[Bug target/57017] «Error: expecting string instruction after `rep'» in code w/o inline assembly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57017 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|

[Bug target/57017] «Error: expecting string instruction after `rep'» in code w/o inline assembly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57017 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-24 06:15:46 UTC --- Can't reproduce, perhaps misconfigured compiler? HAVE_AS_IX86_REP_LOCK_PREFIX test in particular. You haven't said what target it is and how you've

[Bug target/57017] «Error: expecting string instruction after `rep'» in code w/o inline assembly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57017 Alan Aversa aaversa at optics dot arizona.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/57053] New: inaccurate message for ambiguous calls when in fact there is not valid candidate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57053 Bug #: 57053 Summary: inaccurate message for ambiguous calls when in fact there is not valid candidate Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug c++/57053] inaccurate message for ambiguous calls when in fact there is not valid candidate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57053 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c/57051] Optimization regression in 4.8.0 from 4.7.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57051 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/57051] Optimization regression in 4.8.0 from 4.7.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57051 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-24 08:10:21 UTC --- Well, one thing differs, 4.7 with -O3 aligns 'total' to .align 16 whereas 4.8 with -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize has .align 4

[Bug testsuite/57050] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr56982.c compilation, -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57050 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/57050] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr56982.c compilation, -O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57050 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/57051] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Optimization regression in 4.8.0 from 4.7.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57051 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/57052] missed optimization with rotate and mask

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57052 Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc-linux

[Bug c++/56915] [4.9 regression] ICE in symtab_add_to_same_comdat_group, at symtab.c:383

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56915 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-04-24 09:16:20 UTC --- Normally patches go to gcc-patches.

[Bug c/57054] New: Compilation with -O3 passes, with -O2 fails (ARM/NEON)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57054 Bug #: 57054 Summary: Compilation with -O3 passes, with -O2 fails (ARM/NEON) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/57054] Compilation with -O3 passes, with -O2 fails (ARM/NEON)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57054 --- Comment #1 from nizamov.shawkat at gmail dot com 2013-04-24 09:22:59 UTC --- Created attachment 29926 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29926 save-temps

[Bug c/57054] Compilation with -O3 passes, with -O2 fails (ARM/NEON)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57054 --- Comment #2 from nizamov.shawkat at gmail dot com 2013-04-24 09:23:48 UTC --- Created attachment 29927 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29927 Preprocessed source stored into file, please attach this to your bugreport.

[Bug middle-end/57003] gcc-4.8.0 breaks -O2 optimization with Wine(64) - links/info/bisect of commits included

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003 Bernd Schmidt bernds at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds

[Bug c++/57041] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE in lookup_field_1, at cp/search.c:376 (with dot-prefixed structure initialisation)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57041 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-04-24 09:28:19 UTC --- This is a Dup of testcase in Comment #2 of PR55365.

[Bug c++/56915] [4.9 regression] ICE in symtab_add_to_same_comdat_group, at symtab.c:383

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56915 --- Comment #6 from Shixiong shixiong at kugelworks dot com 2013-04-24 09:36:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) yes, I know that. I just want to let the bug submitter have a try. Normally patches go to gcc-patches.

[Bug c++/56973] crash when capturing variables in nested lambdas

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56973 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/56970] SFINAE does not apply correctly to sizeof.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56970 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/56970] SFINAE does not apply correctly to sizeof.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56970 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major

[Bug tree-optimization/57051] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Optimization regression in 4.8.0 from 4.7.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57051 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-24 10:44:13 UTC --- Created attachment 29928 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29928 gcc49-pr57051.patch It isn't that hard to fold VEC_RSHIFT_EXPR, at

[Bug middle-end/57055] New: Incorrect CFG after transactional memory passes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57055 Bug #: 57055 Summary: Incorrect CFG after transactional memory passes Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/57055] Incorrect CFG after transactional memory passes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57055 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at

[Bug c++/57038] Latest libreoffice compilation fails with enabled LTO

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57038 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-24 13:35:36 UTC --- Hmm, the failing test is: /* Be sure that we never try to duplicate partitioned symbol or add external symbol. */ gcc_assert (c !=

[Bug target/56797] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2150

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56797 --- Comment #3 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-24 14:17:52 UTC --- Author: gretay Date: Fri Apr 19 12:55:26 2013 New Revision: 198091 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198091root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-04-19 Greta Yorsh

[Bug target/56797] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2150

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56797 --- Comment #4 from gretay at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-24 14:18:04 UTC --- Author: gretay Date: Wed Apr 24 10:43:41 2013 New Revision: 198220 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=198220root=gccview=rev Log: 2013-04-24 Greta Yorsh

[Bug target/56797] [4.8 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2150

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56797 gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/57028] [4.9 regression] Fortran bootstrap fails due to missing zlib.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57028 gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gretay at gcc dot

[Bug bootstrap/57028] [4.9 regression] Fortran bootstrap fails due to missing zlib.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57028 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jb at gcc

[Bug c++/56970] SFINAE does not apply correctly to sizeof.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56970 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/57003] gcc-4.8.0 breaks -O2 optimization with Wine(64) - links/info/bisect of commits included

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003 --- Comment #14 from Kirill Smirnov kirill.k.smirnov at math dot spbu.ru 2013-04-24 16:06:41 UTC --- Created attachment 29929 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29929 gcc -E output. Attached gcc -E output. Lines around

[Bug target/57056] New: Missed optimization of finite finite builtin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57056 Bug #: 57056 Summary: Missed optimization of finite finite builtin Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/57057] New: Bad optimization on x86 for minps and maxps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57057 Bug #: 57057 Summary: Bad optimization on x86 for minps and maxps Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/57057] Bad optimization on x86 for minps and maxps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57057 --- Comment #1 from Mathias Gaunard mathias at gaunard dot com 2013-04-24 16:42:23 UTC --- Created attachment 29931 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29931 bad optimisation testcase

[Bug c++/53721] [C++11] this not allowed in trailing return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53721 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/57003] [4.8/4.9 Regression] gcc-4.8.0 breaks -O2 optimization with Wine(64) - links/info/bisect of commits included

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW

[Bug bootstrap/57028] [4.9 regression] Fortran bootstrap fails due to missing zlib.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57028 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se 2013-04-24 16:54:41 UTC --- As far as I understand it, there are two issues: 1. zlib isn't built unless some explicitly enabled component demands it; in my case (on x86_64) zlib

[Bug target/57054] Compilation with -O3 passes, with -O2 fails (ARM/NEON)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57054 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug libgcc/57058] New: Bootstrap problems on AIX (libgcc configure, 64-bit)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57058 Bug #: 57058 Summary: Bootstrap problems on AIX (libgcc configure, 64-bit) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug bootstrap/57059] New: Host configuration of loose_warn breaks for build components for Canadian crosses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57059 Bug #: 57059 Summary: Host configuration of loose_warn breaks for build components for Canadian crosses Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/57003] [4.8/4.9 Regression] gcc-4.8.0 breaks -O2 optimization with Wine(64) - links/info/bisect of commits included

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-24 18:24:23 UTC --- Reduced testcase (non-runtime, but one can see that %rdi which should be clobbered by the memcpy call is used immediately after the memcpy call).

[Bug bootstrap/57059] [4.8/4.9 Regression] Host configuration of loose_warn breaks for build components for Canadian crosses

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57059 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/57056] Missed optimization of finite finite builtin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57056 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-24 18:43:08 UTC --- Some relevant links: PR 56944 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15384 http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-04/msg00568.html Note

[Bug rtl-optimization/57003] [4.8/4.9 Regression] gcc-4.8.0 breaks -O2 optimization with Wine(64) - links/info/bisect of commits included

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-04-24 18:45:28 UTC --- Runtime testcase for -O2, works with -O2 -fno-cprop-registers. It doesn't fail always, but around in 50% of cases, and heavily depends on what glibc is

[Bug c++/56859] alignas() fails in template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56859 Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libstdc++/57060] New: std::this_thread::get_id() == std::thread::id::id() without -pthread

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57060 Bug #: 57060 Summary: std::this_thread::get_id() == std::thread::id::id() without -pthread Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status:

[Bug c/57061] New: [patch] gcc-4.7.3 has declarations after statements and fails to compile on old systems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57061 Bug #: 57061 Summary: [patch] gcc-4.7.3 has declarations after statements and fails to compile on old systems Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3

[Bug bootstrap/57028] [4.9 regression] Fortran bootstrap fails due to missing zlib.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57028 Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added URL|

[Bug middle-end/57061] [patch] gcc-4.7.3 has declarations after statements and fails to compile on old systems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57061 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build

[Bug target/56866] gcc 4.7.x/gcc-4.8.x with '-O3 -march=bdver2' misscompiles glibc-2.17/crypt/sha512.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56866 --- Comment #13 from Winfried Magerl winfried.mag...@t-online.de 2013-04-24 20:58:13 UTC --- Hi, On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 09:49:15PM +, glisse at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56866 ---

[Bug other/57062] New: genattrtab reports errors in wrong file

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57062 Bug #: 57062 Summary: genattrtab reports errors in wrong file Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/57063] New: Valid static_cast from data member to rvalue reference fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57063 Bug #: 57063 Summary: Valid static_cast from data member to rvalue reference fails to compile Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1 Status:

[Bug c++/57063] Valid static_cast from data member to rvalue reference fails to compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57063 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/56905] [C++11][DR 1130] std::copy_exception should be removed or no longer be used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56905 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/56716] during gcc 4.8.0 build on Cygwin: bid128_fma.c:4460:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56716 Greg gccbugzi...@tru-traffic.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/57064] New: [clarification requested] Which overload with ref-qualifier should be called?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57064 Bug #: 57064 Summary: [clarification requested] Which overload with ref-qualifier should be called? Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.1

[Bug c++/57064] [clarification requested] Which overload with ref-qualifier should be called?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57064 --- Comment #1 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org 2013-04-25 00:45:00 UTC --- Here's why I'm asking: QString has members like: QString arg(int, [other parameters]) const; Which are used like so: return QString(%1

[Bug c++/57064] [clarification requested] Which overload with ref-qualifier should be called?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57064 --- Comment #2 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org 2013-04-25 00:45:39 UTC --- This was a self-compiled, pristine GCC gcc version 4.8.1 20130420 (prerelease) (GCC) trunk at 198107

[Bug c++/57064] [clarification requested] Which overload with ref-qualifier should be called?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57064 --- Comment #3 from Thiago Macieira thiago at kde dot org 2013-04-25 00:53:20 UTC --- One more note. Given: void p(A ); void p(A ); void f(A a) { p(a); } like the member function case, this calls p(A ). It's slightly

[Bug target/57017] «Error: expecting string instruction after `rep'» in code w/o inline assembly

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57017 --- Comment #8 from Alan Aversa aaversa at optics dot arizona.edu 2013-04-25 02:53:02 UTC --- I upgraded to binutils 2.23.52.0.1 and the problem went away.

[Bug libstdc++/57065] New: incorrect default allocator template for debug and profile unordered_map

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57065 Bug #: 57065 Summary: incorrect default allocator template for debug and profile unordered_map Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0