[Bug fortran/56535] New: ICE: in build2_stat, at tree.c:3885 when compiling with -fsanitize=address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56535 Bug #: 56535 Summary: ICE: in build2_stat, at tree.c:3885 when compiling with -fsanitize=address Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug lto/56536] New: GCC with LTO and `-march=pentium3' tries to generate SSE2 code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56536 Bug #: 56536 Summary: GCC with LTO and `-march=pentium3' tries to generate SSE2 code Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug lto/50494] gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #27 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2013-03-05 13:58:15 UTC --- On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #26 from

[Bug c++/56537] New: [C++11] lambda expression treats members as const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56537 Bug #: 56537 Summary: [C++11] lambda expression treats members as const Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/56537] [C++11] lambda expression treats members as const

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56537 Martin von Gagern Martin.vGagern at gmx dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/54277] Template class member referred to with implicit this inside lambda is incorrectly const-qualified

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54277 Martin von Gagern Martin.vGagern at gmx dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug debug/53363] g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/thunk1.C FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug lto/50494] gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #28 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 14:23:19 UTC --- Hmm, but when I use the same contents for the two arrays in my simple testcase I do get only a single .LC0 output referenced from two places. We

[Bug lto/50494] gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #29 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2013-03-05 14:26:00 UTC --- On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, rguenther at suse dot de wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #27 from

[Bug target/56538] New: No opiton to disable slow 'lock' instr. one does not need

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56538 Bug #: 56538 Summary: No opiton to disable slow 'lock' instr. one does not need Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug target/56533] Linker problem on avr with lto and main function inside archive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56533 Matthijs Kooijman matthijs at stdin dot nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug lto/50494] gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #30 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 14:39:00 UTC --- So we can revert the part of the patch that ends up not creating a new decl but only transfer DECL_ALIGN. But then we still don't merge the

[Bug c++/55786] g++ segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55786 Andreas Beckmann gcc at abeckmann dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gcc at

[Bug target/56533] Linker problem on avr with lto and main function inside archive

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56533 Matthijs Kooijman matthijs at stdin dot nl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/55135] [4.8 Regression] Segfault of gcc on a big file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 --- Comment #21 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 14:45:32 UTC --- Author: steven Date: Tue Mar 5 14:45:23 2013 New Revision: 196464 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196464 Log: gcc/ PR

[Bug target/56536] GCC with LTO and `-march=pentium3' tries to generate SSE2 code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56536 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug debug/53363] g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/thunk1.C FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363 --- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-03-05 15:01:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) It seems that darwin doesn't do PIC the way ELF targets do, so this test should be skipped. I also confirmed

[Bug tree-optimization/56521] [4.8 Regression] Uninitialized value_id

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56521 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 15:03:07 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 5 15:02:58 2013 New Revision: 196465 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196465 Log: 2013-03-05

[Bug lto/50494] gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #31 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2013-03-05 15:09:06 UTC --- On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #28 from

[Bug debug/53363] g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/thunk1.C FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-03-05 15:11:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) This failure has re-appeared at r196444 on x86_64-apple-darwin12... FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/thunk1.C

[Bug tree-optimization/56521] [4.8 Regression] Uninitialized value_id

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56521 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/56526] [4.8 regression] false positive for maybe-uninitialized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56526 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 15:16:59 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 5 15:16:49 2013 New Revision: 196466 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196466 Log: PR

[Bug middle-end/56526] [4.8 regression] false positive for maybe-uninitialized

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56526 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug lto/50494] gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #32 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 15:32:15 UTC --- But in all places I found we check TREE_ASM_WRITTEN on DECL_INITIAL of the SYMBOL_REF_DECL ... Nope, maybe_output_constant_def_contents has:

[Bug debug/53363] g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/thunk1.C FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363 --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 15:41:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) What is supposed to be tested? Should the whole test skipped on darwin or only the dg-final? The whole test; the test is

[Bug lto/50494] gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #33 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de 2013-03-05 15:48:03 UTC --- On Tue, 5 Mar 2013, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #32 from

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #32 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 15:49:55 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 5 15:49:43 2013 New Revision: 196467 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196467 Log: PR

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #33 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 15:50:52 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 5 15:50:38 2013 New Revision: 196468 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196468 Log: PR

[Bug middle-end/56461] [4.8 Regression] GCC is leaking lots of memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56461 --- Comment #34 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 15:52:02 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 5 15:51:48 2013 New Revision: 196469 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196469 Log: PR

[Bug lto/50494] gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494 --- Comment #34 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 16:05:44 UTC --- Created attachment 29587 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29587 Patch to restore LTO bootstrap with Ada + comment tweaks OK,

[Bug tree-optimization/56539] New: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed: caused by -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56539 Bug #: 56539 Summary: [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed: caused by -foptimize-sibling-calls Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3

[Bug middle-end/56524] [4.8 Regression] Compiler ICE when compiling with -mips16

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56524 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/56524] [4.8 Regression] Compiler ICE when compiling with -mips16

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56524 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 16:24:35 UTC --- Created attachment 29588 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29588 reduced testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/56539] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed: caused by -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56539 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.4.3

[Bug tree-optimization/56539] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed: caused by -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56539 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 16:27:50 UTC --- N.B. -O3 is needed to trigger the bug with 4.5.2

[Bug preprocessor/56540] New: No __SIZEOF__XXX__ macro for __float128

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56540 Bug #: 56540 Summary: No __SIZEOF__XXX__ macro for __float128 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/56539] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed: caused by -foptimize-sibling-calls

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56539 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/55135] [4.8 Regression] Segfault of gcc on a big file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55135 --- Comment #22 from Steven Bosscher steven at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 16:40:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) I have a fix proper for this problem in testing. Posted for discussion here:

[Bug tree-optimization/56541] New: vectorizaton fails in conditional assignment of a constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56541 Bug #: 56541 Summary: vectorizaton fails in conditional assignment of a constant Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/56294] BOOT_CFLAGS='-O2 -g -fno-ipa-sra' leads to bootstrap comparison failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56294 --- Comment #18 from Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 16:49:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) Which is the testcase that still fails? The attached and more reduced ones pass for me ... The testcase from comment

[Bug debug/53363] g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/thunk1.C FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363 --- Comment #15 from Jack Howarth howarth at nitro dot med.uc.edu 2013-03-05 16:55:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) (In reply to comment #13) What is supposed to be tested? Should the whole test skipped on darwin or only the

[Bug c++/56542] New: complex number division underflow on darwin11 without -lm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56542 Bug #: 56542 Summary: complex number division underflow on darwin11 without -lm Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.2.1 Status:

[Bug c++/50276] [C++0x] Wrong used uninitialized in this function warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50276 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/52183] [C++0x] Redeclaration of __this in lambda inside template member function when calling static class function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52183 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/56222] Pointer to member in lambda should not require this to be captured

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56222 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/51494] Legal program rejection - capturing this when using static method inside lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51494 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/56543] New: [4.7.3/4.8 Regression] ICE on valid code in copy_node_stat

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56543 Bug #: 56543 Summary: [4.7.3/4.8 Regression] ICE on valid code in copy_node_stat Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/49234] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow gives obviously unwarranted warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49234 --- Comment #16 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 18:00:12 UTC --- Created attachment 29590 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29590 WIP: proposed patch special casing constant phi arguments Ian.

[Bug web/56544] New: documentation for __cplusplus is out of date

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56544 Bug #: 56544 Summary: documentation for __cplusplus is out of date Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/56545] New: internal compiler error: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5790

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56545 Bug #: 56545 Summary: internal compiler error: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5790 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug web/56544] documentation for __cplusplus is out of date

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56544 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/56545] internal compiler error: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5790

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56545 --- Comment #1 from Eric Christiansen ericmartinchristiansen at gmail dot com 2013-03-05 18:42:04 UTC --- Created attachment 29591 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29591 preprocessed source

[Bug c++/50276] [C++0x] Wrong used uninitialized in this function warning

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50276 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 18:58:41 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Mar 5 18:58:36 2013 New Revision: 196472 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=196472 Log: PR c++/50276

[Bug debug/53363] g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/thunk1.C FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363 --- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-03-05 19:01:18 UTC --- If it's easier to just disable the dg-final, that's fine too.

[Bug c++/56545] internal compiler error: in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5790

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56545 Markus Trippelsdorf markus at trippelsdorf dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

  1   2   >